Cargando…
Getting Better Results in Facelifting
The facelift has significantly evolved over the past several decades. What was once considered a skin only operation is now a sophisticated, elegant procedure that requires meticulous preoperative analysis, understanding of underlying anatomically based aging changes, and extreme attention to detail...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6635200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31624678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002270 |
_version_ | 1783435830330654720 |
---|---|
author | Rohrich, Rod J. Sinno, Sammy Vaca, Elbert E. |
author_facet | Rohrich, Rod J. Sinno, Sammy Vaca, Elbert E. |
author_sort | Rohrich, Rod J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The facelift has significantly evolved over the past several decades. What was once considered a skin only operation is now a sophisticated, elegant procedure that requires meticulous preoperative analysis, understanding of underlying anatomically based aging changes, and extreme attention to detail. According to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, 125,697 facelifts were performed in 2017. It is not surprising that given these advances that facial rejuvenation surgery is still a very common procedure with a high degree of patient satisfaction despite the increase in nonsurgical facial aging treatments. With an improved understanding of facial anatomy including the facial retaining ligaments and intervening superficial and deep fat compartments, the modern facelift requires an anatomically targeted approach. Furthermore, the modern facelift surgeon must achieve consistently excellent results with reasonably little downtime while being aware of methods to improve the safety of this popular elective procedure. Hematoma is the most common complication after rhytidectomy with an incidence between 0.9% and 9%, with a higher incidence in males. Other potential complications include seroma, nerve injury, skin flap necrosis, siaolocele as a consequence of submandibular gland debulking, and skin flap rhytid and hairline distortion. This review aims to discuss safe, consistent, and reproducible methods to achieve success with facelift. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6635200 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66352002019-10-17 Getting Better Results in Facelifting Rohrich, Rod J. Sinno, Sammy Vaca, Elbert E. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Review Article The facelift has significantly evolved over the past several decades. What was once considered a skin only operation is now a sophisticated, elegant procedure that requires meticulous preoperative analysis, understanding of underlying anatomically based aging changes, and extreme attention to detail. According to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, 125,697 facelifts were performed in 2017. It is not surprising that given these advances that facial rejuvenation surgery is still a very common procedure with a high degree of patient satisfaction despite the increase in nonsurgical facial aging treatments. With an improved understanding of facial anatomy including the facial retaining ligaments and intervening superficial and deep fat compartments, the modern facelift requires an anatomically targeted approach. Furthermore, the modern facelift surgeon must achieve consistently excellent results with reasonably little downtime while being aware of methods to improve the safety of this popular elective procedure. Hematoma is the most common complication after rhytidectomy with an incidence between 0.9% and 9%, with a higher incidence in males. Other potential complications include seroma, nerve injury, skin flap necrosis, siaolocele as a consequence of submandibular gland debulking, and skin flap rhytid and hairline distortion. This review aims to discuss safe, consistent, and reproducible methods to achieve success with facelift. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6635200/ /pubmed/31624678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002270 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Rohrich, Rod J. Sinno, Sammy Vaca, Elbert E. Getting Better Results in Facelifting |
title | Getting Better Results in Facelifting |
title_full | Getting Better Results in Facelifting |
title_fullStr | Getting Better Results in Facelifting |
title_full_unstemmed | Getting Better Results in Facelifting |
title_short | Getting Better Results in Facelifting |
title_sort | getting better results in facelifting |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6635200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31624678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002270 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rohrichrodj gettingbetterresultsinfacelifting AT sinnosammy gettingbetterresultsinfacelifting AT vacaelberte gettingbetterresultsinfacelifting |