Cargando…

The difference in prognosis of stage II and III colorectal cancer based on preoperative serum tumor markers

Background: Preoperative serum tumor markers have been widely used to predict prognosis in stage II and III colorectal cancer (CRC). However, few previous studies addressed the effect of increased preoperative numbers of tumor markers. Methods: Patients with stage II and III CRC who underwent curati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: You, Weiqiang, Sheng, Nengquan, Yan, Li, Chen, Hongqi, Gong, Jianfeng, He, Zhenghui, Zheng, Kaiwen, Chen, Zhaohuan, Wang, Yafang, Tan, Gewen, Xie, Lu, Wang, Zhigang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6636282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31333793
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.31660
_version_ 1783436035751936000
author You, Weiqiang
Sheng, Nengquan
Yan, Li
Chen, Hongqi
Gong, Jianfeng
He, Zhenghui
Zheng, Kaiwen
Chen, Zhaohuan
Wang, Yafang
Tan, Gewen
Xie, Lu
Wang, Zhigang
author_facet You, Weiqiang
Sheng, Nengquan
Yan, Li
Chen, Hongqi
Gong, Jianfeng
He, Zhenghui
Zheng, Kaiwen
Chen, Zhaohuan
Wang, Yafang
Tan, Gewen
Xie, Lu
Wang, Zhigang
author_sort You, Weiqiang
collection PubMed
description Background: Preoperative serum tumor markers have been widely used to predict prognosis in stage II and III colorectal cancer (CRC). However, few previous studies addressed the effect of increased preoperative numbers of tumor markers. Methods: Patients with stage II and III CRC who underwent curative resection were included from January 2009 to October 2015. The relationship between serum tumor markers and clinicopathological parameters was analyzed. DFS and OS were compared in stage II and III CRC. Results: The median follow-up was 45 months. In this study, 735 enrolled patients were assessed based on the numbers of increased tumor markers. We found that these increased tumor markers were closely associated with clinical stage, T stage, N stage, tumor location, pathology type, differentiation, lymphatic invasion and vascular invasion (all p values < 0.05). Furthermore, the number of increased tumor markers directly affected the survival of patients with CRC after curative surgery. The 3-year DFS and OS of patients with a score of 0 were 84.0% and 91.0%, respectively, which are much higher than those of patients with a score of 4 (42.9% and 37.8%, respectively) (p < 0.05). The 5-year DFS and OS of patients with a score of 0 were 75.9% and 77.9%, respectively, which are much higher than those of patients with a score of 4 (31.7% and 23.6%, respectively). Interestingly, our results suggested that stage III CRC patients with a score of 0 had longer DFS and OS times than stage II patients with scores of 3 and 4. Further analysis revealed statistically significant differences in OS (p < 0.05) but not in DFS. Conclusions: The number of increased tumor markers could significantly predict prognosis in stage II and III CRC. In addition, these increased tumor markers had direct impacts on metastasis as well as the recurrence status and survival time of stage II and III CRC patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6636282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66362822019-07-22 The difference in prognosis of stage II and III colorectal cancer based on preoperative serum tumor markers You, Weiqiang Sheng, Nengquan Yan, Li Chen, Hongqi Gong, Jianfeng He, Zhenghui Zheng, Kaiwen Chen, Zhaohuan Wang, Yafang Tan, Gewen Xie, Lu Wang, Zhigang J Cancer Research Paper Background: Preoperative serum tumor markers have been widely used to predict prognosis in stage II and III colorectal cancer (CRC). However, few previous studies addressed the effect of increased preoperative numbers of tumor markers. Methods: Patients with stage II and III CRC who underwent curative resection were included from January 2009 to October 2015. The relationship between serum tumor markers and clinicopathological parameters was analyzed. DFS and OS were compared in stage II and III CRC. Results: The median follow-up was 45 months. In this study, 735 enrolled patients were assessed based on the numbers of increased tumor markers. We found that these increased tumor markers were closely associated with clinical stage, T stage, N stage, tumor location, pathology type, differentiation, lymphatic invasion and vascular invasion (all p values < 0.05). Furthermore, the number of increased tumor markers directly affected the survival of patients with CRC after curative surgery. The 3-year DFS and OS of patients with a score of 0 were 84.0% and 91.0%, respectively, which are much higher than those of patients with a score of 4 (42.9% and 37.8%, respectively) (p < 0.05). The 5-year DFS and OS of patients with a score of 0 were 75.9% and 77.9%, respectively, which are much higher than those of patients with a score of 4 (31.7% and 23.6%, respectively). Interestingly, our results suggested that stage III CRC patients with a score of 0 had longer DFS and OS times than stage II patients with scores of 3 and 4. Further analysis revealed statistically significant differences in OS (p < 0.05) but not in DFS. Conclusions: The number of increased tumor markers could significantly predict prognosis in stage II and III CRC. In addition, these increased tumor markers had direct impacts on metastasis as well as the recurrence status and survival time of stage II and III CRC patients. Ivyspring International Publisher 2019-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6636282/ /pubmed/31333793 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.31660 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
You, Weiqiang
Sheng, Nengquan
Yan, Li
Chen, Hongqi
Gong, Jianfeng
He, Zhenghui
Zheng, Kaiwen
Chen, Zhaohuan
Wang, Yafang
Tan, Gewen
Xie, Lu
Wang, Zhigang
The difference in prognosis of stage II and III colorectal cancer based on preoperative serum tumor markers
title The difference in prognosis of stage II and III colorectal cancer based on preoperative serum tumor markers
title_full The difference in prognosis of stage II and III colorectal cancer based on preoperative serum tumor markers
title_fullStr The difference in prognosis of stage II and III colorectal cancer based on preoperative serum tumor markers
title_full_unstemmed The difference in prognosis of stage II and III colorectal cancer based on preoperative serum tumor markers
title_short The difference in prognosis of stage II and III colorectal cancer based on preoperative serum tumor markers
title_sort difference in prognosis of stage ii and iii colorectal cancer based on preoperative serum tumor markers
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6636282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31333793
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.31660
work_keys_str_mv AT youweiqiang thedifferenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers
AT shengnengquan thedifferenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers
AT yanli thedifferenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers
AT chenhongqi thedifferenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers
AT gongjianfeng thedifferenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers
AT hezhenghui thedifferenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers
AT zhengkaiwen thedifferenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers
AT chenzhaohuan thedifferenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers
AT wangyafang thedifferenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers
AT tangewen thedifferenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers
AT xielu thedifferenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers
AT wangzhigang thedifferenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers
AT youweiqiang differenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers
AT shengnengquan differenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers
AT yanli differenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers
AT chenhongqi differenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers
AT gongjianfeng differenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers
AT hezhenghui differenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers
AT zhengkaiwen differenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers
AT chenzhaohuan differenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers
AT wangyafang differenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers
AT tangewen differenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers
AT xielu differenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers
AT wangzhigang differenceinprognosisofstageiiandiiicolorectalcancerbasedonpreoperativeserumtumormarkers