Cargando…

Comparative Efficacy of Therapeutics for Chronic Cancer Pain: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE: Opioids are the primary choice for managing chronic cancer pain. However, many nonopioid therapies are currently prescribed for chronic cancer pain with little published evidence comparing their efficacy. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Rongzhong, Jiang, Lihong, Cao, Yu, Liu, Hongli, Ping, Minsheng, Li, Wei, Xu, Yu, Ning, Jie, Chen, Yuqing, Wang, Xiaojing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6638598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30939089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.01567
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Opioids are the primary choice for managing chronic cancer pain. However, many nonopioid therapies are currently prescribed for chronic cancer pain with little published evidence comparing their efficacy. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any systemic pharmaceutical intervention and/or combination thereof in treating chronic cancer pain. The primary outcome was global efficacy reported as an odds ratio (OR). The secondary outcome was change in pain intensity reported as a standardized mean difference (SMD). RESULTS: We included 81 RCTs consisting of 10,003 patients investigating 11 medication classes. Most RCTs (80%) displayed low risk of bias. The top-ranking classes for global efficacy were nonopioid analgesics (network OR, 0.30; 95% credibility interval [CrI], 0.13 to 0.67), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (network OR, 0.44; 95% CrI, 0.22 to 0.90), and opioids (network OR, 0.49; 95% CrI, 0.27 to 0.86), whereas the top-ranked interventions were lidocaine (network OR, 0.04; 95% CrI, 0.01 to 0.18; surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis [SUCRA] score, 98.1), codeine plus aspirin (network OR, 0.22; 95% CrI, 0.08 to 0.63; SUCRA score, 81.1), and pregabalin (network OR, 0.29; 95% CrI, 0.08 to 0.92; SUCRA score, 73.8). In terms of reducing pain intensity, we found that no class was superior to placebo, whereas the following top-ranked interventions were superior to placebo: ziconotide (network SMD, −24.98; 95% CrI, −32.62 to −17.35; SUCRA score, 99.8), dezocine (network SMD, −13.56; 95% CrI, −23.37 to −3.69; SUCRA score, 93.5), and diclofenac (network SMD, −11.22; 95% CrI, −15.91 to −5.80; SUCRA score, 92.9). CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in efficacy among current regimens for chronic cancer pain. Our evidence suggests that certain nonopioid analgesics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can serve as effectively as opioids in managing chronic cancer pain.