Cargando…
Pupil Dilation Reflects Task Relevance Prior to Search
When observers search for a specific target, it is assumed that they activate a representation of the task relevant object in visual working memory (VWM). This representation – often referred to as the template – guides attention towards matching visual input. In two experiments we tested whether th...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ubiquity Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6634601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31517185 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.12 |
_version_ | 1783435798766419968 |
---|---|
author | Olmos-Solis, Katya van Loon, Anouk M. Olivers, Christian N. L. |
author_facet | Olmos-Solis, Katya van Loon, Anouk M. Olivers, Christian N. L. |
author_sort | Olmos-Solis, Katya |
collection | PubMed |
description | When observers search for a specific target, it is assumed that they activate a representation of the task relevant object in visual working memory (VWM). This representation – often referred to as the template – guides attention towards matching visual input. In two experiments we tested whether the pupil response can be used to differentiate stimuli that match the task-relevant template from irrelevant input. Observers memorized a target color to be searched for in a multi-color visual search display, presented after a delay period. In Experiment 1, one color appeared at the start of the trial, which was then automatically the search template. In Experiments 2, two colors were presented, and a retro-cue indicated which of these was relevant for the upcoming search task. Crucially, before the search display appeared, we briefly presented one colored probe stimulus. The probe could match either the relevant-template color, the non-cued color (irrelevant), or be a new color not presented in the trial. We measured the pupil response to the probe as a signature of task relevance. Experiment 1 showed significantly smaller pupil size in response to probes matching the search template than for irrelevant colors. Experiment 2 replicated the template matching effect and allowed us to rule out that it was solely due to repetition priming. Taken together, we show that the pupil responds selectively to participants’ target template prior to search. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6634601 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Ubiquity Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66346012019-09-12 Pupil Dilation Reflects Task Relevance Prior to Search Olmos-Solis, Katya van Loon, Anouk M. Olivers, Christian N. L. J Cogn Research Article When observers search for a specific target, it is assumed that they activate a representation of the task relevant object in visual working memory (VWM). This representation – often referred to as the template – guides attention towards matching visual input. In two experiments we tested whether the pupil response can be used to differentiate stimuli that match the task-relevant template from irrelevant input. Observers memorized a target color to be searched for in a multi-color visual search display, presented after a delay period. In Experiment 1, one color appeared at the start of the trial, which was then automatically the search template. In Experiments 2, two colors were presented, and a retro-cue indicated which of these was relevant for the upcoming search task. Crucially, before the search display appeared, we briefly presented one colored probe stimulus. The probe could match either the relevant-template color, the non-cued color (irrelevant), or be a new color not presented in the trial. We measured the pupil response to the probe as a signature of task relevance. Experiment 1 showed significantly smaller pupil size in response to probes matching the search template than for irrelevant colors. Experiment 2 replicated the template matching effect and allowed us to rule out that it was solely due to repetition priming. Taken together, we show that the pupil responds selectively to participants’ target template prior to search. Ubiquity Press 2018-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6634601/ /pubmed/31517185 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.12 Text en Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Olmos-Solis, Katya van Loon, Anouk M. Olivers, Christian N. L. Pupil Dilation Reflects Task Relevance Prior to Search |
title | Pupil Dilation Reflects Task Relevance Prior to Search |
title_full | Pupil Dilation Reflects Task Relevance Prior to Search |
title_fullStr | Pupil Dilation Reflects Task Relevance Prior to Search |
title_full_unstemmed | Pupil Dilation Reflects Task Relevance Prior to Search |
title_short | Pupil Dilation Reflects Task Relevance Prior to Search |
title_sort | pupil dilation reflects task relevance prior to search |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6634601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31517185 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.12 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT olmossoliskatya pupildilationreflectstaskrelevancepriortosearch AT vanloonanoukm pupildilationreflectstaskrelevancepriortosearch AT oliverschristiannl pupildilationreflectstaskrelevancepriortosearch |