Cargando…
The difference in prognosis of stage II and III colorectal cancer based on preoperative serum tumor markers
Background: Preoperative serum tumor markers have been widely used to predict prognosis in stage II and III colorectal cancer (CRC). However, few previous studies addressed the effect of increased preoperative numbers of tumor markers. Methods: Patients with stage II and III CRC who underwent curati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6636282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31333793 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.31660 |
_version_ | 1783436035751936000 |
---|---|
author | You, Weiqiang Sheng, Nengquan Yan, Li Chen, Hongqi Gong, Jianfeng He, Zhenghui Zheng, Kaiwen Chen, Zhaohuan Wang, Yafang Tan, Gewen Xie, Lu Wang, Zhigang |
author_facet | You, Weiqiang Sheng, Nengquan Yan, Li Chen, Hongqi Gong, Jianfeng He, Zhenghui Zheng, Kaiwen Chen, Zhaohuan Wang, Yafang Tan, Gewen Xie, Lu Wang, Zhigang |
author_sort | You, Weiqiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Preoperative serum tumor markers have been widely used to predict prognosis in stage II and III colorectal cancer (CRC). However, few previous studies addressed the effect of increased preoperative numbers of tumor markers. Methods: Patients with stage II and III CRC who underwent curative resection were included from January 2009 to October 2015. The relationship between serum tumor markers and clinicopathological parameters was analyzed. DFS and OS were compared in stage II and III CRC. Results: The median follow-up was 45 months. In this study, 735 enrolled patients were assessed based on the numbers of increased tumor markers. We found that these increased tumor markers were closely associated with clinical stage, T stage, N stage, tumor location, pathology type, differentiation, lymphatic invasion and vascular invasion (all p values < 0.05). Furthermore, the number of increased tumor markers directly affected the survival of patients with CRC after curative surgery. The 3-year DFS and OS of patients with a score of 0 were 84.0% and 91.0%, respectively, which are much higher than those of patients with a score of 4 (42.9% and 37.8%, respectively) (p < 0.05). The 5-year DFS and OS of patients with a score of 0 were 75.9% and 77.9%, respectively, which are much higher than those of patients with a score of 4 (31.7% and 23.6%, respectively). Interestingly, our results suggested that stage III CRC patients with a score of 0 had longer DFS and OS times than stage II patients with scores of 3 and 4. Further analysis revealed statistically significant differences in OS (p < 0.05) but not in DFS. Conclusions: The number of increased tumor markers could significantly predict prognosis in stage II and III CRC. In addition, these increased tumor markers had direct impacts on metastasis as well as the recurrence status and survival time of stage II and III CRC patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6636282 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Ivyspring International Publisher |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66362822019-07-22 The difference in prognosis of stage II and III colorectal cancer based on preoperative serum tumor markers You, Weiqiang Sheng, Nengquan Yan, Li Chen, Hongqi Gong, Jianfeng He, Zhenghui Zheng, Kaiwen Chen, Zhaohuan Wang, Yafang Tan, Gewen Xie, Lu Wang, Zhigang J Cancer Research Paper Background: Preoperative serum tumor markers have been widely used to predict prognosis in stage II and III colorectal cancer (CRC). However, few previous studies addressed the effect of increased preoperative numbers of tumor markers. Methods: Patients with stage II and III CRC who underwent curative resection were included from January 2009 to October 2015. The relationship between serum tumor markers and clinicopathological parameters was analyzed. DFS and OS were compared in stage II and III CRC. Results: The median follow-up was 45 months. In this study, 735 enrolled patients were assessed based on the numbers of increased tumor markers. We found that these increased tumor markers were closely associated with clinical stage, T stage, N stage, tumor location, pathology type, differentiation, lymphatic invasion and vascular invasion (all p values < 0.05). Furthermore, the number of increased tumor markers directly affected the survival of patients with CRC after curative surgery. The 3-year DFS and OS of patients with a score of 0 were 84.0% and 91.0%, respectively, which are much higher than those of patients with a score of 4 (42.9% and 37.8%, respectively) (p < 0.05). The 5-year DFS and OS of patients with a score of 0 were 75.9% and 77.9%, respectively, which are much higher than those of patients with a score of 4 (31.7% and 23.6%, respectively). Interestingly, our results suggested that stage III CRC patients with a score of 0 had longer DFS and OS times than stage II patients with scores of 3 and 4. Further analysis revealed statistically significant differences in OS (p < 0.05) but not in DFS. Conclusions: The number of increased tumor markers could significantly predict prognosis in stage II and III CRC. In addition, these increased tumor markers had direct impacts on metastasis as well as the recurrence status and survival time of stage II and III CRC patients. Ivyspring International Publisher 2019-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6636282/ /pubmed/31333793 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.31660 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper You, Weiqiang Sheng, Nengquan Yan, Li Chen, Hongqi Gong, Jianfeng He, Zhenghui Zheng, Kaiwen Chen, Zhaohuan Wang, Yafang Tan, Gewen Xie, Lu Wang, Zhigang The difference in prognosis of stage II and III colorectal cancer based on preoperative serum tumor markers |
title | The difference in prognosis of stage II and III colorectal cancer based on preoperative serum tumor markers |
title_full | The difference in prognosis of stage II and III colorectal cancer based on preoperative serum tumor markers |
title_fullStr | The difference in prognosis of stage II and III colorectal cancer based on preoperative serum tumor markers |
title_full_unstemmed | The difference in prognosis of stage II and III colorectal cancer based on preoperative serum tumor markers |
title_short | The difference in prognosis of stage II and III colorectal cancer based on preoperative serum tumor markers |
title_sort | difference in prognosis of stage ii and iii colorectal cancer based on preoperative serum tumor markers |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6636282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31333793 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.31660 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT youweiqiang thedifferenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers AT shengnengquan thedifferenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers AT yanli thedifferenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers AT chenhongqi thedifferenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers AT gongjianfeng thedifferenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers AT hezhenghui thedifferenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers AT zhengkaiwen thedifferenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers AT chenzhaohuan thedifferenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers AT wangyafang thedifferenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers AT tangewen thedifferenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers AT xielu thedifferenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers AT wangzhigang thedifferenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers AT youweiqiang differenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers AT shengnengquan differenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers AT yanli differenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers AT chenhongqi differenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers AT gongjianfeng differenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers AT hezhenghui differenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers AT zhengkaiwen differenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers AT chenzhaohuan differenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers AT wangyafang differenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers AT tangewen differenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers AT xielu differenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers AT wangzhigang differenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers |