Cargando…

What drives us apart? Decomposing intersectional inequalities in cigarette smoking by education and sexual orientation among U.S. adults

BACKGROUND: Socio-economic and sexual orientation inequalities in cigarette smoking are well-documented; however, there is a lack of research examining the social processes driving these complex inequalities. Using an intersectional framework, the current study examines key processes contributing to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amroussia, Nada, Pearson, Jennifer L., Gustafsson, Per E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6637561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31315627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1015-1
_version_ 1783436266058022912
author Amroussia, Nada
Pearson, Jennifer L.
Gustafsson, Per E.
author_facet Amroussia, Nada
Pearson, Jennifer L.
Gustafsson, Per E.
author_sort Amroussia, Nada
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Socio-economic and sexual orientation inequalities in cigarette smoking are well-documented; however, there is a lack of research examining the social processes driving these complex inequalities. Using an intersectional framework, the current study examines key processes contributing to inequalities in smoking between four intersectional groups by education and sexual orientation. METHODS: The sample (28,362 adults) was obtained from Wave 2 (2014–2015) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. Four intersectional positions were created by education (high- and low-education) and sexual orientation (heterosexual or lesbian, gay, bisexual, or queer/questioning (LGBQ). The joint inequality, the referent socio-economic inequality, and the referent sexual orientation inequality in smoking were decomposed by demographic, material, tobacco marketing-related, and psychosocial factors using non-linear Oaxaca decomposition. RESULTS: Material conditions made the largest contribution to the joint inequality (9.8 percentage points (p.p.), 140.9%), referent socio-economic inequality (10.01 p.p., 128.4%), and referent sexual orientation inequality (4.91 p.p., 59.8%), driven by annual household income. Psychosocial factors made the second largest contributions to the joint inequality (2.12 p.p., 30.3%), referent socio-economic inequality (2.23 p.p., 28.9%), and referent sexual orientation inequality (1.68 p.p., 20.5%). Referent sexual orientation inequality was also explained by marital status (20.3%) and targeted tobacco marketing (11.3%). CONCLUSION: The study highlights the pervasive role of material conditions in inequalities in cigarette smoking across multiple dimensions of advantage and disadvantage. This points to the importance of addressing material disadvantage to reduce combined socioeconomic and sexual orientation inequalities in cigarette smoking.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6637561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66375612019-07-25 What drives us apart? Decomposing intersectional inequalities in cigarette smoking by education and sexual orientation among U.S. adults Amroussia, Nada Pearson, Jennifer L. Gustafsson, Per E. Int J Equity Health Research BACKGROUND: Socio-economic and sexual orientation inequalities in cigarette smoking are well-documented; however, there is a lack of research examining the social processes driving these complex inequalities. Using an intersectional framework, the current study examines key processes contributing to inequalities in smoking between four intersectional groups by education and sexual orientation. METHODS: The sample (28,362 adults) was obtained from Wave 2 (2014–2015) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. Four intersectional positions were created by education (high- and low-education) and sexual orientation (heterosexual or lesbian, gay, bisexual, or queer/questioning (LGBQ). The joint inequality, the referent socio-economic inequality, and the referent sexual orientation inequality in smoking were decomposed by demographic, material, tobacco marketing-related, and psychosocial factors using non-linear Oaxaca decomposition. RESULTS: Material conditions made the largest contribution to the joint inequality (9.8 percentage points (p.p.), 140.9%), referent socio-economic inequality (10.01 p.p., 128.4%), and referent sexual orientation inequality (4.91 p.p., 59.8%), driven by annual household income. Psychosocial factors made the second largest contributions to the joint inequality (2.12 p.p., 30.3%), referent socio-economic inequality (2.23 p.p., 28.9%), and referent sexual orientation inequality (1.68 p.p., 20.5%). Referent sexual orientation inequality was also explained by marital status (20.3%) and targeted tobacco marketing (11.3%). CONCLUSION: The study highlights the pervasive role of material conditions in inequalities in cigarette smoking across multiple dimensions of advantage and disadvantage. This points to the importance of addressing material disadvantage to reduce combined socioeconomic and sexual orientation inequalities in cigarette smoking. BioMed Central 2019-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6637561/ /pubmed/31315627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1015-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Amroussia, Nada
Pearson, Jennifer L.
Gustafsson, Per E.
What drives us apart? Decomposing intersectional inequalities in cigarette smoking by education and sexual orientation among U.S. adults
title What drives us apart? Decomposing intersectional inequalities in cigarette smoking by education and sexual orientation among U.S. adults
title_full What drives us apart? Decomposing intersectional inequalities in cigarette smoking by education and sexual orientation among U.S. adults
title_fullStr What drives us apart? Decomposing intersectional inequalities in cigarette smoking by education and sexual orientation among U.S. adults
title_full_unstemmed What drives us apart? Decomposing intersectional inequalities in cigarette smoking by education and sexual orientation among U.S. adults
title_short What drives us apart? Decomposing intersectional inequalities in cigarette smoking by education and sexual orientation among U.S. adults
title_sort what drives us apart? decomposing intersectional inequalities in cigarette smoking by education and sexual orientation among u.s. adults
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6637561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31315627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1015-1
work_keys_str_mv AT amroussianada whatdrivesusapartdecomposingintersectionalinequalitiesincigarettesmokingbyeducationandsexualorientationamongusadults
AT pearsonjenniferl whatdrivesusapartdecomposingintersectionalinequalitiesincigarettesmokingbyeducationandsexualorientationamongusadults
AT gustafssonpere whatdrivesusapartdecomposingintersectionalinequalitiesincigarettesmokingbyeducationandsexualorientationamongusadults