Cargando…

Evaluating time-reversed speech and signal-correlated noise as auditory baselines for isolating speech-specific processing using fNIRS

Evidence using well-established imaging techniques, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging and electrocorticography, suggest that speech-specific cortical responses can be functionally localised by contrasting speech responses with an auditory baseline stimulus, such as time-reversed (TR) spe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mushtaq, Faizah, Wiggins, Ian M., Kitterick, Pádraig T., Anderson, Carly A., Hartley, Douglas E. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6636749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31314802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219927
_version_ 1783436118657597440
author Mushtaq, Faizah
Wiggins, Ian M.
Kitterick, Pádraig T.
Anderson, Carly A.
Hartley, Douglas E. H.
author_facet Mushtaq, Faizah
Wiggins, Ian M.
Kitterick, Pádraig T.
Anderson, Carly A.
Hartley, Douglas E. H.
author_sort Mushtaq, Faizah
collection PubMed
description Evidence using well-established imaging techniques, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging and electrocorticography, suggest that speech-specific cortical responses can be functionally localised by contrasting speech responses with an auditory baseline stimulus, such as time-reversed (TR) speech or signal-correlated noise (SCN). Furthermore, these studies suggest that SCN is a more effective baseline than TR speech. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a relatively novel, optically-based imaging technique with features that make it ideal for investigating speech and language function in paediatric populations. However, it is not known which baseline is best at isolating speech activation when imaging using fNIRS. We presented normal speech, TR speech and SCN in an event-related format to 25 normally-hearing children aged 6–12 years. Brain activity was measured across frontal and temporal brain areas in both cerebral hemispheres whilst children passively listened to the auditory stimuli. In all three conditions, significant activation was observed bilaterally in channels targeting superior temporal regions when stimuli were contrasted against silence. Unlike previous findings in infants, we found no significant activation in the region of interest over superior temporal cortex in school-age children when normal speech was contrasted against either TR speech or SCN. Although no statistically significant lateralisation effects were observed in the region of interest, a left-sided channel targeting posterior temporal regions showed significant activity in response to normal speech only, and was investigated further. Significantly greater activation was observed in this left posterior channel compared to the corresponding channel on the right side under the normal speech vs SCN contrast only. Our findings suggest that neither TR speech nor SCN are suitable auditory baselines for functionally isolating speech-specific processing in an experimental set up involving fNIRS with 6–12 year old children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6636749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66367492019-07-25 Evaluating time-reversed speech and signal-correlated noise as auditory baselines for isolating speech-specific processing using fNIRS Mushtaq, Faizah Wiggins, Ian M. Kitterick, Pádraig T. Anderson, Carly A. Hartley, Douglas E. H. PLoS One Research Article Evidence using well-established imaging techniques, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging and electrocorticography, suggest that speech-specific cortical responses can be functionally localised by contrasting speech responses with an auditory baseline stimulus, such as time-reversed (TR) speech or signal-correlated noise (SCN). Furthermore, these studies suggest that SCN is a more effective baseline than TR speech. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a relatively novel, optically-based imaging technique with features that make it ideal for investigating speech and language function in paediatric populations. However, it is not known which baseline is best at isolating speech activation when imaging using fNIRS. We presented normal speech, TR speech and SCN in an event-related format to 25 normally-hearing children aged 6–12 years. Brain activity was measured across frontal and temporal brain areas in both cerebral hemispheres whilst children passively listened to the auditory stimuli. In all three conditions, significant activation was observed bilaterally in channels targeting superior temporal regions when stimuli were contrasted against silence. Unlike previous findings in infants, we found no significant activation in the region of interest over superior temporal cortex in school-age children when normal speech was contrasted against either TR speech or SCN. Although no statistically significant lateralisation effects were observed in the region of interest, a left-sided channel targeting posterior temporal regions showed significant activity in response to normal speech only, and was investigated further. Significantly greater activation was observed in this left posterior channel compared to the corresponding channel on the right side under the normal speech vs SCN contrast only. Our findings suggest that neither TR speech nor SCN are suitable auditory baselines for functionally isolating speech-specific processing in an experimental set up involving fNIRS with 6–12 year old children. Public Library of Science 2019-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6636749/ /pubmed/31314802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219927 Text en © 2019 Mushtaq et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mushtaq, Faizah
Wiggins, Ian M.
Kitterick, Pádraig T.
Anderson, Carly A.
Hartley, Douglas E. H.
Evaluating time-reversed speech and signal-correlated noise as auditory baselines for isolating speech-specific processing using fNIRS
title Evaluating time-reversed speech and signal-correlated noise as auditory baselines for isolating speech-specific processing using fNIRS
title_full Evaluating time-reversed speech and signal-correlated noise as auditory baselines for isolating speech-specific processing using fNIRS
title_fullStr Evaluating time-reversed speech and signal-correlated noise as auditory baselines for isolating speech-specific processing using fNIRS
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating time-reversed speech and signal-correlated noise as auditory baselines for isolating speech-specific processing using fNIRS
title_short Evaluating time-reversed speech and signal-correlated noise as auditory baselines for isolating speech-specific processing using fNIRS
title_sort evaluating time-reversed speech and signal-correlated noise as auditory baselines for isolating speech-specific processing using fnirs
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6636749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31314802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219927
work_keys_str_mv AT mushtaqfaizah evaluatingtimereversedspeechandsignalcorrelatednoiseasauditorybaselinesforisolatingspeechspecificprocessingusingfnirs
AT wigginsianm evaluatingtimereversedspeechandsignalcorrelatednoiseasauditorybaselinesforisolatingspeechspecificprocessingusingfnirs
AT kitterickpadraigt evaluatingtimereversedspeechandsignalcorrelatednoiseasauditorybaselinesforisolatingspeechspecificprocessingusingfnirs
AT andersoncarlya evaluatingtimereversedspeechandsignalcorrelatednoiseasauditorybaselinesforisolatingspeechspecificprocessingusingfnirs
AT hartleydouglaseh evaluatingtimereversedspeechandsignalcorrelatednoiseasauditorybaselinesforisolatingspeechspecificprocessingusingfnirs