Cargando…

The Development and Validation of the LIMPRINT Methodology

The acronym Limprint stands for Lymphedema IMpact and PRevalence INTernational and was run under the auspices of the International Lymphedema Framework (ILF), a charity dedicated to improving provision of care globally. The primary aim was to identify the number of people with chronic edema (chronic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moffatt, Christine, Franks, Peter, Keeley, Vaughan, Murray, Susie, Mercier, Gregoire, Quéré, Isabelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6636670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30995185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2018.0081
_version_ 1783436104796471296
author Moffatt, Christine
Franks, Peter
Keeley, Vaughan
Murray, Susie
Mercier, Gregoire
Quéré, Isabelle
author_facet Moffatt, Christine
Franks, Peter
Keeley, Vaughan
Murray, Susie
Mercier, Gregoire
Quéré, Isabelle
author_sort Moffatt, Christine
collection PubMed
description The acronym Limprint stands for Lymphedema IMpact and PRevalence INTernational and was run under the auspices of the International Lymphedema Framework (ILF), a charity dedicated to improving provision of care globally. The primary aim was to identify the number of people with chronic edema (chronic edema present for >3 months and due to a range of underlying etiologies and associated risk factors) within diverse health services in nine participating countries and to determine its impact using validated methods. An international protocol and sampling framework, online data capture system, and standard operating procedures were adopted. An international consensus was used to create a core data tool that covered 13 domains. Specialist data on demographics and disability, details of swelling, wounds, cancer, and health-related quality of life were also available for sites. The study protocol was designed to allow flexibility in the types of studies undertaken within complex health care systems. All cases were confirmed using the modified pitting test. Sensitivity and specificity for this method were determined in Japanese and European populations. Following confirmation of a chronic edema case, Lymphologists defined whether it was a primary of a secondary form. The study was designed to provide robust evidence that chronic edema is an important and unrecognized public health problem in health services with significant morbidity. Without evidence of the size and complexity, it will remain considered a rare phenomenon and people affected will be denied access to appropriate treatment that would allow them to have fulfilled and productive lives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6636670
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66366702019-07-18 The Development and Validation of the LIMPRINT Methodology Moffatt, Christine Franks, Peter Keeley, Vaughan Murray, Susie Mercier, Gregoire Quéré, Isabelle Lymphat Res Biol Original Articles The acronym Limprint stands for Lymphedema IMpact and PRevalence INTernational and was run under the auspices of the International Lymphedema Framework (ILF), a charity dedicated to improving provision of care globally. The primary aim was to identify the number of people with chronic edema (chronic edema present for >3 months and due to a range of underlying etiologies and associated risk factors) within diverse health services in nine participating countries and to determine its impact using validated methods. An international protocol and sampling framework, online data capture system, and standard operating procedures were adopted. An international consensus was used to create a core data tool that covered 13 domains. Specialist data on demographics and disability, details of swelling, wounds, cancer, and health-related quality of life were also available for sites. The study protocol was designed to allow flexibility in the types of studies undertaken within complex health care systems. All cases were confirmed using the modified pitting test. Sensitivity and specificity for this method were determined in Japanese and European populations. Following confirmation of a chronic edema case, Lymphologists defined whether it was a primary of a secondary form. The study was designed to provide robust evidence that chronic edema is an important and unrecognized public health problem in health services with significant morbidity. Without evidence of the size and complexity, it will remain considered a rare phenomenon and people affected will be denied access to appropriate treatment that would allow them to have fulfilled and productive lives. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2019-04-01 2019-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6636670/ /pubmed/30995185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2018.0081 Text en © Christine Moffatt et al. 2019; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Moffatt, Christine
Franks, Peter
Keeley, Vaughan
Murray, Susie
Mercier, Gregoire
Quéré, Isabelle
The Development and Validation of the LIMPRINT Methodology
title The Development and Validation of the LIMPRINT Methodology
title_full The Development and Validation of the LIMPRINT Methodology
title_fullStr The Development and Validation of the LIMPRINT Methodology
title_full_unstemmed The Development and Validation of the LIMPRINT Methodology
title_short The Development and Validation of the LIMPRINT Methodology
title_sort development and validation of the limprint methodology
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6636670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30995185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2018.0081
work_keys_str_mv AT moffattchristine thedevelopmentandvalidationofthelimprintmethodology
AT frankspeter thedevelopmentandvalidationofthelimprintmethodology
AT keeleyvaughan thedevelopmentandvalidationofthelimprintmethodology
AT murraysusie thedevelopmentandvalidationofthelimprintmethodology
AT merciergregoire thedevelopmentandvalidationofthelimprintmethodology
AT quereisabelle thedevelopmentandvalidationofthelimprintmethodology
AT moffattchristine developmentandvalidationofthelimprintmethodology
AT frankspeter developmentandvalidationofthelimprintmethodology
AT keeleyvaughan developmentandvalidationofthelimprintmethodology
AT murraysusie developmentandvalidationofthelimprintmethodology
AT merciergregoire developmentandvalidationofthelimprintmethodology
AT quereisabelle developmentandvalidationofthelimprintmethodology