Cargando…
Seroprevalence and risk factors of Brucella ovis in domestic sheep in Wyoming, USA
BACKGROUND: Brucella ovis causes a sexually transmitted, infectious disease of domestic sheep characterized by genital lesions and epididymitis in rams, placentitis and rare abortions in ewes, and neonatal mortality in lambs. This study was designed to 1) estimate animal and flock seroprevalence of...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6631759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31307483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-1995-5 |
_version_ | 1783435593374498816 |
---|---|
author | Elderbrook, Molly Schumaker, Brant Cornish, Todd Peck, Dannele Sondgeroth, Kerry |
author_facet | Elderbrook, Molly Schumaker, Brant Cornish, Todd Peck, Dannele Sondgeroth, Kerry |
author_sort | Elderbrook, Molly |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Brucella ovis causes a sexually transmitted, infectious disease of domestic sheep characterized by genital lesions and epididymitis in rams, placentitis and rare abortions in ewes, and neonatal mortality in lambs. This study was designed to 1) estimate animal and flock seroprevalence of B. ovis in sheep across Wyoming, USA, and 2) describe epidemiologic risk factors associated with seropositive sheep and flocks. For the animal seroprevalence estimate, 2423 blood samples were collected from sheep on 18 producer-selected operations and a questionnaire about possible risk factors was distributed. For the flock seroprevalence estimate, blood samples from 82 operations were obtained, including samples from the previous 18 operations and 64 additional operations that sent samples to the Wyoming State Veterinary Laboratory for diagnostic testing. Categorical risk factors were created based on questionnaires and submission forms. Sera was analyzed using the B. ovis enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Estimated true animal and flock seroprevalence were 0.53% (95% CI: 0.21–1.01%; 22/2,423) and 22.5% (95% CI: 14–32%; 18/82), respectively. Using Fisher’s exact and Mid-p exact tests to compare apparent seroprevalence with respect to possible risk factors, increased age and breed type were risk factors associated with seropositive sheep, while region and large flock size were risk factors associated with seropositive flocks. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study suggest few sheep have been exposed to B. ovis, but many flocks contain at least one seropositive animal. Each region in Wyoming contained at least one seropositive animal and flock, emphasizing the importance of disease-free documentation before purchasing new sheep. Aged sheep (≥ 6 years of age) had the highest seroprevalence among age groups; hence, we propose the separation of young rams from older rams to help reduce disease spread outside the breeding season. Wool breeds (Rambouillet and Merino) may be less susceptible to B. ovis infection given they had the lowest animal seroprevalence of the breed types, and large flocks (> 100 breeding rams) had the highest seroprevalence of the flock size categories, likely due to more intensive management strategies that can contribute to the introduction and persistence of B. ovis infection in sheep and flocks. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12917-019-1995-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6631759 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66317592019-07-24 Seroprevalence and risk factors of Brucella ovis in domestic sheep in Wyoming, USA Elderbrook, Molly Schumaker, Brant Cornish, Todd Peck, Dannele Sondgeroth, Kerry BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Brucella ovis causes a sexually transmitted, infectious disease of domestic sheep characterized by genital lesions and epididymitis in rams, placentitis and rare abortions in ewes, and neonatal mortality in lambs. This study was designed to 1) estimate animal and flock seroprevalence of B. ovis in sheep across Wyoming, USA, and 2) describe epidemiologic risk factors associated with seropositive sheep and flocks. For the animal seroprevalence estimate, 2423 blood samples were collected from sheep on 18 producer-selected operations and a questionnaire about possible risk factors was distributed. For the flock seroprevalence estimate, blood samples from 82 operations were obtained, including samples from the previous 18 operations and 64 additional operations that sent samples to the Wyoming State Veterinary Laboratory for diagnostic testing. Categorical risk factors were created based on questionnaires and submission forms. Sera was analyzed using the B. ovis enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Estimated true animal and flock seroprevalence were 0.53% (95% CI: 0.21–1.01%; 22/2,423) and 22.5% (95% CI: 14–32%; 18/82), respectively. Using Fisher’s exact and Mid-p exact tests to compare apparent seroprevalence with respect to possible risk factors, increased age and breed type were risk factors associated with seropositive sheep, while region and large flock size were risk factors associated with seropositive flocks. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study suggest few sheep have been exposed to B. ovis, but many flocks contain at least one seropositive animal. Each region in Wyoming contained at least one seropositive animal and flock, emphasizing the importance of disease-free documentation before purchasing new sheep. Aged sheep (≥ 6 years of age) had the highest seroprevalence among age groups; hence, we propose the separation of young rams from older rams to help reduce disease spread outside the breeding season. Wool breeds (Rambouillet and Merino) may be less susceptible to B. ovis infection given they had the lowest animal seroprevalence of the breed types, and large flocks (> 100 breeding rams) had the highest seroprevalence of the flock size categories, likely due to more intensive management strategies that can contribute to the introduction and persistence of B. ovis infection in sheep and flocks. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12917-019-1995-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6631759/ /pubmed/31307483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-1995-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Elderbrook, Molly Schumaker, Brant Cornish, Todd Peck, Dannele Sondgeroth, Kerry Seroprevalence and risk factors of Brucella ovis in domestic sheep in Wyoming, USA |
title | Seroprevalence and risk factors of Brucella ovis in domestic sheep in Wyoming, USA |
title_full | Seroprevalence and risk factors of Brucella ovis in domestic sheep in Wyoming, USA |
title_fullStr | Seroprevalence and risk factors of Brucella ovis in domestic sheep in Wyoming, USA |
title_full_unstemmed | Seroprevalence and risk factors of Brucella ovis in domestic sheep in Wyoming, USA |
title_short | Seroprevalence and risk factors of Brucella ovis in domestic sheep in Wyoming, USA |
title_sort | seroprevalence and risk factors of brucella ovis in domestic sheep in wyoming, usa |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6631759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31307483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-1995-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elderbrookmolly seroprevalenceandriskfactorsofbrucellaovisindomesticsheepinwyomingusa AT schumakerbrant seroprevalenceandriskfactorsofbrucellaovisindomesticsheepinwyomingusa AT cornishtodd seroprevalenceandriskfactorsofbrucellaovisindomesticsheepinwyomingusa AT peckdannele seroprevalenceandriskfactorsofbrucellaovisindomesticsheepinwyomingusa AT sondgerothkerry seroprevalenceandriskfactorsofbrucellaovisindomesticsheepinwyomingusa |