Cargando…
Biomarkers for diagnosing serious bacterial infections in older outpatients: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: The value of biomarkers for diagnosing bacterial infections in older outpatients is uncertain and limited official guidance exists for clinicians in this area. The aim of this review is to critically appraise and evaluate biomarkers for diagnosing bacterial infections in older adults (ag...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6637629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31315578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1205-0 |
_version_ | 1783436282300465152 |
---|---|
author | Gbinigie, Oghenekome A. Onakpoya, Igho J. Richards, Georgia C. Spencer, Elizabeth A. Koshiaris, Constantinos Bobrovitz, Niklas Heneghan, Carl J. |
author_facet | Gbinigie, Oghenekome A. Onakpoya, Igho J. Richards, Georgia C. Spencer, Elizabeth A. Koshiaris, Constantinos Bobrovitz, Niklas Heneghan, Carl J. |
author_sort | Gbinigie, Oghenekome A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The value of biomarkers for diagnosing bacterial infections in older outpatients is uncertain and limited official guidance exists for clinicians in this area. The aim of this review is to critically appraise and evaluate biomarkers for diagnosing bacterial infections in older adults (aged 65 years and above). METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library, from inception to January 2018. We included studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of blood, urinary, and salivary biomarkers in diagnosing bacterial infections in older adults. The QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess study quality. RESULTS: We identified 11 eligible studies of moderate quality (11,034 participants) including 51 biomarkers at varying thresholds for diagnosing bacterial infections. An elevated Procalcitonin (≥ 0.2 ng/mL) may help diagnose bacteraemia in older adults [+ve LR range 1.50 to 2.60]. A CRP ≥ 50 mg/L only raises the probability of bacteraemia by 5%. A positive urine dipstick aids diagnosis of UTI (+ve LR range 1.23 to 54.90), and absence helps rule out UTI (−ve LR range 0.06 to 0.46). An elevated white blood cell count is unhelpful in diagnosing intra-abdominal infections (+ve LR range 0.75 to 2.62), but may aid differentiation of bacterial infection from other acute illness (+ve LR range 2.14 to 7.12). CONCLUSIONS: The limited available evidence suggests that many diagnostic tests useful in younger patients, do not help to diagnose bacterial infections in older adults. Further evidence from high quality studies is urgently needed to guide clinical practice. Until then, symptoms and signs remain the mainstay of diagnosis in community based populations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-019-1205-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6637629 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66376292019-07-25 Biomarkers for diagnosing serious bacterial infections in older outpatients: a systematic review Gbinigie, Oghenekome A. Onakpoya, Igho J. Richards, Georgia C. Spencer, Elizabeth A. Koshiaris, Constantinos Bobrovitz, Niklas Heneghan, Carl J. BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: The value of biomarkers for diagnosing bacterial infections in older outpatients is uncertain and limited official guidance exists for clinicians in this area. The aim of this review is to critically appraise and evaluate biomarkers for diagnosing bacterial infections in older adults (aged 65 years and above). METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library, from inception to January 2018. We included studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of blood, urinary, and salivary biomarkers in diagnosing bacterial infections in older adults. The QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess study quality. RESULTS: We identified 11 eligible studies of moderate quality (11,034 participants) including 51 biomarkers at varying thresholds for diagnosing bacterial infections. An elevated Procalcitonin (≥ 0.2 ng/mL) may help diagnose bacteraemia in older adults [+ve LR range 1.50 to 2.60]. A CRP ≥ 50 mg/L only raises the probability of bacteraemia by 5%. A positive urine dipstick aids diagnosis of UTI (+ve LR range 1.23 to 54.90), and absence helps rule out UTI (−ve LR range 0.06 to 0.46). An elevated white blood cell count is unhelpful in diagnosing intra-abdominal infections (+ve LR range 0.75 to 2.62), but may aid differentiation of bacterial infection from other acute illness (+ve LR range 2.14 to 7.12). CONCLUSIONS: The limited available evidence suggests that many diagnostic tests useful in younger patients, do not help to diagnose bacterial infections in older adults. Further evidence from high quality studies is urgently needed to guide clinical practice. Until then, symptoms and signs remain the mainstay of diagnosis in community based populations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-019-1205-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6637629/ /pubmed/31315578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1205-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gbinigie, Oghenekome A. Onakpoya, Igho J. Richards, Georgia C. Spencer, Elizabeth A. Koshiaris, Constantinos Bobrovitz, Niklas Heneghan, Carl J. Biomarkers for diagnosing serious bacterial infections in older outpatients: a systematic review |
title | Biomarkers for diagnosing serious bacterial infections in older outpatients: a systematic review |
title_full | Biomarkers for diagnosing serious bacterial infections in older outpatients: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Biomarkers for diagnosing serious bacterial infections in older outpatients: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomarkers for diagnosing serious bacterial infections in older outpatients: a systematic review |
title_short | Biomarkers for diagnosing serious bacterial infections in older outpatients: a systematic review |
title_sort | biomarkers for diagnosing serious bacterial infections in older outpatients: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6637629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31315578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1205-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gbinigieoghenekomea biomarkersfordiagnosingseriousbacterialinfectionsinolderoutpatientsasystematicreview AT onakpoyaighoj biomarkersfordiagnosingseriousbacterialinfectionsinolderoutpatientsasystematicreview AT richardsgeorgiac biomarkersfordiagnosingseriousbacterialinfectionsinolderoutpatientsasystematicreview AT spencerelizabetha biomarkersfordiagnosingseriousbacterialinfectionsinolderoutpatientsasystematicreview AT koshiarisconstantinos biomarkersfordiagnosingseriousbacterialinfectionsinolderoutpatientsasystematicreview AT bobrovitzniklas biomarkersfordiagnosingseriousbacterialinfectionsinolderoutpatientsasystematicreview AT heneghancarlj biomarkersfordiagnosingseriousbacterialinfectionsinolderoutpatientsasystematicreview |