Cargando…

Genotyping-by-sequencing and SNP-arrays are complementary for detecting quantitative trait loci by tagging different haplotypes in association studies

BACKGROUND: Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) array and re-sequencing technologies have different properties (e.g. calling rate, minor allele frequency profile) and drawbacks (e.g. ascertainment bias). This lead us to study their complementarity and the consequences of using them separately or co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Negro, Sandra S., Millet, Emilie J., Madur, Delphine, Bauland, Cyril, Combes, Valérie, Welcker, Claude, Tardieu, François, Charcosset, Alain, Nicolas, Stéphane D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6636005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31311506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-1926-4
_version_ 1783435985063772160
author Negro, Sandra S.
Millet, Emilie J.
Madur, Delphine
Bauland, Cyril
Combes, Valérie
Welcker, Claude
Tardieu, François
Charcosset, Alain
Nicolas, Stéphane D.
author_facet Negro, Sandra S.
Millet, Emilie J.
Madur, Delphine
Bauland, Cyril
Combes, Valérie
Welcker, Claude
Tardieu, François
Charcosset, Alain
Nicolas, Stéphane D.
author_sort Negro, Sandra S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) array and re-sequencing technologies have different properties (e.g. calling rate, minor allele frequency profile) and drawbacks (e.g. ascertainment bias). This lead us to study their complementarity and the consequences of using them separately or combined in diversity analyses and Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS). We performed GWAS on three traits (grain yield, plant height and male flowering time) measured in 22 environments on a panel of 247 F1 hybrids obtained by crossing 247 diverse dent maize inbred lines with a same flint line. The 247 lines were genotyped using three genotyping technologies (Genotyping-By-Sequencing, Illumina Infinium 50 K and Affymetrix Axiom 600 K arrays). RESULTS: The effects of ascertainment bias of the 50 K and 600 K arrays were negligible for deciphering global genetic trends of diversity and for estimating relatedness in this panel. We developed an original approach based on linkage disequilibrium (LD) extent in order to determine whether SNPs significantly associated with a trait and that are physically linked should be considered as a single Quantitative Trait Locus (QTL) or several independent QTLs. Using this approach, we showed that the combination of the three technologies, which have different SNP distributions and densities, allowed us to detect more QTLs (gain in power) and potentially refine the localization of the causal polymorphisms (gain in resolution). CONCLUSIONS: Conceptually different technologies are complementary for detecting QTLs by tagging different haplotypes in association studies. Considering LD, marker density and the combination of different technologies (SNP-arrays and re-sequencing), the genotypic data available were most likely enough to well represent polymorphisms in the centromeric regions, whereas using more markers would be beneficial for telomeric regions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12870-019-1926-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6636005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66360052019-07-25 Genotyping-by-sequencing and SNP-arrays are complementary for detecting quantitative trait loci by tagging different haplotypes in association studies Negro, Sandra S. Millet, Emilie J. Madur, Delphine Bauland, Cyril Combes, Valérie Welcker, Claude Tardieu, François Charcosset, Alain Nicolas, Stéphane D. BMC Plant Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) array and re-sequencing technologies have different properties (e.g. calling rate, minor allele frequency profile) and drawbacks (e.g. ascertainment bias). This lead us to study their complementarity and the consequences of using them separately or combined in diversity analyses and Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS). We performed GWAS on three traits (grain yield, plant height and male flowering time) measured in 22 environments on a panel of 247 F1 hybrids obtained by crossing 247 diverse dent maize inbred lines with a same flint line. The 247 lines were genotyped using three genotyping technologies (Genotyping-By-Sequencing, Illumina Infinium 50 K and Affymetrix Axiom 600 K arrays). RESULTS: The effects of ascertainment bias of the 50 K and 600 K arrays were negligible for deciphering global genetic trends of diversity and for estimating relatedness in this panel. We developed an original approach based on linkage disequilibrium (LD) extent in order to determine whether SNPs significantly associated with a trait and that are physically linked should be considered as a single Quantitative Trait Locus (QTL) or several independent QTLs. Using this approach, we showed that the combination of the three technologies, which have different SNP distributions and densities, allowed us to detect more QTLs (gain in power) and potentially refine the localization of the causal polymorphisms (gain in resolution). CONCLUSIONS: Conceptually different technologies are complementary for detecting QTLs by tagging different haplotypes in association studies. Considering LD, marker density and the combination of different technologies (SNP-arrays and re-sequencing), the genotypic data available were most likely enough to well represent polymorphisms in the centromeric regions, whereas using more markers would be beneficial for telomeric regions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12870-019-1926-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6636005/ /pubmed/31311506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-1926-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Negro, Sandra S.
Millet, Emilie J.
Madur, Delphine
Bauland, Cyril
Combes, Valérie
Welcker, Claude
Tardieu, François
Charcosset, Alain
Nicolas, Stéphane D.
Genotyping-by-sequencing and SNP-arrays are complementary for detecting quantitative trait loci by tagging different haplotypes in association studies
title Genotyping-by-sequencing and SNP-arrays are complementary for detecting quantitative trait loci by tagging different haplotypes in association studies
title_full Genotyping-by-sequencing and SNP-arrays are complementary for detecting quantitative trait loci by tagging different haplotypes in association studies
title_fullStr Genotyping-by-sequencing and SNP-arrays are complementary for detecting quantitative trait loci by tagging different haplotypes in association studies
title_full_unstemmed Genotyping-by-sequencing and SNP-arrays are complementary for detecting quantitative trait loci by tagging different haplotypes in association studies
title_short Genotyping-by-sequencing and SNP-arrays are complementary for detecting quantitative trait loci by tagging different haplotypes in association studies
title_sort genotyping-by-sequencing and snp-arrays are complementary for detecting quantitative trait loci by tagging different haplotypes in association studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6636005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31311506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-1926-4
work_keys_str_mv AT negrosandras genotypingbysequencingandsnparraysarecomplementaryfordetectingquantitativetraitlocibytaggingdifferenthaplotypesinassociationstudies
AT milletemiliej genotypingbysequencingandsnparraysarecomplementaryfordetectingquantitativetraitlocibytaggingdifferenthaplotypesinassociationstudies
AT madurdelphine genotypingbysequencingandsnparraysarecomplementaryfordetectingquantitativetraitlocibytaggingdifferenthaplotypesinassociationstudies
AT baulandcyril genotypingbysequencingandsnparraysarecomplementaryfordetectingquantitativetraitlocibytaggingdifferenthaplotypesinassociationstudies
AT combesvalerie genotypingbysequencingandsnparraysarecomplementaryfordetectingquantitativetraitlocibytaggingdifferenthaplotypesinassociationstudies
AT welckerclaude genotypingbysequencingandsnparraysarecomplementaryfordetectingquantitativetraitlocibytaggingdifferenthaplotypesinassociationstudies
AT tardieufrancois genotypingbysequencingandsnparraysarecomplementaryfordetectingquantitativetraitlocibytaggingdifferenthaplotypesinassociationstudies
AT charcossetalain genotypingbysequencingandsnparraysarecomplementaryfordetectingquantitativetraitlocibytaggingdifferenthaplotypesinassociationstudies
AT nicolasstephaned genotypingbysequencingandsnparraysarecomplementaryfordetectingquantitativetraitlocibytaggingdifferenthaplotypesinassociationstudies