Cargando…

Meta-analysis of pain and function placebo responses in pharmacological osteoarthritis trials

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate contextual effects in the form of placebo responses (PRs) for patient-reported pain and function and objectively measured function in osteoarthritis (OA) clinical trials. METHODS: Two authors independently searched major electronic databases from inception to 20 May 2019. Incl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, ZeYu, Chen, Jing, Hu, Qin Sheng, Huang, Qiang, Ma, Jun, Pei, Fu Xing, Shen, Bin, Kraus, Virginia Byers
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6631867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31307506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1951-6
_version_ 1783435619189391360
author Huang, ZeYu
Chen, Jing
Hu, Qin Sheng
Huang, Qiang
Ma, Jun
Pei, Fu Xing
Shen, Bin
Kraus, Virginia Byers
author_facet Huang, ZeYu
Chen, Jing
Hu, Qin Sheng
Huang, Qiang
Ma, Jun
Pei, Fu Xing
Shen, Bin
Kraus, Virginia Byers
author_sort Huang, ZeYu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate contextual effects in the form of placebo responses (PRs) for patient-reported pain and function and objectively measured function in osteoarthritis (OA) clinical trials. METHODS: Two authors independently searched major electronic databases from inception to 20 May 2019. Included studies were randomized, placebo-controlled OA trials of pharmacological agents reporting both patient-reported and objectively measured outcomes. PRs for each type of outcome measure were compared by standardized mean differences (SMDs). The placebo response ratio (PRR) assessed the placebo to treatment effect size. The effect sizes of PRs and PRRs were pooled using a random effects model. RESULTS: Twenty-one trials met the inclusion criteria; 20 were double-blinded with one not reporting on blinding status. Compared with patients’ self-reported outcome (PRO) pain, PRs were significantly lower for PRO function (SMD − 0.16 [95% CI = − 0.28, − 0.05], p = 0.006), objectively measured muscle strength (SMD − 0.34 [95% CI − 0.58, − 0.10], p = 0.006), and range of motion (SMD = − 0.31 [95% CI = − 0.54, − 0.08], p = 0.008) function. Generally, PRs for function outcomes (patient-reported and objectively measured) were similar. The overall PRR for different measures ranged from the smallest (most favorable) for walking time/distance (0.30, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.43) to the largest for PRO pain (0.44, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.65). CONCLUSION: Function measures both subjective and objective had less contextual effects than pain measures in OA trials. Our results support the OMERACT-OARSI recommendations to include measures of physical function in all clinical trials of hip and knee OA and suggest that a greater use of function measures might enhance the success rates of pharmacological OA trials. Increasing the availability of mobile health apps should facilitate the acquisition of measured function data. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-019-1951-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6631867
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66318672019-07-24 Meta-analysis of pain and function placebo responses in pharmacological osteoarthritis trials Huang, ZeYu Chen, Jing Hu, Qin Sheng Huang, Qiang Ma, Jun Pei, Fu Xing Shen, Bin Kraus, Virginia Byers Arthritis Res Ther Review OBJECTIVE: To evaluate contextual effects in the form of placebo responses (PRs) for patient-reported pain and function and objectively measured function in osteoarthritis (OA) clinical trials. METHODS: Two authors independently searched major electronic databases from inception to 20 May 2019. Included studies were randomized, placebo-controlled OA trials of pharmacological agents reporting both patient-reported and objectively measured outcomes. PRs for each type of outcome measure were compared by standardized mean differences (SMDs). The placebo response ratio (PRR) assessed the placebo to treatment effect size. The effect sizes of PRs and PRRs were pooled using a random effects model. RESULTS: Twenty-one trials met the inclusion criteria; 20 were double-blinded with one not reporting on blinding status. Compared with patients’ self-reported outcome (PRO) pain, PRs were significantly lower for PRO function (SMD − 0.16 [95% CI = − 0.28, − 0.05], p = 0.006), objectively measured muscle strength (SMD − 0.34 [95% CI − 0.58, − 0.10], p = 0.006), and range of motion (SMD = − 0.31 [95% CI = − 0.54, − 0.08], p = 0.008) function. Generally, PRs for function outcomes (patient-reported and objectively measured) were similar. The overall PRR for different measures ranged from the smallest (most favorable) for walking time/distance (0.30, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.43) to the largest for PRO pain (0.44, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.65). CONCLUSION: Function measures both subjective and objective had less contextual effects than pain measures in OA trials. Our results support the OMERACT-OARSI recommendations to include measures of physical function in all clinical trials of hip and knee OA and suggest that a greater use of function measures might enhance the success rates of pharmacological OA trials. Increasing the availability of mobile health apps should facilitate the acquisition of measured function data. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-019-1951-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-15 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6631867/ /pubmed/31307506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1951-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Huang, ZeYu
Chen, Jing
Hu, Qin Sheng
Huang, Qiang
Ma, Jun
Pei, Fu Xing
Shen, Bin
Kraus, Virginia Byers
Meta-analysis of pain and function placebo responses in pharmacological osteoarthritis trials
title Meta-analysis of pain and function placebo responses in pharmacological osteoarthritis trials
title_full Meta-analysis of pain and function placebo responses in pharmacological osteoarthritis trials
title_fullStr Meta-analysis of pain and function placebo responses in pharmacological osteoarthritis trials
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analysis of pain and function placebo responses in pharmacological osteoarthritis trials
title_short Meta-analysis of pain and function placebo responses in pharmacological osteoarthritis trials
title_sort meta-analysis of pain and function placebo responses in pharmacological osteoarthritis trials
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6631867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31307506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1951-6
work_keys_str_mv AT huangzeyu metaanalysisofpainandfunctionplaceboresponsesinpharmacologicalosteoarthritistrials
AT chenjing metaanalysisofpainandfunctionplaceboresponsesinpharmacologicalosteoarthritistrials
AT huqinsheng metaanalysisofpainandfunctionplaceboresponsesinpharmacologicalosteoarthritistrials
AT huangqiang metaanalysisofpainandfunctionplaceboresponsesinpharmacologicalosteoarthritistrials
AT majun metaanalysisofpainandfunctionplaceboresponsesinpharmacologicalosteoarthritistrials
AT peifuxing metaanalysisofpainandfunctionplaceboresponsesinpharmacologicalosteoarthritistrials
AT shenbin metaanalysisofpainandfunctionplaceboresponsesinpharmacologicalosteoarthritistrials
AT krausvirginiabyers metaanalysisofpainandfunctionplaceboresponsesinpharmacologicalosteoarthritistrials