Cargando…

Does Implant-Abutment Interface affect Marginal Bone Levels around Implants?

Objective The use of dental implants with different types of surface roughness and implant-abutment interface has brought about a situation of marginal bone loss. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze and compare marginal bone levels of different types of osseointegrated dental implants wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elemek, Eser, Urgancioglu, Artun, Dincer, Janberd, Cilingir, Altug
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6635972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31170755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1688538
_version_ 1783435978183016448
author Elemek, Eser
Urgancioglu, Artun
Dincer, Janberd
Cilingir, Altug
author_facet Elemek, Eser
Urgancioglu, Artun
Dincer, Janberd
Cilingir, Altug
author_sort Elemek, Eser
collection PubMed
description Objective The use of dental implants with different types of surface roughness and implant-abutment interface has brought about a situation of marginal bone loss. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze and compare marginal bone levels of different types of osseointegrated dental implants with platform switch (Group A: Ankylos, Mannheim, Germany) and platform match (Group B: Dentsply Xive, Mannheim, Germany, and Group C: MIS Implant Technologies, Karmiel, Israel). Materials and Methods One hundred and seven patients (52 men and 55 women) with a mean age of 54.79 (standard deviation ± 12.35) years and a total of 321 dental implants (Group A, n = 198; Group B, n = 58; and Group C, n = 65) placed in a private practice between April 2006 and May 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. In addition to demographic information and implant characteristics, marginal bone levels were evaluated by Image J (Wayne Rasband, National Institute of Health, Maryland) program. Results The mean age of all patients was 54.79 ± 12.35 years, and 51.5% of them were women. Implants supporting fixed bridge were most commonly used in all groups (65%), whereas only 20% were restored with a single crown and 15% with overdentures. In total, 47.5% of all implants showed no marginal bone loss. Mean bone loss in Group A was significantly lower (0.81 ± 1.60 mm) as compared to Group B (1.58 ± 1.59 mm) and Group C (1.18 ± 1.36) ( p < 0.005). Conclusion Among different types of dental implants, platform switch seems to preserve marginal bone levels and increase the long-term success of dental implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6635972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66359722019-07-18 Does Implant-Abutment Interface affect Marginal Bone Levels around Implants? Elemek, Eser Urgancioglu, Artun Dincer, Janberd Cilingir, Altug Eur J Dent Objective The use of dental implants with different types of surface roughness and implant-abutment interface has brought about a situation of marginal bone loss. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze and compare marginal bone levels of different types of osseointegrated dental implants with platform switch (Group A: Ankylos, Mannheim, Germany) and platform match (Group B: Dentsply Xive, Mannheim, Germany, and Group C: MIS Implant Technologies, Karmiel, Israel). Materials and Methods One hundred and seven patients (52 men and 55 women) with a mean age of 54.79 (standard deviation ± 12.35) years and a total of 321 dental implants (Group A, n = 198; Group B, n = 58; and Group C, n = 65) placed in a private practice between April 2006 and May 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. In addition to demographic information and implant characteristics, marginal bone levels were evaluated by Image J (Wayne Rasband, National Institute of Health, Maryland) program. Results The mean age of all patients was 54.79 ± 12.35 years, and 51.5% of them were women. Implants supporting fixed bridge were most commonly used in all groups (65%), whereas only 20% were restored with a single crown and 15% with overdentures. In total, 47.5% of all implants showed no marginal bone loss. Mean bone loss in Group A was significantly lower (0.81 ± 1.60 mm) as compared to Group B (1.58 ± 1.59 mm) and Group C (1.18 ± 1.36) ( p < 0.005). Conclusion Among different types of dental implants, platform switch seems to preserve marginal bone levels and increase the long-term success of dental implants. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. 2019-02 2019-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6635972/ /pubmed/31170755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1688538 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Elemek, Eser
Urgancioglu, Artun
Dincer, Janberd
Cilingir, Altug
Does Implant-Abutment Interface affect Marginal Bone Levels around Implants?
title Does Implant-Abutment Interface affect Marginal Bone Levels around Implants?
title_full Does Implant-Abutment Interface affect Marginal Bone Levels around Implants?
title_fullStr Does Implant-Abutment Interface affect Marginal Bone Levels around Implants?
title_full_unstemmed Does Implant-Abutment Interface affect Marginal Bone Levels around Implants?
title_short Does Implant-Abutment Interface affect Marginal Bone Levels around Implants?
title_sort does implant-abutment interface affect marginal bone levels around implants?
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6635972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31170755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1688538
work_keys_str_mv AT elemekeser doesimplantabutmentinterfaceaffectmarginalbonelevelsaroundimplants
AT urganciogluartun doesimplantabutmentinterfaceaffectmarginalbonelevelsaroundimplants
AT dincerjanberd doesimplantabutmentinterfaceaffectmarginalbonelevelsaroundimplants
AT cilingiraltug doesimplantabutmentinterfaceaffectmarginalbonelevelsaroundimplants