Cargando…

Can targeted cover letters improve participation in health surveys? Results from a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Improving response rates in epidemiologic studies is important for the generalizability of the outcome. The aim of this study was to examine whether it can be advantageous for participation to target different versions of the cover letters to different sample subgroups. METHODS: A random...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christensen, Anne Illemann, Lynn, Peter, Tolstrup, Janne Schurmann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6635988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31315577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0799-4
_version_ 1783435981018365952
author Christensen, Anne Illemann
Lynn, Peter
Tolstrup, Janne Schurmann
author_facet Christensen, Anne Illemann
Lynn, Peter
Tolstrup, Janne Schurmann
author_sort Christensen, Anne Illemann
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Improving response rates in epidemiologic studies is important for the generalizability of the outcome. The aim of this study was to examine whether it can be advantageous for participation to target different versions of the cover letters to different sample subgroups. METHODS: A randomized trial was incorporated in a cross-sectional health survey in Denmark (n = 25,000) where a motivational sentence in the cover letter intended to heighten perceptions of relevance of the survey was varied among 11 sample subgroups (treatment groups). Ten different versions of a sentence outlining questionnaire themes were tested: each mentioned three out of five themes: stress, alcohol, sex, sleep problems, and contact with family and friends. An eleventh group, the control group, omitted this sentence. RESULTS: On average, the additional motivational sentence resulted in a significantly lower response rate overall compared to the control group. However, the additional motivational sentence was found to have heterogeneous effects on survey response. Furthermore, the nature of the heterogeneity differed between the versions of the sentence. Specifically, the additional sentence tended to produce a higher response rate among the youngest age group and a lower response rate in the oldest age group compared to the generic letter. The use of alcohol in the motivational sentence tended to have a positive effect on response in the age group 16–24 years, and stress tended to have a positive effect in the age group ≥65 years. On the contrary, sex tended to have a negative effect in the age groups 45–64 years and ≥ 65 years. However, a significant interaction was only found between the use of stress and age group (p = < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The findings of significant and heterogeneous effects suggest that there is potential for a targeted approach to improve both response rates and sample composition. The uneven effect of the separate themes across age groups suggests that the selection of themes to be included in the motivational sentence is important for the use of targeted appeals to be successful and warrants further research to better identify which themes works in which contexts, in which subgroups and under which circumstances. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03046368, retrospectively registered February 8th, 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-019-0799-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6635988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66359882019-07-25 Can targeted cover letters improve participation in health surveys? Results from a randomized controlled trial Christensen, Anne Illemann Lynn, Peter Tolstrup, Janne Schurmann BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Improving response rates in epidemiologic studies is important for the generalizability of the outcome. The aim of this study was to examine whether it can be advantageous for participation to target different versions of the cover letters to different sample subgroups. METHODS: A randomized trial was incorporated in a cross-sectional health survey in Denmark (n = 25,000) where a motivational sentence in the cover letter intended to heighten perceptions of relevance of the survey was varied among 11 sample subgroups (treatment groups). Ten different versions of a sentence outlining questionnaire themes were tested: each mentioned three out of five themes: stress, alcohol, sex, sleep problems, and contact with family and friends. An eleventh group, the control group, omitted this sentence. RESULTS: On average, the additional motivational sentence resulted in a significantly lower response rate overall compared to the control group. However, the additional motivational sentence was found to have heterogeneous effects on survey response. Furthermore, the nature of the heterogeneity differed between the versions of the sentence. Specifically, the additional sentence tended to produce a higher response rate among the youngest age group and a lower response rate in the oldest age group compared to the generic letter. The use of alcohol in the motivational sentence tended to have a positive effect on response in the age group 16–24 years, and stress tended to have a positive effect in the age group ≥65 years. On the contrary, sex tended to have a negative effect in the age groups 45–64 years and ≥ 65 years. However, a significant interaction was only found between the use of stress and age group (p = < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The findings of significant and heterogeneous effects suggest that there is potential for a targeted approach to improve both response rates and sample composition. The uneven effect of the separate themes across age groups suggests that the selection of themes to be included in the motivational sentence is important for the use of targeted appeals to be successful and warrants further research to better identify which themes works in which contexts, in which subgroups and under which circumstances. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03046368, retrospectively registered February 8th, 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-019-0799-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6635988/ /pubmed/31315577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0799-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Christensen, Anne Illemann
Lynn, Peter
Tolstrup, Janne Schurmann
Can targeted cover letters improve participation in health surveys? Results from a randomized controlled trial
title Can targeted cover letters improve participation in health surveys? Results from a randomized controlled trial
title_full Can targeted cover letters improve participation in health surveys? Results from a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Can targeted cover letters improve participation in health surveys? Results from a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Can targeted cover letters improve participation in health surveys? Results from a randomized controlled trial
title_short Can targeted cover letters improve participation in health surveys? Results from a randomized controlled trial
title_sort can targeted cover letters improve participation in health surveys? results from a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6635988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31315577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0799-4
work_keys_str_mv AT christensenanneillemann cantargetedcoverlettersimproveparticipationinhealthsurveysresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lynnpeter cantargetedcoverlettersimproveparticipationinhealthsurveysresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tolstrupjanneschurmann cantargetedcoverlettersimproveparticipationinhealthsurveysresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial