Cargando…

Acetabular reconstruction for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty using Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement devices—case–control study with factors related to poor outcomes of surgery

Kerboull-type acetabular support rings (KT) and allogenic bone graft were used for severe periacetabular bone loss with primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this case–control study is to evaluate the risk factors related to poor outcomes of surgery. Sixty patients underw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Masumoto, Yoshinobu, Fukunishi, Shigeo, Fukui, Tomokazu, Takeda, Yu, Nishio, Shoji, Fujihara, Yuki, Okahisa, Shohei, Okada, Taishi, Yoshiya, Shinichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6635283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31277106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016090
_version_ 1783435850313367552
author Masumoto, Yoshinobu
Fukunishi, Shigeo
Fukui, Tomokazu
Takeda, Yu
Nishio, Shoji
Fujihara, Yuki
Okahisa, Shohei
Okada, Taishi
Yoshiya, Shinichi
author_facet Masumoto, Yoshinobu
Fukunishi, Shigeo
Fukui, Tomokazu
Takeda, Yu
Nishio, Shoji
Fujihara, Yuki
Okahisa, Shohei
Okada, Taishi
Yoshiya, Shinichi
author_sort Masumoto, Yoshinobu
collection PubMed
description Kerboull-type acetabular support rings (KT) and allogenic bone graft were used for severe periacetabular bone loss with primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this case–control study is to evaluate the risk factors related to poor outcomes of surgery. Sixty patients underwent primary THA and revision THA using allogenic bone graft with KT for large acetabular deficiency. These patients were retrospectively evaluated postoperatively and followed-up by radiograph. The minimum follow-up period was 4 years and averaged 7 years. A radiological failure was defined by the following criteria: 1).. substantial migration defined as change in the angle of inclination of more than 5 degrees or migration of more than 5 mm, 2).. breakage of the screw or device, 3).. acetabular revision due to aseptic loosening. Expected risk factors were defined as female, age >75 years, body mass index (BMI) >25%, medical history of hypertension, renal failure, liver steatosis, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, cardiac infarction, smoking, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery (AAOS) classification III or IV, bleeding>500 mL, time of surgery >3hours, high hip center-type KT, inclination of KT >45 degrees, screw angle >25 degrees, morselized bone graft, Kawanabe's classification stage 3 or 4 and revision surgery. Nineteen hips (31.6%) revealed radiological failure according to our criteria, and revision THA was performed in 2 hips (3.3%). In the statistical analysis, morselized bone graft and high hip center-type KT were identified as factors of poor outcomes of surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6635283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66352832019-08-01 Acetabular reconstruction for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty using Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement devices—case–control study with factors related to poor outcomes of surgery Masumoto, Yoshinobu Fukunishi, Shigeo Fukui, Tomokazu Takeda, Yu Nishio, Shoji Fujihara, Yuki Okahisa, Shohei Okada, Taishi Yoshiya, Shinichi Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article Kerboull-type acetabular support rings (KT) and allogenic bone graft were used for severe periacetabular bone loss with primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this case–control study is to evaluate the risk factors related to poor outcomes of surgery. Sixty patients underwent primary THA and revision THA using allogenic bone graft with KT for large acetabular deficiency. These patients were retrospectively evaluated postoperatively and followed-up by radiograph. The minimum follow-up period was 4 years and averaged 7 years. A radiological failure was defined by the following criteria: 1).. substantial migration defined as change in the angle of inclination of more than 5 degrees or migration of more than 5 mm, 2).. breakage of the screw or device, 3).. acetabular revision due to aseptic loosening. Expected risk factors were defined as female, age >75 years, body mass index (BMI) >25%, medical history of hypertension, renal failure, liver steatosis, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, cardiac infarction, smoking, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery (AAOS) classification III or IV, bleeding>500 mL, time of surgery >3hours, high hip center-type KT, inclination of KT >45 degrees, screw angle >25 degrees, morselized bone graft, Kawanabe's classification stage 3 or 4 and revision surgery. Nineteen hips (31.6%) revealed radiological failure according to our criteria, and revision THA was performed in 2 hips (3.3%). In the statistical analysis, morselized bone graft and high hip center-type KT were identified as factors of poor outcomes of surgery. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6635283/ /pubmed/31277106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016090 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Masumoto, Yoshinobu
Fukunishi, Shigeo
Fukui, Tomokazu
Takeda, Yu
Nishio, Shoji
Fujihara, Yuki
Okahisa, Shohei
Okada, Taishi
Yoshiya, Shinichi
Acetabular reconstruction for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty using Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement devices—case–control study with factors related to poor outcomes of surgery
title Acetabular reconstruction for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty using Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement devices—case–control study with factors related to poor outcomes of surgery
title_full Acetabular reconstruction for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty using Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement devices—case–control study with factors related to poor outcomes of surgery
title_fullStr Acetabular reconstruction for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty using Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement devices—case–control study with factors related to poor outcomes of surgery
title_full_unstemmed Acetabular reconstruction for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty using Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement devices—case–control study with factors related to poor outcomes of surgery
title_short Acetabular reconstruction for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty using Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement devices—case–control study with factors related to poor outcomes of surgery
title_sort acetabular reconstruction for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty using kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement devices—case–control study with factors related to poor outcomes of surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6635283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31277106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016090
work_keys_str_mv AT masumotoyoshinobu acetabularreconstructionforprimaryandrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyusingkerboulltypeacetabularreinforcementdevicescasecontrolstudywithfactorsrelatedtopooroutcomesofsurgery
AT fukunishishigeo acetabularreconstructionforprimaryandrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyusingkerboulltypeacetabularreinforcementdevicescasecontrolstudywithfactorsrelatedtopooroutcomesofsurgery
AT fukuitomokazu acetabularreconstructionforprimaryandrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyusingkerboulltypeacetabularreinforcementdevicescasecontrolstudywithfactorsrelatedtopooroutcomesofsurgery
AT takedayu acetabularreconstructionforprimaryandrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyusingkerboulltypeacetabularreinforcementdevicescasecontrolstudywithfactorsrelatedtopooroutcomesofsurgery
AT nishioshoji acetabularreconstructionforprimaryandrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyusingkerboulltypeacetabularreinforcementdevicescasecontrolstudywithfactorsrelatedtopooroutcomesofsurgery
AT fujiharayuki acetabularreconstructionforprimaryandrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyusingkerboulltypeacetabularreinforcementdevicescasecontrolstudywithfactorsrelatedtopooroutcomesofsurgery
AT okahisashohei acetabularreconstructionforprimaryandrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyusingkerboulltypeacetabularreinforcementdevicescasecontrolstudywithfactorsrelatedtopooroutcomesofsurgery
AT okadataishi acetabularreconstructionforprimaryandrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyusingkerboulltypeacetabularreinforcementdevicescasecontrolstudywithfactorsrelatedtopooroutcomesofsurgery
AT yoshiyashinichi acetabularreconstructionforprimaryandrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyusingkerboulltypeacetabularreinforcementdevicescasecontrolstudywithfactorsrelatedtopooroutcomesofsurgery