Cargando…

Living in Biological Darkness: Objective Sleepiness and the Pupillary Light Responses Are Affected by Different Metameric Lighting Conditions during Daytime

Nighttime melatonin suppression is the most commonly used method to indirectly quantify acute nonvisual light effects. Since light is the principal zeitgeber in humans, there is a need to assess its strength during daytime as well. This is especially important since humans evolved under natural dayl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Zeeuw, Jan, Papakonstantinou, Alexandra, Nowozin, Claudia, Stotz, Sophia, Zaleska, Mandy, Hädel, Sven, Bes, Frederik, Münch, Mirjam, Kunz, Dieter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6637815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31156018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0748730419847845
_version_ 1783436316756672512
author de Zeeuw, Jan
Papakonstantinou, Alexandra
Nowozin, Claudia
Stotz, Sophia
Zaleska, Mandy
Hädel, Sven
Bes, Frederik
Münch, Mirjam
Kunz, Dieter
author_facet de Zeeuw, Jan
Papakonstantinou, Alexandra
Nowozin, Claudia
Stotz, Sophia
Zaleska, Mandy
Hädel, Sven
Bes, Frederik
Münch, Mirjam
Kunz, Dieter
author_sort de Zeeuw, Jan
collection PubMed
description Nighttime melatonin suppression is the most commonly used method to indirectly quantify acute nonvisual light effects. Since light is the principal zeitgeber in humans, there is a need to assess its strength during daytime as well. This is especially important since humans evolved under natural daylight but now often spend their time indoors under artificial light, resulting in a different quality and quantity of light. We tested whether the pupillary light response (PLR) could be used as a marker for nonvisual light effects during daytime. We also recorded the wake electroencephalogram to objectively determine changes in daytime sleepiness between different illuminance levels and/or spectral compositions of light. In total, 72 participants visited the laboratory 4 times for 3-h light exposures. All participants underwent a dim-light condition and either 3 metameric daytime light exposures with different spectral compositions of polychromatic white light (100 photopic lux, peak wavelengths at 435 nm or 480 nm, enriched with longer wavelengths of light) or 3 different illuminances (200, 600, and 1200 photopic lux) with 1 metameric lighting condition (peak wavelength at 435 nm or 480 nm; 24 participants each). The results show that the PLR was sensitive to both spectral differences between metameric lighting conditions and different illuminances in a dose-responsive manner, depending on melanopic irradiance. Objective sleepiness was significantly reduced, depending on melanopic irradiance, at low illuminance (100 lux) and showed fewer differences at higher illuminance. Since many people are exposed to such low illuminance for most of their day—living in biological darkness—our results imply that optimizing the light spectrum could be important to improve daytime alertness. Our results suggest the PLR as a noninvasive physiological marker for ambient light exposure effects during daytime. These findings may be applied to assess light-dependent zeitgeber strength and evaluate lighting improvements at workplaces, schools, hospitals, and homes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6637815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66378152019-08-22 Living in Biological Darkness: Objective Sleepiness and the Pupillary Light Responses Are Affected by Different Metameric Lighting Conditions during Daytime de Zeeuw, Jan Papakonstantinou, Alexandra Nowozin, Claudia Stotz, Sophia Zaleska, Mandy Hädel, Sven Bes, Frederik Münch, Mirjam Kunz, Dieter J Biol Rhythms Original Articles Nighttime melatonin suppression is the most commonly used method to indirectly quantify acute nonvisual light effects. Since light is the principal zeitgeber in humans, there is a need to assess its strength during daytime as well. This is especially important since humans evolved under natural daylight but now often spend their time indoors under artificial light, resulting in a different quality and quantity of light. We tested whether the pupillary light response (PLR) could be used as a marker for nonvisual light effects during daytime. We also recorded the wake electroencephalogram to objectively determine changes in daytime sleepiness between different illuminance levels and/or spectral compositions of light. In total, 72 participants visited the laboratory 4 times for 3-h light exposures. All participants underwent a dim-light condition and either 3 metameric daytime light exposures with different spectral compositions of polychromatic white light (100 photopic lux, peak wavelengths at 435 nm or 480 nm, enriched with longer wavelengths of light) or 3 different illuminances (200, 600, and 1200 photopic lux) with 1 metameric lighting condition (peak wavelength at 435 nm or 480 nm; 24 participants each). The results show that the PLR was sensitive to both spectral differences between metameric lighting conditions and different illuminances in a dose-responsive manner, depending on melanopic irradiance. Objective sleepiness was significantly reduced, depending on melanopic irradiance, at low illuminance (100 lux) and showed fewer differences at higher illuminance. Since many people are exposed to such low illuminance for most of their day—living in biological darkness—our results imply that optimizing the light spectrum could be important to improve daytime alertness. Our results suggest the PLR as a noninvasive physiological marker for ambient light exposure effects during daytime. These findings may be applied to assess light-dependent zeitgeber strength and evaluate lighting improvements at workplaces, schools, hospitals, and homes. SAGE Publications 2019-06-02 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6637815/ /pubmed/31156018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0748730419847845 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
de Zeeuw, Jan
Papakonstantinou, Alexandra
Nowozin, Claudia
Stotz, Sophia
Zaleska, Mandy
Hädel, Sven
Bes, Frederik
Münch, Mirjam
Kunz, Dieter
Living in Biological Darkness: Objective Sleepiness and the Pupillary Light Responses Are Affected by Different Metameric Lighting Conditions during Daytime
title Living in Biological Darkness: Objective Sleepiness and the Pupillary Light Responses Are Affected by Different Metameric Lighting Conditions during Daytime
title_full Living in Biological Darkness: Objective Sleepiness and the Pupillary Light Responses Are Affected by Different Metameric Lighting Conditions during Daytime
title_fullStr Living in Biological Darkness: Objective Sleepiness and the Pupillary Light Responses Are Affected by Different Metameric Lighting Conditions during Daytime
title_full_unstemmed Living in Biological Darkness: Objective Sleepiness and the Pupillary Light Responses Are Affected by Different Metameric Lighting Conditions during Daytime
title_short Living in Biological Darkness: Objective Sleepiness and the Pupillary Light Responses Are Affected by Different Metameric Lighting Conditions during Daytime
title_sort living in biological darkness: objective sleepiness and the pupillary light responses are affected by different metameric lighting conditions during daytime
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6637815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31156018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0748730419847845
work_keys_str_mv AT dezeeuwjan livinginbiologicaldarknessobjectivesleepinessandthepupillarylightresponsesareaffectedbydifferentmetamericlightingconditionsduringdaytime
AT papakonstantinoualexandra livinginbiologicaldarknessobjectivesleepinessandthepupillarylightresponsesareaffectedbydifferentmetamericlightingconditionsduringdaytime
AT nowozinclaudia livinginbiologicaldarknessobjectivesleepinessandthepupillarylightresponsesareaffectedbydifferentmetamericlightingconditionsduringdaytime
AT stotzsophia livinginbiologicaldarknessobjectivesleepinessandthepupillarylightresponsesareaffectedbydifferentmetamericlightingconditionsduringdaytime
AT zaleskamandy livinginbiologicaldarknessobjectivesleepinessandthepupillarylightresponsesareaffectedbydifferentmetamericlightingconditionsduringdaytime
AT hadelsven livinginbiologicaldarknessobjectivesleepinessandthepupillarylightresponsesareaffectedbydifferentmetamericlightingconditionsduringdaytime
AT besfrederik livinginbiologicaldarknessobjectivesleepinessandthepupillarylightresponsesareaffectedbydifferentmetamericlightingconditionsduringdaytime
AT munchmirjam livinginbiologicaldarknessobjectivesleepinessandthepupillarylightresponsesareaffectedbydifferentmetamericlightingconditionsduringdaytime
AT kunzdieter livinginbiologicaldarknessobjectivesleepinessandthepupillarylightresponsesareaffectedbydifferentmetamericlightingconditionsduringdaytime