Cargando…
Microfluidic Cell Trapping for Single-Cell Analysis
The single-cell capture microfluidic chip has many advantages, including low cost, high throughput, easy manufacturing, integration, non-toxicity and good stability. Because of these characteristics, the cell capture microfluidic chip is increasingly becoming an important carrier on the study of lif...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6632028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31248148 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi10060409 |
_version_ | 1783435657476046848 |
---|---|
author | Deng, Bing Wang, Heyi Tan, Zhaoyi Quan, Yi |
author_facet | Deng, Bing Wang, Heyi Tan, Zhaoyi Quan, Yi |
author_sort | Deng, Bing |
collection | PubMed |
description | The single-cell capture microfluidic chip has many advantages, including low cost, high throughput, easy manufacturing, integration, non-toxicity and good stability. Because of these characteristics, the cell capture microfluidic chip is increasingly becoming an important carrier on the study of life science and pharmaceutical analysis. Important promises of single-cell analysis are the paring, fusion, disruption and analysis of intracellular components for capturing a single cell. The capture, which is based on the fluid dynamics method in the field of micro fluidic chips is an important way to achieve and realize the operations mentioned above. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of three fluid dynamics-based microfluidic chip structures to capture cells. The effects of cell growth and distribution after being captured by different structural chips and the subsequent observation and analysis of single cells on the chip were compared. It can be seen from the experimental results that the microfluidic chip structure most suitable for single-cell capture is a U-shaped structure. It enables single-cell capture as well as long-term continuous culture and the single-cell observation of captured cells. Compared to the U-shaped structure, the cells captured by the microcavity structure easily overlapped during the culture process and affected the subsequent analysis of single cells. The flow shortcut structure can also be used to capture and observe single cells, however, the shearing force of the fluid caused by the chip structure is likely to cause deformation of the cultured cells. By comparing the cell capture efficiency of the three chips, the reagent loss during the culture process and the cell growth state of the captured cells, we are provided with a theoretical support for the design of a single-cell capture microfluidic chip and a reference for the study of single-cell capture in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6632028 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66320282019-08-19 Microfluidic Cell Trapping for Single-Cell Analysis Deng, Bing Wang, Heyi Tan, Zhaoyi Quan, Yi Micromachines (Basel) Article The single-cell capture microfluidic chip has many advantages, including low cost, high throughput, easy manufacturing, integration, non-toxicity and good stability. Because of these characteristics, the cell capture microfluidic chip is increasingly becoming an important carrier on the study of life science and pharmaceutical analysis. Important promises of single-cell analysis are the paring, fusion, disruption and analysis of intracellular components for capturing a single cell. The capture, which is based on the fluid dynamics method in the field of micro fluidic chips is an important way to achieve and realize the operations mentioned above. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of three fluid dynamics-based microfluidic chip structures to capture cells. The effects of cell growth and distribution after being captured by different structural chips and the subsequent observation and analysis of single cells on the chip were compared. It can be seen from the experimental results that the microfluidic chip structure most suitable for single-cell capture is a U-shaped structure. It enables single-cell capture as well as long-term continuous culture and the single-cell observation of captured cells. Compared to the U-shaped structure, the cells captured by the microcavity structure easily overlapped during the culture process and affected the subsequent analysis of single cells. The flow shortcut structure can also be used to capture and observe single cells, however, the shearing force of the fluid caused by the chip structure is likely to cause deformation of the cultured cells. By comparing the cell capture efficiency of the three chips, the reagent loss during the culture process and the cell growth state of the captured cells, we are provided with a theoretical support for the design of a single-cell capture microfluidic chip and a reference for the study of single-cell capture in the future. MDPI 2019-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6632028/ /pubmed/31248148 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi10060409 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Deng, Bing Wang, Heyi Tan, Zhaoyi Quan, Yi Microfluidic Cell Trapping for Single-Cell Analysis |
title | Microfluidic Cell Trapping for Single-Cell Analysis |
title_full | Microfluidic Cell Trapping for Single-Cell Analysis |
title_fullStr | Microfluidic Cell Trapping for Single-Cell Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Microfluidic Cell Trapping for Single-Cell Analysis |
title_short | Microfluidic Cell Trapping for Single-Cell Analysis |
title_sort | microfluidic cell trapping for single-cell analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6632028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31248148 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi10060409 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dengbing microfluidiccelltrappingforsinglecellanalysis AT wangheyi microfluidiccelltrappingforsinglecellanalysis AT tanzhaoyi microfluidiccelltrappingforsinglecellanalysis AT quanyi microfluidiccelltrappingforsinglecellanalysis |