Cargando…

Efficacy of chemoradiotherapy versus radiation alone in patients with inoperable locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis compared radiotherapy (RT) versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (RT+CT) in treating patients with inoperable stage III non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, Google Scholar databases were searched until July 28, 2015 using the following...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hung, Ming-Szu, Wu, Yi-Fang, Chen, Yi-Chuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6635168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31277121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016167
_version_ 1783435822630961152
author Hung, Ming-Szu
Wu, Yi-Fang
Chen, Yi-Chuan
author_facet Hung, Ming-Szu
Wu, Yi-Fang
Chen, Yi-Chuan
author_sort Hung, Ming-Szu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis compared radiotherapy (RT) versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (RT+CT) in treating patients with inoperable stage III non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, Google Scholar databases were searched until July 28, 2015 using the following keywords non-small cell lung cancer, advanced cancer, incurable/inoperable/unresectable, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy/chemoradiation. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two-armed prospective studies that compared combined RT+CT with RT alone in patients with locally advanced (stage III) nonresectable NSCLC were eligible for inclusion. Treatment effect on overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) were evaluated. RESULTS: Ultimately, 13 RCT studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The 13 studies included a total of 1936 patients with incurable/inoperable stage III NSCLC, of which 975 received RT alone and 961 received RT+CT combination therapy. The average age ranged from 54 to 77 years. At 1 and 2 years after treatment, the pooled data reveal that patients receiving CT+RT combination therapy had higher overall survival (pooled hazard ratio (HR), 0.72; 95% CI, 0.62–0.84; P < .001; 1-yr: HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54–0.84; P < .001; 2-year: HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.45–0.73; P < .001), higher PFS (pooled HR, 0.73, 95% CI, 0.60–0.89; P = .002; 1-year: HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.24–0.53; P < .001; 2-year: HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.23–0.63; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Our findings show higher efficacy for concurrent CT+RT over RT alone in treating locally-advanced, unresectable stage III NSCLC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6635168
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66351682019-08-01 Efficacy of chemoradiotherapy versus radiation alone in patients with inoperable locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review Hung, Ming-Szu Wu, Yi-Fang Chen, Yi-Chuan Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis compared radiotherapy (RT) versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (RT+CT) in treating patients with inoperable stage III non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, Google Scholar databases were searched until July 28, 2015 using the following keywords non-small cell lung cancer, advanced cancer, incurable/inoperable/unresectable, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy/chemoradiation. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two-armed prospective studies that compared combined RT+CT with RT alone in patients with locally advanced (stage III) nonresectable NSCLC were eligible for inclusion. Treatment effect on overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) were evaluated. RESULTS: Ultimately, 13 RCT studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The 13 studies included a total of 1936 patients with incurable/inoperable stage III NSCLC, of which 975 received RT alone and 961 received RT+CT combination therapy. The average age ranged from 54 to 77 years. At 1 and 2 years after treatment, the pooled data reveal that patients receiving CT+RT combination therapy had higher overall survival (pooled hazard ratio (HR), 0.72; 95% CI, 0.62–0.84; P < .001; 1-yr: HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54–0.84; P < .001; 2-year: HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.45–0.73; P < .001), higher PFS (pooled HR, 0.73, 95% CI, 0.60–0.89; P = .002; 1-year: HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.24–0.53; P < .001; 2-year: HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.23–0.63; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Our findings show higher efficacy for concurrent CT+RT over RT alone in treating locally-advanced, unresectable stage III NSCLC. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6635168/ /pubmed/31277121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016167 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Hung, Ming-Szu
Wu, Yi-Fang
Chen, Yi-Chuan
Efficacy of chemoradiotherapy versus radiation alone in patients with inoperable locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review
title Efficacy of chemoradiotherapy versus radiation alone in patients with inoperable locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review
title_full Efficacy of chemoradiotherapy versus radiation alone in patients with inoperable locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review
title_fullStr Efficacy of chemoradiotherapy versus radiation alone in patients with inoperable locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of chemoradiotherapy versus radiation alone in patients with inoperable locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review
title_short Efficacy of chemoradiotherapy versus radiation alone in patients with inoperable locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review
title_sort efficacy of chemoradiotherapy versus radiation alone in patients with inoperable locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6635168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31277121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016167
work_keys_str_mv AT hungmingszu efficacyofchemoradiotherapyversusradiationaloneinpatientswithinoperablelocallyadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT wuyifang efficacyofchemoradiotherapyversusradiationaloneinpatientswithinoperablelocallyadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT chenyichuan efficacyofchemoradiotherapyversusradiationaloneinpatientswithinoperablelocallyadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview