Cargando…
What drives us apart? Decomposing intersectional inequalities in cigarette smoking by education and sexual orientation among U.S. adults
BACKGROUND: Socio-economic and sexual orientation inequalities in cigarette smoking are well-documented; however, there is a lack of research examining the social processes driving these complex inequalities. Using an intersectional framework, the current study examines key processes contributing to...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6637561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31315627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1015-1 |
_version_ | 1783436266058022912 |
---|---|
author | Amroussia, Nada Pearson, Jennifer L. Gustafsson, Per E. |
author_facet | Amroussia, Nada Pearson, Jennifer L. Gustafsson, Per E. |
author_sort | Amroussia, Nada |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Socio-economic and sexual orientation inequalities in cigarette smoking are well-documented; however, there is a lack of research examining the social processes driving these complex inequalities. Using an intersectional framework, the current study examines key processes contributing to inequalities in smoking between four intersectional groups by education and sexual orientation. METHODS: The sample (28,362 adults) was obtained from Wave 2 (2014–2015) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. Four intersectional positions were created by education (high- and low-education) and sexual orientation (heterosexual or lesbian, gay, bisexual, or queer/questioning (LGBQ). The joint inequality, the referent socio-economic inequality, and the referent sexual orientation inequality in smoking were decomposed by demographic, material, tobacco marketing-related, and psychosocial factors using non-linear Oaxaca decomposition. RESULTS: Material conditions made the largest contribution to the joint inequality (9.8 percentage points (p.p.), 140.9%), referent socio-economic inequality (10.01 p.p., 128.4%), and referent sexual orientation inequality (4.91 p.p., 59.8%), driven by annual household income. Psychosocial factors made the second largest contributions to the joint inequality (2.12 p.p., 30.3%), referent socio-economic inequality (2.23 p.p., 28.9%), and referent sexual orientation inequality (1.68 p.p., 20.5%). Referent sexual orientation inequality was also explained by marital status (20.3%) and targeted tobacco marketing (11.3%). CONCLUSION: The study highlights the pervasive role of material conditions in inequalities in cigarette smoking across multiple dimensions of advantage and disadvantage. This points to the importance of addressing material disadvantage to reduce combined socioeconomic and sexual orientation inequalities in cigarette smoking. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6637561 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66375612019-07-25 What drives us apart? Decomposing intersectional inequalities in cigarette smoking by education and sexual orientation among U.S. adults Amroussia, Nada Pearson, Jennifer L. Gustafsson, Per E. Int J Equity Health Research BACKGROUND: Socio-economic and sexual orientation inequalities in cigarette smoking are well-documented; however, there is a lack of research examining the social processes driving these complex inequalities. Using an intersectional framework, the current study examines key processes contributing to inequalities in smoking between four intersectional groups by education and sexual orientation. METHODS: The sample (28,362 adults) was obtained from Wave 2 (2014–2015) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. Four intersectional positions were created by education (high- and low-education) and sexual orientation (heterosexual or lesbian, gay, bisexual, or queer/questioning (LGBQ). The joint inequality, the referent socio-economic inequality, and the referent sexual orientation inequality in smoking were decomposed by demographic, material, tobacco marketing-related, and psychosocial factors using non-linear Oaxaca decomposition. RESULTS: Material conditions made the largest contribution to the joint inequality (9.8 percentage points (p.p.), 140.9%), referent socio-economic inequality (10.01 p.p., 128.4%), and referent sexual orientation inequality (4.91 p.p., 59.8%), driven by annual household income. Psychosocial factors made the second largest contributions to the joint inequality (2.12 p.p., 30.3%), referent socio-economic inequality (2.23 p.p., 28.9%), and referent sexual orientation inequality (1.68 p.p., 20.5%). Referent sexual orientation inequality was also explained by marital status (20.3%) and targeted tobacco marketing (11.3%). CONCLUSION: The study highlights the pervasive role of material conditions in inequalities in cigarette smoking across multiple dimensions of advantage and disadvantage. This points to the importance of addressing material disadvantage to reduce combined socioeconomic and sexual orientation inequalities in cigarette smoking. BioMed Central 2019-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6637561/ /pubmed/31315627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1015-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Amroussia, Nada Pearson, Jennifer L. Gustafsson, Per E. What drives us apart? Decomposing intersectional inequalities in cigarette smoking by education and sexual orientation among U.S. adults |
title | What drives us apart? Decomposing intersectional inequalities in cigarette smoking by education and sexual orientation among U.S. adults |
title_full | What drives us apart? Decomposing intersectional inequalities in cigarette smoking by education and sexual orientation among U.S. adults |
title_fullStr | What drives us apart? Decomposing intersectional inequalities in cigarette smoking by education and sexual orientation among U.S. adults |
title_full_unstemmed | What drives us apart? Decomposing intersectional inequalities in cigarette smoking by education and sexual orientation among U.S. adults |
title_short | What drives us apart? Decomposing intersectional inequalities in cigarette smoking by education and sexual orientation among U.S. adults |
title_sort | what drives us apart? decomposing intersectional inequalities in cigarette smoking by education and sexual orientation among u.s. adults |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6637561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31315627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1015-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amroussianada whatdrivesusapartdecomposingintersectionalinequalitiesincigarettesmokingbyeducationandsexualorientationamongusadults AT pearsonjenniferl whatdrivesusapartdecomposingintersectionalinequalitiesincigarettesmokingbyeducationandsexualorientationamongusadults AT gustafssonpere whatdrivesusapartdecomposingintersectionalinequalitiesincigarettesmokingbyeducationandsexualorientationamongusadults |