Cargando…

Somatic variants of potential clinical significance in the tumors of BRCA phenocopies

BACKGROUND: BRCA phenocopies are individuals with the same phenotype (i.e. cancer consistent with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome = HBOC) as their affected relatives, but not the same genotype as assessed by blood germline testing (i.e. they do not carry a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buckingham, Lela, Mitchell, Rachel, Maienschein-Cline, Mark, Green, Stefan, Hu, Vincent Hong, Cobleigh, Melody, Rotmensch, Jacob, Burgess, Kelly, Usha, Lydia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6636136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31346352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13053-019-0117-5
_version_ 1783436012075089920
author Buckingham, Lela
Mitchell, Rachel
Maienschein-Cline, Mark
Green, Stefan
Hu, Vincent Hong
Cobleigh, Melody
Rotmensch, Jacob
Burgess, Kelly
Usha, Lydia
author_facet Buckingham, Lela
Mitchell, Rachel
Maienschein-Cline, Mark
Green, Stefan
Hu, Vincent Hong
Cobleigh, Melody
Rotmensch, Jacob
Burgess, Kelly
Usha, Lydia
author_sort Buckingham, Lela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: BRCA phenocopies are individuals with the same phenotype (i.e. cancer consistent with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome = HBOC) as their affected relatives, but not the same genotype as assessed by blood germline testing (i.e. they do not carry a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation). There is some evidence of increased risk for HBOC-related cancers in relatives of germline variant carriers even though they themselves test negative for the familial variant (BRCA non-carriers). At this time, BRCA phenocopies are recommended to undergo the same cancer surveillance as individuals in the general population. This raises the question of whether the increased cancer risk in BRCA non-carriers is due to alterations (germline, somatic or epigenetic) in other cancer-associated genes which were not analyzed during BRCA analysis. METHODS: To assess the nature and potential clinical significance of somatic variants in BRCA phenocopy tumors, DNA from BRCA non-carrier tumor tissue was analyzed using next generation sequencing of 572 cancer genes. Tumor diagnoses of the 11 subjects included breast, ovarian, endometrial and primary peritoneal carcinoma. Variants were called using FreeBayes genetic variant detector. Variants were annotated for effect on protein sequence, predicted function, and frequency in different populations from the 1000 genomes project, and presence in variant databases COSMIC and ClinVar using Annovar. RESULTS: None of the familial BRCA1/2 mutations were found in the tumor samples tested. The most frequently occurring somatic gene variants were ROS1(6/11 cases) and NUP98 (5/11 cases). BRCA2 somatic variants were found in 2/6 BRCA1 phenocopies, but 0/5 BRCA2 phenocopies. Variants of uncertain significance were found in other DNA repair genes (ERCC1, ERCC3, ERCC4, FANCD2, PALB2), one mismatch repair gene (PMS2), a DNA demethylation enzyme (TET2), and two histone modifiers (EZH2, SUZ12). CONCLUSIONS: Although limited by a small sample size, these results support a role of selected somatic variants and epigenetic mechanisms in the development of tumors in BRCA phenocopies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6636136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66361362019-07-25 Somatic variants of potential clinical significance in the tumors of BRCA phenocopies Buckingham, Lela Mitchell, Rachel Maienschein-Cline, Mark Green, Stefan Hu, Vincent Hong Cobleigh, Melody Rotmensch, Jacob Burgess, Kelly Usha, Lydia Hered Cancer Clin Pract Research BACKGROUND: BRCA phenocopies are individuals with the same phenotype (i.e. cancer consistent with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome = HBOC) as their affected relatives, but not the same genotype as assessed by blood germline testing (i.e. they do not carry a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation). There is some evidence of increased risk for HBOC-related cancers in relatives of germline variant carriers even though they themselves test negative for the familial variant (BRCA non-carriers). At this time, BRCA phenocopies are recommended to undergo the same cancer surveillance as individuals in the general population. This raises the question of whether the increased cancer risk in BRCA non-carriers is due to alterations (germline, somatic or epigenetic) in other cancer-associated genes which were not analyzed during BRCA analysis. METHODS: To assess the nature and potential clinical significance of somatic variants in BRCA phenocopy tumors, DNA from BRCA non-carrier tumor tissue was analyzed using next generation sequencing of 572 cancer genes. Tumor diagnoses of the 11 subjects included breast, ovarian, endometrial and primary peritoneal carcinoma. Variants were called using FreeBayes genetic variant detector. Variants were annotated for effect on protein sequence, predicted function, and frequency in different populations from the 1000 genomes project, and presence in variant databases COSMIC and ClinVar using Annovar. RESULTS: None of the familial BRCA1/2 mutations were found in the tumor samples tested. The most frequently occurring somatic gene variants were ROS1(6/11 cases) and NUP98 (5/11 cases). BRCA2 somatic variants were found in 2/6 BRCA1 phenocopies, but 0/5 BRCA2 phenocopies. Variants of uncertain significance were found in other DNA repair genes (ERCC1, ERCC3, ERCC4, FANCD2, PALB2), one mismatch repair gene (PMS2), a DNA demethylation enzyme (TET2), and two histone modifiers (EZH2, SUZ12). CONCLUSIONS: Although limited by a small sample size, these results support a role of selected somatic variants and epigenetic mechanisms in the development of tumors in BRCA phenocopies. BioMed Central 2019-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6636136/ /pubmed/31346352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13053-019-0117-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Buckingham, Lela
Mitchell, Rachel
Maienschein-Cline, Mark
Green, Stefan
Hu, Vincent Hong
Cobleigh, Melody
Rotmensch, Jacob
Burgess, Kelly
Usha, Lydia
Somatic variants of potential clinical significance in the tumors of BRCA phenocopies
title Somatic variants of potential clinical significance in the tumors of BRCA phenocopies
title_full Somatic variants of potential clinical significance in the tumors of BRCA phenocopies
title_fullStr Somatic variants of potential clinical significance in the tumors of BRCA phenocopies
title_full_unstemmed Somatic variants of potential clinical significance in the tumors of BRCA phenocopies
title_short Somatic variants of potential clinical significance in the tumors of BRCA phenocopies
title_sort somatic variants of potential clinical significance in the tumors of brca phenocopies
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6636136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31346352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13053-019-0117-5
work_keys_str_mv AT buckinghamlela somaticvariantsofpotentialclinicalsignificanceinthetumorsofbrcaphenocopies
AT mitchellrachel somaticvariantsofpotentialclinicalsignificanceinthetumorsofbrcaphenocopies
AT maienscheinclinemark somaticvariantsofpotentialclinicalsignificanceinthetumorsofbrcaphenocopies
AT greenstefan somaticvariantsofpotentialclinicalsignificanceinthetumorsofbrcaphenocopies
AT huvincenthong somaticvariantsofpotentialclinicalsignificanceinthetumorsofbrcaphenocopies
AT cobleighmelody somaticvariantsofpotentialclinicalsignificanceinthetumorsofbrcaphenocopies
AT rotmenschjacob somaticvariantsofpotentialclinicalsignificanceinthetumorsofbrcaphenocopies
AT burgesskelly somaticvariantsofpotentialclinicalsignificanceinthetumorsofbrcaphenocopies
AT ushalydia somaticvariantsofpotentialclinicalsignificanceinthetumorsofbrcaphenocopies