Cargando…

Getting Better Results in Facelifting

The facelift has significantly evolved over the past several decades. What was once considered a skin only operation is now a sophisticated, elegant procedure that requires meticulous preoperative analysis, understanding of underlying anatomically based aging changes, and extreme attention to detail...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rohrich, Rod J., Sinno, Sammy, Vaca, Elbert E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6635200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31624678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002270
_version_ 1783435830330654720
author Rohrich, Rod J.
Sinno, Sammy
Vaca, Elbert E.
author_facet Rohrich, Rod J.
Sinno, Sammy
Vaca, Elbert E.
author_sort Rohrich, Rod J.
collection PubMed
description The facelift has significantly evolved over the past several decades. What was once considered a skin only operation is now a sophisticated, elegant procedure that requires meticulous preoperative analysis, understanding of underlying anatomically based aging changes, and extreme attention to detail. According to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, 125,697 facelifts were performed in 2017. It is not surprising that given these advances that facial rejuvenation surgery is still a very common procedure with a high degree of patient satisfaction despite the increase in nonsurgical facial aging treatments. With an improved understanding of facial anatomy including the facial retaining ligaments and intervening superficial and deep fat compartments, the modern facelift requires an anatomically targeted approach. Furthermore, the modern facelift surgeon must achieve consistently excellent results with reasonably little downtime while being aware of methods to improve the safety of this popular elective procedure. Hematoma is the most common complication after rhytidectomy with an incidence between 0.9% and 9%, with a higher incidence in males. Other potential complications include seroma, nerve injury, skin flap necrosis, siaolocele as a consequence of submandibular gland debulking, and skin flap rhytid and hairline distortion. This review aims to discuss safe, consistent, and reproducible methods to achieve success with facelift.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6635200
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66352002019-10-17 Getting Better Results in Facelifting Rohrich, Rod J. Sinno, Sammy Vaca, Elbert E. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Review Article The facelift has significantly evolved over the past several decades. What was once considered a skin only operation is now a sophisticated, elegant procedure that requires meticulous preoperative analysis, understanding of underlying anatomically based aging changes, and extreme attention to detail. According to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, 125,697 facelifts were performed in 2017. It is not surprising that given these advances that facial rejuvenation surgery is still a very common procedure with a high degree of patient satisfaction despite the increase in nonsurgical facial aging treatments. With an improved understanding of facial anatomy including the facial retaining ligaments and intervening superficial and deep fat compartments, the modern facelift requires an anatomically targeted approach. Furthermore, the modern facelift surgeon must achieve consistently excellent results with reasonably little downtime while being aware of methods to improve the safety of this popular elective procedure. Hematoma is the most common complication after rhytidectomy with an incidence between 0.9% and 9%, with a higher incidence in males. Other potential complications include seroma, nerve injury, skin flap necrosis, siaolocele as a consequence of submandibular gland debulking, and skin flap rhytid and hairline distortion. This review aims to discuss safe, consistent, and reproducible methods to achieve success with facelift. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6635200/ /pubmed/31624678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002270 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Review Article
Rohrich, Rod J.
Sinno, Sammy
Vaca, Elbert E.
Getting Better Results in Facelifting
title Getting Better Results in Facelifting
title_full Getting Better Results in Facelifting
title_fullStr Getting Better Results in Facelifting
title_full_unstemmed Getting Better Results in Facelifting
title_short Getting Better Results in Facelifting
title_sort getting better results in facelifting
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6635200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31624678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002270
work_keys_str_mv AT rohrichrodj gettingbetterresultsinfacelifting
AT sinnosammy gettingbetterresultsinfacelifting
AT vacaelberte gettingbetterresultsinfacelifting