Cargando…

Differential roles of glucosinolates and camalexin at different stages of Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation

Agrobacterium tumefaciens is the causal agent of crown gall disease in a wide range of plants via a unique interkingdom DNA transfer from bacterial cells into the plant genome. Agrobacterium tumefaciens is capable of transferring its T‐DNA into different plant parts at different developmental stages...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shih, Po‐Yuan, Chou, Shu‐Jen, Müller, Caroline, Halkier, Barbara Ann, Deeken, Rosalia, Lai, Erh‐Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6638096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29498790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12672
_version_ 1783436348478193664
author Shih, Po‐Yuan
Chou, Shu‐Jen
Müller, Caroline
Halkier, Barbara Ann
Deeken, Rosalia
Lai, Erh‐Min
author_facet Shih, Po‐Yuan
Chou, Shu‐Jen
Müller, Caroline
Halkier, Barbara Ann
Deeken, Rosalia
Lai, Erh‐Min
author_sort Shih, Po‐Yuan
collection PubMed
description Agrobacterium tumefaciens is the causal agent of crown gall disease in a wide range of plants via a unique interkingdom DNA transfer from bacterial cells into the plant genome. Agrobacterium tumefaciens is capable of transferring its T‐DNA into different plant parts at different developmental stages for transient and stable transformation. However, the plant genes and mechanisms involved in these transformation processes are not well understood. We used Arabidopsis thaliana Col‐0 seedlings to reveal the gene expression profiles at early time points during Agrobacterium infection. Common and differentially expressed genes were found in shoots and roots. A gene ontology analysis showed that the glucosinolate (GS) biosynthesis pathway was an enriched common response. Strikingly, several genes involved in indole glucosinolate (iGS) modification and the camalexin biosynthesis pathway were up‐regulated, whereas genes in aliphatic glucosinolate (aGS) biosynthesis were generally down‐regulated, on Agrobacterium infection. Thus, we evaluated the impacts of GSs and camalexin during different stages of Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation combining Arabidopsis mutant studies, metabolite profiling and exogenous applications of various GS hydrolysis products or camalexin. The results suggest that the iGS hydrolysis pathway plays an inhibitory role on transformation efficiency in Arabidopsis seedlings at the early infection stage. Later in the Agrobacterium infection process, the accumulation of camalexin is a key factor inhibiting tumour development on Arabidopsis inflorescence stalks. In conclusion, this study reveals the differential roles of GSs and camalexin at different stages of Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation and provides new insights into crown gall disease control and improvement of plant transformation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6638096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66380962019-09-16 Differential roles of glucosinolates and camalexin at different stages of Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation Shih, Po‐Yuan Chou, Shu‐Jen Müller, Caroline Halkier, Barbara Ann Deeken, Rosalia Lai, Erh‐Min Mol Plant Pathol Original Articles Agrobacterium tumefaciens is the causal agent of crown gall disease in a wide range of plants via a unique interkingdom DNA transfer from bacterial cells into the plant genome. Agrobacterium tumefaciens is capable of transferring its T‐DNA into different plant parts at different developmental stages for transient and stable transformation. However, the plant genes and mechanisms involved in these transformation processes are not well understood. We used Arabidopsis thaliana Col‐0 seedlings to reveal the gene expression profiles at early time points during Agrobacterium infection. Common and differentially expressed genes were found in shoots and roots. A gene ontology analysis showed that the glucosinolate (GS) biosynthesis pathway was an enriched common response. Strikingly, several genes involved in indole glucosinolate (iGS) modification and the camalexin biosynthesis pathway were up‐regulated, whereas genes in aliphatic glucosinolate (aGS) biosynthesis were generally down‐regulated, on Agrobacterium infection. Thus, we evaluated the impacts of GSs and camalexin during different stages of Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation combining Arabidopsis mutant studies, metabolite profiling and exogenous applications of various GS hydrolysis products or camalexin. The results suggest that the iGS hydrolysis pathway plays an inhibitory role on transformation efficiency in Arabidopsis seedlings at the early infection stage. Later in the Agrobacterium infection process, the accumulation of camalexin is a key factor inhibiting tumour development on Arabidopsis inflorescence stalks. In conclusion, this study reveals the differential roles of GSs and camalexin at different stages of Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation and provides new insights into crown gall disease control and improvement of plant transformation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6638096/ /pubmed/29498790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12672 Text en © 2018 THE AUTHORS. MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY PUBLISHED BY BRITISH SOCIETY FOR PLANT PATHOLOGY AND JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Shih, Po‐Yuan
Chou, Shu‐Jen
Müller, Caroline
Halkier, Barbara Ann
Deeken, Rosalia
Lai, Erh‐Min
Differential roles of glucosinolates and camalexin at different stages of Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation
title Differential roles of glucosinolates and camalexin at different stages of Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation
title_full Differential roles of glucosinolates and camalexin at different stages of Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation
title_fullStr Differential roles of glucosinolates and camalexin at different stages of Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation
title_full_unstemmed Differential roles of glucosinolates and camalexin at different stages of Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation
title_short Differential roles of glucosinolates and camalexin at different stages of Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation
title_sort differential roles of glucosinolates and camalexin at different stages of agrobacterium‐mediated transformation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6638096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29498790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12672
work_keys_str_mv AT shihpoyuan differentialrolesofglucosinolatesandcamalexinatdifferentstagesofagrobacteriummediatedtransformation
AT choushujen differentialrolesofglucosinolatesandcamalexinatdifferentstagesofagrobacteriummediatedtransformation
AT mullercaroline differentialrolesofglucosinolatesandcamalexinatdifferentstagesofagrobacteriummediatedtransformation
AT halkierbarbaraann differentialrolesofglucosinolatesandcamalexinatdifferentstagesofagrobacteriummediatedtransformation
AT deekenrosalia differentialrolesofglucosinolatesandcamalexinatdifferentstagesofagrobacteriummediatedtransformation
AT laierhmin differentialrolesofglucosinolatesandcamalexinatdifferentstagesofagrobacteriummediatedtransformation