Cargando…

Simultaneous EEG-fMRI: Evaluating the Effect of the EEG Cap-Cabling Configuration on the Gradient Artifact

Electroencephalography (EEG) data recorded during simultaneous EEG-fMRI experiments are contaminated by large gradient artifacts (GA). The amplitude of the GA depends on the area of the wire loops formed by the EEG leads, as well as on the rate of switching of the magnetic field gradients, which are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chowdhury, Muhammad E. H., Khandakar, Amith, Mullinger, Karen J., Al-Emadi, Nasser, Bowtell, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6635558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31354408
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00690
_version_ 1783435906268528640
author Chowdhury, Muhammad E. H.
Khandakar, Amith
Mullinger, Karen J.
Al-Emadi, Nasser
Bowtell, Richard
author_facet Chowdhury, Muhammad E. H.
Khandakar, Amith
Mullinger, Karen J.
Al-Emadi, Nasser
Bowtell, Richard
author_sort Chowdhury, Muhammad E. H.
collection PubMed
description Electroencephalography (EEG) data recorded during simultaneous EEG-fMRI experiments are contaminated by large gradient artifacts (GA). The amplitude of the GA depends on the area of the wire loops formed by the EEG leads, as well as on the rate of switching of the magnetic field gradients, which are essential for MR imaging. Average artifact subtraction (AAS), the most commonly used method for GA correction, relies on the EEG amplifier having a large enough dynamic range to characterize the artifact voltages. Low-pass filtering (250 Hz cut-off) is generally used to attenuate the high-frequency voltage fluctuations of the GA, but even with this precaution channel saturation can occur, particularly during acquisition of high spatial resolution MRI data. Previous work has shown that the ribbon cable, used to connect the EEG cap and amplifier, makes a significant contribution to the GA, since the cable geometry produces large effective wire-loop areas. However, by appropriately connecting the wires of the ribbon cable to the EEG cap it should be possible to minimize the overall range and root mean square (RMS) amplitude of the GA by producing partial cancelation of the cap and cable contributions. Here by modifying the connections of the EEG cap to a 1 m ribbon cable we were able to reduce the range of the GA for a high-resolution coronal echo planar Imaging (EPI) acquisition by a factor of ∼ 1.6 and by a factor of ∼ 1.15 for a standard axial EPI acquisition. These changes could potentially be translated into a reduction in the required dynamic range, an increase in the EEG bandwidth or an increase in the achievable image resolution without saturation, all of which could be beneficially exploited in EEG-fMRI studies. The re-wiring could also prevent the system from saturating when small subject movements occur using the standard recording bandwidth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6635558
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66355582019-07-26 Simultaneous EEG-fMRI: Evaluating the Effect of the EEG Cap-Cabling Configuration on the Gradient Artifact Chowdhury, Muhammad E. H. Khandakar, Amith Mullinger, Karen J. Al-Emadi, Nasser Bowtell, Richard Front Neurosci Neuroscience Electroencephalography (EEG) data recorded during simultaneous EEG-fMRI experiments are contaminated by large gradient artifacts (GA). The amplitude of the GA depends on the area of the wire loops formed by the EEG leads, as well as on the rate of switching of the magnetic field gradients, which are essential for MR imaging. Average artifact subtraction (AAS), the most commonly used method for GA correction, relies on the EEG amplifier having a large enough dynamic range to characterize the artifact voltages. Low-pass filtering (250 Hz cut-off) is generally used to attenuate the high-frequency voltage fluctuations of the GA, but even with this precaution channel saturation can occur, particularly during acquisition of high spatial resolution MRI data. Previous work has shown that the ribbon cable, used to connect the EEG cap and amplifier, makes a significant contribution to the GA, since the cable geometry produces large effective wire-loop areas. However, by appropriately connecting the wires of the ribbon cable to the EEG cap it should be possible to minimize the overall range and root mean square (RMS) amplitude of the GA by producing partial cancelation of the cap and cable contributions. Here by modifying the connections of the EEG cap to a 1 m ribbon cable we were able to reduce the range of the GA for a high-resolution coronal echo planar Imaging (EPI) acquisition by a factor of ∼ 1.6 and by a factor of ∼ 1.15 for a standard axial EPI acquisition. These changes could potentially be translated into a reduction in the required dynamic range, an increase in the EEG bandwidth or an increase in the achievable image resolution without saturation, all of which could be beneficially exploited in EEG-fMRI studies. The re-wiring could also prevent the system from saturating when small subject movements occur using the standard recording bandwidth. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6635558/ /pubmed/31354408 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00690 Text en Copyright © 2019 Chowdhury, Khandakar, Mullinger, Al-Emadi and Bowtell. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Chowdhury, Muhammad E. H.
Khandakar, Amith
Mullinger, Karen J.
Al-Emadi, Nasser
Bowtell, Richard
Simultaneous EEG-fMRI: Evaluating the Effect of the EEG Cap-Cabling Configuration on the Gradient Artifact
title Simultaneous EEG-fMRI: Evaluating the Effect of the EEG Cap-Cabling Configuration on the Gradient Artifact
title_full Simultaneous EEG-fMRI: Evaluating the Effect of the EEG Cap-Cabling Configuration on the Gradient Artifact
title_fullStr Simultaneous EEG-fMRI: Evaluating the Effect of the EEG Cap-Cabling Configuration on the Gradient Artifact
title_full_unstemmed Simultaneous EEG-fMRI: Evaluating the Effect of the EEG Cap-Cabling Configuration on the Gradient Artifact
title_short Simultaneous EEG-fMRI: Evaluating the Effect of the EEG Cap-Cabling Configuration on the Gradient Artifact
title_sort simultaneous eeg-fmri: evaluating the effect of the eeg cap-cabling configuration on the gradient artifact
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6635558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31354408
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00690
work_keys_str_mv AT chowdhurymuhammadeh simultaneouseegfmrievaluatingtheeffectoftheeegcapcablingconfigurationonthegradientartifact
AT khandakaramith simultaneouseegfmrievaluatingtheeffectoftheeegcapcablingconfigurationonthegradientartifact
AT mullingerkarenj simultaneouseegfmrievaluatingtheeffectoftheeegcapcablingconfigurationonthegradientartifact
AT alemadinasser simultaneouseegfmrievaluatingtheeffectoftheeegcapcablingconfigurationonthegradientartifact
AT bowtellrichard simultaneouseegfmrievaluatingtheeffectoftheeegcapcablingconfigurationonthegradientartifact