Cargando…

Biomarkers for diagnosing serious bacterial infections in older outpatients: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: The value of biomarkers for diagnosing bacterial infections in older outpatients is uncertain and limited official guidance exists for clinicians in this area. The aim of this review is to critically appraise and evaluate biomarkers for diagnosing bacterial infections in older adults (ag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gbinigie, Oghenekome A., Onakpoya, Igho J., Richards, Georgia C., Spencer, Elizabeth A., Koshiaris, Constantinos, Bobrovitz, Niklas, Heneghan, Carl J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6637629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31315578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1205-0
_version_ 1783436282300465152
author Gbinigie, Oghenekome A.
Onakpoya, Igho J.
Richards, Georgia C.
Spencer, Elizabeth A.
Koshiaris, Constantinos
Bobrovitz, Niklas
Heneghan, Carl J.
author_facet Gbinigie, Oghenekome A.
Onakpoya, Igho J.
Richards, Georgia C.
Spencer, Elizabeth A.
Koshiaris, Constantinos
Bobrovitz, Niklas
Heneghan, Carl J.
author_sort Gbinigie, Oghenekome A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The value of biomarkers for diagnosing bacterial infections in older outpatients is uncertain and limited official guidance exists for clinicians in this area. The aim of this review is to critically appraise and evaluate biomarkers for diagnosing bacterial infections in older adults (aged 65 years and above). METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library, from inception to January 2018. We included studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of blood, urinary, and salivary biomarkers in diagnosing bacterial infections in older adults. The QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess study quality. RESULTS: We identified 11 eligible studies of moderate quality (11,034 participants) including 51 biomarkers at varying thresholds for diagnosing bacterial infections. An elevated Procalcitonin (≥ 0.2 ng/mL) may help diagnose bacteraemia in older adults [+ve LR range 1.50 to 2.60]. A CRP ≥ 50 mg/L only raises the probability of bacteraemia by 5%. A positive urine dipstick aids diagnosis of UTI (+ve LR range 1.23 to 54.90), and absence helps rule out UTI (−ve LR range 0.06 to 0.46). An elevated white blood cell count is unhelpful in diagnosing intra-abdominal infections (+ve LR range 0.75 to 2.62), but may aid differentiation of bacterial infection from other acute illness (+ve LR range 2.14 to 7.12). CONCLUSIONS: The limited available evidence suggests that many diagnostic tests useful in younger patients, do not help to diagnose bacterial infections in older adults. Further evidence from high quality studies is urgently needed to guide clinical practice. Until then, symptoms and signs remain the mainstay of diagnosis in community based populations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-019-1205-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6637629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66376292019-07-25 Biomarkers for diagnosing serious bacterial infections in older outpatients: a systematic review Gbinigie, Oghenekome A. Onakpoya, Igho J. Richards, Georgia C. Spencer, Elizabeth A. Koshiaris, Constantinos Bobrovitz, Niklas Heneghan, Carl J. BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: The value of biomarkers for diagnosing bacterial infections in older outpatients is uncertain and limited official guidance exists for clinicians in this area. The aim of this review is to critically appraise and evaluate biomarkers for diagnosing bacterial infections in older adults (aged 65 years and above). METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library, from inception to January 2018. We included studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of blood, urinary, and salivary biomarkers in diagnosing bacterial infections in older adults. The QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess study quality. RESULTS: We identified 11 eligible studies of moderate quality (11,034 participants) including 51 biomarkers at varying thresholds for diagnosing bacterial infections. An elevated Procalcitonin (≥ 0.2 ng/mL) may help diagnose bacteraemia in older adults [+ve LR range 1.50 to 2.60]. A CRP ≥ 50 mg/L only raises the probability of bacteraemia by 5%. A positive urine dipstick aids diagnosis of UTI (+ve LR range 1.23 to 54.90), and absence helps rule out UTI (−ve LR range 0.06 to 0.46). An elevated white blood cell count is unhelpful in diagnosing intra-abdominal infections (+ve LR range 0.75 to 2.62), but may aid differentiation of bacterial infection from other acute illness (+ve LR range 2.14 to 7.12). CONCLUSIONS: The limited available evidence suggests that many diagnostic tests useful in younger patients, do not help to diagnose bacterial infections in older adults. Further evidence from high quality studies is urgently needed to guide clinical practice. Until then, symptoms and signs remain the mainstay of diagnosis in community based populations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-019-1205-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6637629/ /pubmed/31315578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1205-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gbinigie, Oghenekome A.
Onakpoya, Igho J.
Richards, Georgia C.
Spencer, Elizabeth A.
Koshiaris, Constantinos
Bobrovitz, Niklas
Heneghan, Carl J.
Biomarkers for diagnosing serious bacterial infections in older outpatients: a systematic review
title Biomarkers for diagnosing serious bacterial infections in older outpatients: a systematic review
title_full Biomarkers for diagnosing serious bacterial infections in older outpatients: a systematic review
title_fullStr Biomarkers for diagnosing serious bacterial infections in older outpatients: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Biomarkers for diagnosing serious bacterial infections in older outpatients: a systematic review
title_short Biomarkers for diagnosing serious bacterial infections in older outpatients: a systematic review
title_sort biomarkers for diagnosing serious bacterial infections in older outpatients: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6637629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31315578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1205-0
work_keys_str_mv AT gbinigieoghenekomea biomarkersfordiagnosingseriousbacterialinfectionsinolderoutpatientsasystematicreview
AT onakpoyaighoj biomarkersfordiagnosingseriousbacterialinfectionsinolderoutpatientsasystematicreview
AT richardsgeorgiac biomarkersfordiagnosingseriousbacterialinfectionsinolderoutpatientsasystematicreview
AT spencerelizabetha biomarkersfordiagnosingseriousbacterialinfectionsinolderoutpatientsasystematicreview
AT koshiarisconstantinos biomarkersfordiagnosingseriousbacterialinfectionsinolderoutpatientsasystematicreview
AT bobrovitzniklas biomarkersfordiagnosingseriousbacterialinfectionsinolderoutpatientsasystematicreview
AT heneghancarlj biomarkersfordiagnosingseriousbacterialinfectionsinolderoutpatientsasystematicreview