Cargando…
How Long Is Too Long: An Individual Time-Window for Motor Planning
Human motor response time (RT) is determined by the matureness of the preceding neural motor planning process. In the current study, we characterize the temporal boundaries required for the motor planning process, and its impact on the overall motor RT. In particular, we contrasted short and long pl...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6637772/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31354455 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00238 |
_version_ | 1783436307063635968 |
---|---|
author | Dahan, Anat Bennet, Rotem Reiner, Miriam |
author_facet | Dahan, Anat Bennet, Rotem Reiner, Miriam |
author_sort | Dahan, Anat |
collection | PubMed |
description | Human motor response time (RT) is determined by the matureness of the preceding neural motor planning process. In the current study, we characterize the temporal boundaries required for the motor planning process, and its impact on the overall motor RT. In particular, we contrasted short and long planning times by measuring the resulting differences in motor RTs, in an attempt to find whether an optimal planning time for minimal RT exists. Using a “Timed Response” paradigm, we presented participants with varying planning intervals prior to a requested motor response and studied their effect on the timing of initiation of the following movement. We found that, as expected, reaction time shortens as more planning time is provided, yet only until reaching a minimal RT, after which additional planning time increases the motor RT, thus creating a U-shaped behavioral function. Furthermore, since the minimal RT was found to be an individual characteristic, we suggest that there is an individual time window for motor planning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6637772 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66377722019-07-26 How Long Is Too Long: An Individual Time-Window for Motor Planning Dahan, Anat Bennet, Rotem Reiner, Miriam Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Human motor response time (RT) is determined by the matureness of the preceding neural motor planning process. In the current study, we characterize the temporal boundaries required for the motor planning process, and its impact on the overall motor RT. In particular, we contrasted short and long planning times by measuring the resulting differences in motor RTs, in an attempt to find whether an optimal planning time for minimal RT exists. Using a “Timed Response” paradigm, we presented participants with varying planning intervals prior to a requested motor response and studied their effect on the timing of initiation of the following movement. We found that, as expected, reaction time shortens as more planning time is provided, yet only until reaching a minimal RT, after which additional planning time increases the motor RT, thus creating a U-shaped behavioral function. Furthermore, since the minimal RT was found to be an individual characteristic, we suggest that there is an individual time window for motor planning. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6637772/ /pubmed/31354455 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00238 Text en Copyright © 2019 Dahan, Bennet and Reiner. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Dahan, Anat Bennet, Rotem Reiner, Miriam How Long Is Too Long: An Individual Time-Window for Motor Planning |
title | How Long Is Too Long: An Individual Time-Window for Motor Planning |
title_full | How Long Is Too Long: An Individual Time-Window for Motor Planning |
title_fullStr | How Long Is Too Long: An Individual Time-Window for Motor Planning |
title_full_unstemmed | How Long Is Too Long: An Individual Time-Window for Motor Planning |
title_short | How Long Is Too Long: An Individual Time-Window for Motor Planning |
title_sort | how long is too long: an individual time-window for motor planning |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6637772/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31354455 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dahananat howlongistoolonganindividualtimewindowformotorplanning AT bennetrotem howlongistoolonganindividualtimewindowformotorplanning AT reinermiriam howlongistoolonganindividualtimewindowformotorplanning |