Cargando…

Compatibility between Physical Stimulus Size and Left-right Responses: Small is Left and Large is Right

According to a theory of magnitude (ATOM, Walsh, 2003, 2015), the cognitive representations of quantity, time, and space share a general magnitude code. Interestingly though, research has largely ignored the relationship between physical (stimulus) size and spatial (response) location. We conducted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wühr, Peter, Seegelke, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6634365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31517191
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.19
_version_ 1783435771465695232
author Wühr, Peter
Seegelke, Christian
author_facet Wühr, Peter
Seegelke, Christian
author_sort Wühr, Peter
collection PubMed
description According to a theory of magnitude (ATOM, Walsh, 2003, 2015), the cognitive representations of quantity, time, and space share a general magnitude code. Interestingly though, research has largely ignored the relationship between physical (stimulus) size and spatial (response) location. We conducted two experiments investigating compatibility effects between physical stimulus size and left-right responses. In both experiments, right-handed participants responded to a small or a large square stimulus by pressing a left or a right key. In Experiment 1, size was the relevant stimulus feature and we varied the S-R mapping within participants. Results revealed a strong compatibility effect: Performance was better with the compatible mapping (small-left and large-right) than with the incompatible mapping (large-left and small-right). In Experiment 2, participants responded to stimulus color, which varied independently of stimulus size, by pressing a left or right key. Results showed a congruency effect that mirrored the compatibility effect of Experiment 1. The results of our experiments suggest a strong relationship between the cognitive representation of physical (stimulus) size and response location in right-handers. The findings support the notion of a general magnitude code, as proposed in ATOM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6634365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66343652019-09-12 Compatibility between Physical Stimulus Size and Left-right Responses: Small is Left and Large is Right Wühr, Peter Seegelke, Christian J Cogn Research Article According to a theory of magnitude (ATOM, Walsh, 2003, 2015), the cognitive representations of quantity, time, and space share a general magnitude code. Interestingly though, research has largely ignored the relationship between physical (stimulus) size and spatial (response) location. We conducted two experiments investigating compatibility effects between physical stimulus size and left-right responses. In both experiments, right-handed participants responded to a small or a large square stimulus by pressing a left or a right key. In Experiment 1, size was the relevant stimulus feature and we varied the S-R mapping within participants. Results revealed a strong compatibility effect: Performance was better with the compatible mapping (small-left and large-right) than with the incompatible mapping (large-left and small-right). In Experiment 2, participants responded to stimulus color, which varied independently of stimulus size, by pressing a left or right key. Results showed a congruency effect that mirrored the compatibility effect of Experiment 1. The results of our experiments suggest a strong relationship between the cognitive representation of physical (stimulus) size and response location in right-handers. The findings support the notion of a general magnitude code, as proposed in ATOM. Ubiquity Press 2018-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6634365/ /pubmed/31517191 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.19 Text en Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wühr, Peter
Seegelke, Christian
Compatibility between Physical Stimulus Size and Left-right Responses: Small is Left and Large is Right
title Compatibility between Physical Stimulus Size and Left-right Responses: Small is Left and Large is Right
title_full Compatibility between Physical Stimulus Size and Left-right Responses: Small is Left and Large is Right
title_fullStr Compatibility between Physical Stimulus Size and Left-right Responses: Small is Left and Large is Right
title_full_unstemmed Compatibility between Physical Stimulus Size and Left-right Responses: Small is Left and Large is Right
title_short Compatibility between Physical Stimulus Size and Left-right Responses: Small is Left and Large is Right
title_sort compatibility between physical stimulus size and left-right responses: small is left and large is right
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6634365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31517191
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.19
work_keys_str_mv AT wuhrpeter compatibilitybetweenphysicalstimulussizeandleftrightresponsessmallisleftandlargeisright
AT seegelkechristian compatibilitybetweenphysicalstimulussizeandleftrightresponsessmallisleftandlargeisright