Cargando…
Mortality rate and other clinical features observed in Open vs closed format intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Nowadays most of the intensive care units (ICUs) operate as a closed format in comparison to an open format. The new concept of a closed ICU is where patients are admitted under the full responsibility of a trained intensivist, whereas an open ICU is where patients are admitted under the...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6635169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31277148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016261 |
_version_ | 1783435822864793600 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Qian Du, Jin Long Shao, Feng |
author_facet | Yang, Qian Du, Jin Long Shao, Feng |
author_sort | Yang, Qian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Nowadays most of the intensive care units (ICUs) operate as a closed format in comparison to an open format. The new concept of a closed ICU is where patients are admitted under the full responsibility of a trained intensivist, whereas an open ICU is where patients are admitted under the care of another attending physician and intensivists are just available for consultation. In this analysis, we aimed to systematically compare mortality rate and other clinical features observed in open vs closed ICU formats. METHODS: Biomedical and pharmacological bibliographic database Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), the Cochrane Central and www.ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for required English publications. Mortality, the frequency of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, central line, arterial line and pulmonary arterial catheter were assessed respectively. Statistical analysis was carried out by the RevMan software. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to represent the data following analysis. RESULTS: Five studies with a total number of 6160 participants enrolled between years 1992 to 2007 were included. Results of this analysis showed that mortality rate was significantly higher in the open format ICU (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.17–1.48; P = .00001) (using a fixed effect model) and (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.09–1.59; P = .005) (using a random effect model). Closed format ICUs were associated with significantly higher number of patients that required central line (OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.34–0.92; P = .02). Patients requiring mechanical ventilation (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.65–1.78; P = .77), patients requiring arterial line (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.49–2.29; P = .89) and patients requiring pulmonary arterial catheter (OR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.40–1.87; P = .71) were similar in the open vs the closed setting. CONCLUSION: This analysis showed that mortality rate was significantly higher in an open as compared to a closed format ICU. However, the frequency of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, arterial line and pulmonary arterial catheter was similarly observed. Larger trials are expected to further confirm those hypotheses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6635169 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66351692019-08-01 Mortality rate and other clinical features observed in Open vs closed format intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis Yang, Qian Du, Jin Long Shao, Feng Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: Nowadays most of the intensive care units (ICUs) operate as a closed format in comparison to an open format. The new concept of a closed ICU is where patients are admitted under the full responsibility of a trained intensivist, whereas an open ICU is where patients are admitted under the care of another attending physician and intensivists are just available for consultation. In this analysis, we aimed to systematically compare mortality rate and other clinical features observed in open vs closed ICU formats. METHODS: Biomedical and pharmacological bibliographic database Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), the Cochrane Central and www.ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for required English publications. Mortality, the frequency of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, central line, arterial line and pulmonary arterial catheter were assessed respectively. Statistical analysis was carried out by the RevMan software. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to represent the data following analysis. RESULTS: Five studies with a total number of 6160 participants enrolled between years 1992 to 2007 were included. Results of this analysis showed that mortality rate was significantly higher in the open format ICU (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.17–1.48; P = .00001) (using a fixed effect model) and (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.09–1.59; P = .005) (using a random effect model). Closed format ICUs were associated with significantly higher number of patients that required central line (OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.34–0.92; P = .02). Patients requiring mechanical ventilation (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.65–1.78; P = .77), patients requiring arterial line (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.49–2.29; P = .89) and patients requiring pulmonary arterial catheter (OR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.40–1.87; P = .71) were similar in the open vs the closed setting. CONCLUSION: This analysis showed that mortality rate was significantly higher in an open as compared to a closed format ICU. However, the frequency of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, arterial line and pulmonary arterial catheter was similarly observed. Larger trials are expected to further confirm those hypotheses. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6635169/ /pubmed/31277148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016261 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yang, Qian Du, Jin Long Shao, Feng Mortality rate and other clinical features observed in Open vs closed format intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Mortality rate and other clinical features observed in Open vs closed format intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Mortality rate and other clinical features observed in Open vs closed format intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Mortality rate and other clinical features observed in Open vs closed format intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Mortality rate and other clinical features observed in Open vs closed format intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Mortality rate and other clinical features observed in Open vs closed format intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | mortality rate and other clinical features observed in open vs closed format intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6635169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31277148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016261 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangqian mortalityrateandotherclinicalfeaturesobservedinopenvsclosedformatintensivecareunitsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dujinlong mortalityrateandotherclinicalfeaturesobservedinopenvsclosedformatintensivecareunitsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shaofeng mortalityrateandotherclinicalfeaturesobservedinopenvsclosedformatintensivecareunitsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |