Cargando…
Compatibility between Physical Stimulus Size and Left-right Responses: Small is Left and Large is Right
According to a theory of magnitude (ATOM, Walsh, 2003, 2015), the cognitive representations of quantity, time, and space share a general magnitude code. Interestingly though, research has largely ignored the relationship between physical (stimulus) size and spatial (response) location. We conducted...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ubiquity Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6634365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31517191 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.19 |
_version_ | 1783435771465695232 |
---|---|
author | Wühr, Peter Seegelke, Christian |
author_facet | Wühr, Peter Seegelke, Christian |
author_sort | Wühr, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | According to a theory of magnitude (ATOM, Walsh, 2003, 2015), the cognitive representations of quantity, time, and space share a general magnitude code. Interestingly though, research has largely ignored the relationship between physical (stimulus) size and spatial (response) location. We conducted two experiments investigating compatibility effects between physical stimulus size and left-right responses. In both experiments, right-handed participants responded to a small or a large square stimulus by pressing a left or a right key. In Experiment 1, size was the relevant stimulus feature and we varied the S-R mapping within participants. Results revealed a strong compatibility effect: Performance was better with the compatible mapping (small-left and large-right) than with the incompatible mapping (large-left and small-right). In Experiment 2, participants responded to stimulus color, which varied independently of stimulus size, by pressing a left or right key. Results showed a congruency effect that mirrored the compatibility effect of Experiment 1. The results of our experiments suggest a strong relationship between the cognitive representation of physical (stimulus) size and response location in right-handers. The findings support the notion of a general magnitude code, as proposed in ATOM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6634365 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Ubiquity Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66343652019-09-12 Compatibility between Physical Stimulus Size and Left-right Responses: Small is Left and Large is Right Wühr, Peter Seegelke, Christian J Cogn Research Article According to a theory of magnitude (ATOM, Walsh, 2003, 2015), the cognitive representations of quantity, time, and space share a general magnitude code. Interestingly though, research has largely ignored the relationship between physical (stimulus) size and spatial (response) location. We conducted two experiments investigating compatibility effects between physical stimulus size and left-right responses. In both experiments, right-handed participants responded to a small or a large square stimulus by pressing a left or a right key. In Experiment 1, size was the relevant stimulus feature and we varied the S-R mapping within participants. Results revealed a strong compatibility effect: Performance was better with the compatible mapping (small-left and large-right) than with the incompatible mapping (large-left and small-right). In Experiment 2, participants responded to stimulus color, which varied independently of stimulus size, by pressing a left or right key. Results showed a congruency effect that mirrored the compatibility effect of Experiment 1. The results of our experiments suggest a strong relationship between the cognitive representation of physical (stimulus) size and response location in right-handers. The findings support the notion of a general magnitude code, as proposed in ATOM. Ubiquity Press 2018-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6634365/ /pubmed/31517191 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.19 Text en Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wühr, Peter Seegelke, Christian Compatibility between Physical Stimulus Size and Left-right Responses: Small is Left and Large is Right |
title | Compatibility between Physical Stimulus Size and Left-right Responses: Small is Left and Large is Right |
title_full | Compatibility between Physical Stimulus Size and Left-right Responses: Small is Left and Large is Right |
title_fullStr | Compatibility between Physical Stimulus Size and Left-right Responses: Small is Left and Large is Right |
title_full_unstemmed | Compatibility between Physical Stimulus Size and Left-right Responses: Small is Left and Large is Right |
title_short | Compatibility between Physical Stimulus Size and Left-right Responses: Small is Left and Large is Right |
title_sort | compatibility between physical stimulus size and left-right responses: small is left and large is right |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6634365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31517191 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wuhrpeter compatibilitybetweenphysicalstimulussizeandleftrightresponsessmallisleftandlargeisright AT seegelkechristian compatibilitybetweenphysicalstimulussizeandleftrightresponsessmallisleftandlargeisright |