Cargando…

Ability to Propose Optimal Prosthetic Rehabilitation can be Improved by Discussion between the Dentist and Radiation Oncologist Regarding Upstream Dosimetry

Objective Improvement of dental rehabilitation for patients who have undergone radiation therapy requires knowledge of the dose in the maxillary and mandible bones. Materials and Methods Forty-three patients with head and neck cancers underwent evaluation for dental rehabilitation before radiation t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rouers, Mélanie, Bornert, Fabien, Truntzer, Pierre, Dubourg, Sarah, Bourrier, Cyrielle, Antoni, Delphine, Noël, Georges
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6635961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31170766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1688523
_version_ 1783435975603519488
author Rouers, Mélanie
Bornert, Fabien
Truntzer, Pierre
Dubourg, Sarah
Bourrier, Cyrielle
Antoni, Delphine
Noël, Georges
author_facet Rouers, Mélanie
Bornert, Fabien
Truntzer, Pierre
Dubourg, Sarah
Bourrier, Cyrielle
Antoni, Delphine
Noël, Georges
author_sort Rouers, Mélanie
collection PubMed
description Objective Improvement of dental rehabilitation for patients who have undergone radiation therapy requires knowledge of the dose in the maxillary and mandible bones. Materials and Methods Forty-three patients with head and neck cancers underwent evaluation for dental rehabilitation before radiation treatment dosimetry. The delivered dose to the maxilla and mandible was determined. From the dose data in the literature, three levels of risk of implant failure were defined. According to the delivered doses, the authors calculated the percentage of patients who could be fully rehabilitated with an implant, as proposed by the dentist before radiation planning. Results Before dosimetry calculation, all of the completely edentulous arches and 94 partially edentulous (PESs) sextants could be optimally rehabilitated. After dose calculation, among the 14 arches of 7 patients who were completely edentulous, according to the mean and maximal delivered doses, 11 arches (78.6%) and 7 arches (50%) could receive an optimal prosthesis, respectively. For the three patients, who were PESs but with one arch that was completely edentulous, according to the mean and maximal delivered doses, one arch for each dose condition could receive an optimal prosthesis. Among the 94 PESs sextants, according to the mean and maximal delivered doses, 41 (43.6%) and 24 (25.5%) sextants could receive an optimal prosthesis, respectively. Conclusion By determining the sites of implantation before dosimetry, the radiation oncologist could shield specified areas, potentially improving the possibilities for dental rehabilitation. The dialogue between the dentist and the radiation oncologist can improve the possibilities for implants and decrease the risk of unsafe implantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6635961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66359612019-07-18 Ability to Propose Optimal Prosthetic Rehabilitation can be Improved by Discussion between the Dentist and Radiation Oncologist Regarding Upstream Dosimetry Rouers, Mélanie Bornert, Fabien Truntzer, Pierre Dubourg, Sarah Bourrier, Cyrielle Antoni, Delphine Noël, Georges Eur J Dent Objective Improvement of dental rehabilitation for patients who have undergone radiation therapy requires knowledge of the dose in the maxillary and mandible bones. Materials and Methods Forty-three patients with head and neck cancers underwent evaluation for dental rehabilitation before radiation treatment dosimetry. The delivered dose to the maxilla and mandible was determined. From the dose data in the literature, three levels of risk of implant failure were defined. According to the delivered doses, the authors calculated the percentage of patients who could be fully rehabilitated with an implant, as proposed by the dentist before radiation planning. Results Before dosimetry calculation, all of the completely edentulous arches and 94 partially edentulous (PESs) sextants could be optimally rehabilitated. After dose calculation, among the 14 arches of 7 patients who were completely edentulous, according to the mean and maximal delivered doses, 11 arches (78.6%) and 7 arches (50%) could receive an optimal prosthesis, respectively. For the three patients, who were PESs but with one arch that was completely edentulous, according to the mean and maximal delivered doses, one arch for each dose condition could receive an optimal prosthesis. Among the 94 PESs sextants, according to the mean and maximal delivered doses, 41 (43.6%) and 24 (25.5%) sextants could receive an optimal prosthesis, respectively. Conclusion By determining the sites of implantation before dosimetry, the radiation oncologist could shield specified areas, potentially improving the possibilities for dental rehabilitation. The dialogue between the dentist and the radiation oncologist can improve the possibilities for implants and decrease the risk of unsafe implantation. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. 2019-02 2019-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6635961/ /pubmed/31170766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1688523 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Rouers, Mélanie
Bornert, Fabien
Truntzer, Pierre
Dubourg, Sarah
Bourrier, Cyrielle
Antoni, Delphine
Noël, Georges
Ability to Propose Optimal Prosthetic Rehabilitation can be Improved by Discussion between the Dentist and Radiation Oncologist Regarding Upstream Dosimetry
title Ability to Propose Optimal Prosthetic Rehabilitation can be Improved by Discussion between the Dentist and Radiation Oncologist Regarding Upstream Dosimetry
title_full Ability to Propose Optimal Prosthetic Rehabilitation can be Improved by Discussion between the Dentist and Radiation Oncologist Regarding Upstream Dosimetry
title_fullStr Ability to Propose Optimal Prosthetic Rehabilitation can be Improved by Discussion between the Dentist and Radiation Oncologist Regarding Upstream Dosimetry
title_full_unstemmed Ability to Propose Optimal Prosthetic Rehabilitation can be Improved by Discussion between the Dentist and Radiation Oncologist Regarding Upstream Dosimetry
title_short Ability to Propose Optimal Prosthetic Rehabilitation can be Improved by Discussion between the Dentist and Radiation Oncologist Regarding Upstream Dosimetry
title_sort ability to propose optimal prosthetic rehabilitation can be improved by discussion between the dentist and radiation oncologist regarding upstream dosimetry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6635961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31170766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1688523
work_keys_str_mv AT rouersmelanie abilitytoproposeoptimalprostheticrehabilitationcanbeimprovedbydiscussionbetweenthedentistandradiationoncologistregardingupstreamdosimetry
AT bornertfabien abilitytoproposeoptimalprostheticrehabilitationcanbeimprovedbydiscussionbetweenthedentistandradiationoncologistregardingupstreamdosimetry
AT truntzerpierre abilitytoproposeoptimalprostheticrehabilitationcanbeimprovedbydiscussionbetweenthedentistandradiationoncologistregardingupstreamdosimetry
AT dubourgsarah abilitytoproposeoptimalprostheticrehabilitationcanbeimprovedbydiscussionbetweenthedentistandradiationoncologistregardingupstreamdosimetry
AT bourriercyrielle abilitytoproposeoptimalprostheticrehabilitationcanbeimprovedbydiscussionbetweenthedentistandradiationoncologistregardingupstreamdosimetry
AT antonidelphine abilitytoproposeoptimalprostheticrehabilitationcanbeimprovedbydiscussionbetweenthedentistandradiationoncologistregardingupstreamdosimetry
AT noelgeorges abilitytoproposeoptimalprostheticrehabilitationcanbeimprovedbydiscussionbetweenthedentistandradiationoncologistregardingupstreamdosimetry