Cargando…

How much do we really lose?—Yield losses in the proximity of natural landscape elements in agricultural landscapes

Natural landscape elements (NLEs) in agricultural landscapes contribute to biodiversity and ecosystem services, but are also regarded as an obstacle for large‐scale agricultural production. However, the effects of NLEs on crop yield have rarely been measured. Here, we investigated how different bord...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raatz, Larissa, Bacchi, Nina, Pirhofer Walzl, Karin, Glemnitz, Michael, Müller, Marina E. H., Joshi, Jasmin, Scherber, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6635954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31346444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5370
_version_ 1783435974392414208
author Raatz, Larissa
Bacchi, Nina
Pirhofer Walzl, Karin
Glemnitz, Michael
Müller, Marina E. H.
Joshi, Jasmin
Scherber, Christoph
author_facet Raatz, Larissa
Bacchi, Nina
Pirhofer Walzl, Karin
Glemnitz, Michael
Müller, Marina E. H.
Joshi, Jasmin
Scherber, Christoph
author_sort Raatz, Larissa
collection PubMed
description Natural landscape elements (NLEs) in agricultural landscapes contribute to biodiversity and ecosystem services, but are also regarded as an obstacle for large‐scale agricultural production. However, the effects of NLEs on crop yield have rarely been measured. Here, we investigated how different bordering structures, such as agricultural roads, field‐to‐field borders, forests, hedgerows, and kettle holes, influence agricultural yields. We hypothesized that (a) yield values at field borders differ from mid‐field yields and that (b) the extent of this change in yields depends on the bordering structure. We measured winter wheat yields along transects with log‐scaled distances from the border into the agricultural field within two intensively managed agricultural landscapes in Germany (2014 near Göttingen, and 2015–2017 in the Uckermark). We observed a yield loss adjacent to every investigated bordering structure of 11%–38% in comparison with mid‐field yields. However, depending on the bordering structure, this yield loss disappeared at different distances. While the proximity of kettle holes did not affect yields more than neighboring agricultural fields, woody landscape elements had strong effects on winter wheat yields. Notably, 95% of mid‐field yields could already be reached at a distance of 11.3 m from a kettle hole and at a distance of 17.8 m from hedgerows as well as forest borders. Our findings suggest that yield losses are especially relevant directly adjacent to woody landscape elements, but not adjacent to in‐field water bodies. This highlights the potential to simultaneously counteract yield losses close to the field border and enhance biodiversity by combining different NLEs in agricultural landscapes such as creating strips of extensive grassland vegetation between woody landscape elements and agricultural fields. In conclusion, our results can be used to quantify ecocompensations to find optimal solutions for the delivery of productive and regulative ecosystem services in heterogeneous agricultural landscapes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6635954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66359542019-07-25 How much do we really lose?—Yield losses in the proximity of natural landscape elements in agricultural landscapes Raatz, Larissa Bacchi, Nina Pirhofer Walzl, Karin Glemnitz, Michael Müller, Marina E. H. Joshi, Jasmin Scherber, Christoph Ecol Evol Original Research Natural landscape elements (NLEs) in agricultural landscapes contribute to biodiversity and ecosystem services, but are also regarded as an obstacle for large‐scale agricultural production. However, the effects of NLEs on crop yield have rarely been measured. Here, we investigated how different bordering structures, such as agricultural roads, field‐to‐field borders, forests, hedgerows, and kettle holes, influence agricultural yields. We hypothesized that (a) yield values at field borders differ from mid‐field yields and that (b) the extent of this change in yields depends on the bordering structure. We measured winter wheat yields along transects with log‐scaled distances from the border into the agricultural field within two intensively managed agricultural landscapes in Germany (2014 near Göttingen, and 2015–2017 in the Uckermark). We observed a yield loss adjacent to every investigated bordering structure of 11%–38% in comparison with mid‐field yields. However, depending on the bordering structure, this yield loss disappeared at different distances. While the proximity of kettle holes did not affect yields more than neighboring agricultural fields, woody landscape elements had strong effects on winter wheat yields. Notably, 95% of mid‐field yields could already be reached at a distance of 11.3 m from a kettle hole and at a distance of 17.8 m from hedgerows as well as forest borders. Our findings suggest that yield losses are especially relevant directly adjacent to woody landscape elements, but not adjacent to in‐field water bodies. This highlights the potential to simultaneously counteract yield losses close to the field border and enhance biodiversity by combining different NLEs in agricultural landscapes such as creating strips of extensive grassland vegetation between woody landscape elements and agricultural fields. In conclusion, our results can be used to quantify ecocompensations to find optimal solutions for the delivery of productive and regulative ecosystem services in heterogeneous agricultural landscapes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6635954/ /pubmed/31346444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5370 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Raatz, Larissa
Bacchi, Nina
Pirhofer Walzl, Karin
Glemnitz, Michael
Müller, Marina E. H.
Joshi, Jasmin
Scherber, Christoph
How much do we really lose?—Yield losses in the proximity of natural landscape elements in agricultural landscapes
title How much do we really lose?—Yield losses in the proximity of natural landscape elements in agricultural landscapes
title_full How much do we really lose?—Yield losses in the proximity of natural landscape elements in agricultural landscapes
title_fullStr How much do we really lose?—Yield losses in the proximity of natural landscape elements in agricultural landscapes
title_full_unstemmed How much do we really lose?—Yield losses in the proximity of natural landscape elements in agricultural landscapes
title_short How much do we really lose?—Yield losses in the proximity of natural landscape elements in agricultural landscapes
title_sort how much do we really lose?—yield losses in the proximity of natural landscape elements in agricultural landscapes
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6635954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31346444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5370
work_keys_str_mv AT raatzlarissa howmuchdowereallyloseyieldlossesintheproximityofnaturallandscapeelementsinagriculturallandscapes
AT bacchinina howmuchdowereallyloseyieldlossesintheproximityofnaturallandscapeelementsinagriculturallandscapes
AT pirhoferwalzlkarin howmuchdowereallyloseyieldlossesintheproximityofnaturallandscapeelementsinagriculturallandscapes
AT glemnitzmichael howmuchdowereallyloseyieldlossesintheproximityofnaturallandscapeelementsinagriculturallandscapes
AT mullermarinaeh howmuchdowereallyloseyieldlossesintheproximityofnaturallandscapeelementsinagriculturallandscapes
AT joshijasmin howmuchdowereallyloseyieldlossesintheproximityofnaturallandscapeelementsinagriculturallandscapes
AT scherberchristoph howmuchdowereallyloseyieldlossesintheproximityofnaturallandscapeelementsinagriculturallandscapes