Cargando…

Pupil Dilation Reflects Task Relevance Prior to Search

When observers search for a specific target, it is assumed that they activate a representation of the task relevant object in visual working memory (VWM). This representation – often referred to as the template – guides attention towards matching visual input. In two experiments we tested whether th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olmos-Solis, Katya, van Loon, Anouk M., Olivers, Christian N. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6634601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31517185
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.12
_version_ 1783435798766419968
author Olmos-Solis, Katya
van Loon, Anouk M.
Olivers, Christian N. L.
author_facet Olmos-Solis, Katya
van Loon, Anouk M.
Olivers, Christian N. L.
author_sort Olmos-Solis, Katya
collection PubMed
description When observers search for a specific target, it is assumed that they activate a representation of the task relevant object in visual working memory (VWM). This representation – often referred to as the template – guides attention towards matching visual input. In two experiments we tested whether the pupil response can be used to differentiate stimuli that match the task-relevant template from irrelevant input. Observers memorized a target color to be searched for in a multi-color visual search display, presented after a delay period. In Experiment 1, one color appeared at the start of the trial, which was then automatically the search template. In Experiments 2, two colors were presented, and a retro-cue indicated which of these was relevant for the upcoming search task. Crucially, before the search display appeared, we briefly presented one colored probe stimulus. The probe could match either the relevant-template color, the non-cued color (irrelevant), or be a new color not presented in the trial. We measured the pupil response to the probe as a signature of task relevance. Experiment 1 showed significantly smaller pupil size in response to probes matching the search template than for irrelevant colors. Experiment 2 replicated the template matching effect and allowed us to rule out that it was solely due to repetition priming. Taken together, we show that the pupil responds selectively to participants’ target template prior to search.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6634601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66346012019-09-12 Pupil Dilation Reflects Task Relevance Prior to Search Olmos-Solis, Katya van Loon, Anouk M. Olivers, Christian N. L. J Cogn Research Article When observers search for a specific target, it is assumed that they activate a representation of the task relevant object in visual working memory (VWM). This representation – often referred to as the template – guides attention towards matching visual input. In two experiments we tested whether the pupil response can be used to differentiate stimuli that match the task-relevant template from irrelevant input. Observers memorized a target color to be searched for in a multi-color visual search display, presented after a delay period. In Experiment 1, one color appeared at the start of the trial, which was then automatically the search template. In Experiments 2, two colors were presented, and a retro-cue indicated which of these was relevant for the upcoming search task. Crucially, before the search display appeared, we briefly presented one colored probe stimulus. The probe could match either the relevant-template color, the non-cued color (irrelevant), or be a new color not presented in the trial. We measured the pupil response to the probe as a signature of task relevance. Experiment 1 showed significantly smaller pupil size in response to probes matching the search template than for irrelevant colors. Experiment 2 replicated the template matching effect and allowed us to rule out that it was solely due to repetition priming. Taken together, we show that the pupil responds selectively to participants’ target template prior to search. Ubiquity Press 2018-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6634601/ /pubmed/31517185 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.12 Text en Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Olmos-Solis, Katya
van Loon, Anouk M.
Olivers, Christian N. L.
Pupil Dilation Reflects Task Relevance Prior to Search
title Pupil Dilation Reflects Task Relevance Prior to Search
title_full Pupil Dilation Reflects Task Relevance Prior to Search
title_fullStr Pupil Dilation Reflects Task Relevance Prior to Search
title_full_unstemmed Pupil Dilation Reflects Task Relevance Prior to Search
title_short Pupil Dilation Reflects Task Relevance Prior to Search
title_sort pupil dilation reflects task relevance prior to search
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6634601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31517185
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.12
work_keys_str_mv AT olmossoliskatya pupildilationreflectstaskrelevancepriortosearch
AT vanloonanoukm pupildilationreflectstaskrelevancepriortosearch
AT oliverschristiannl pupildilationreflectstaskrelevancepriortosearch