Cargando…
Comparative Efficacy of Therapeutics for Chronic Cancer Pain: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE: Opioids are the primary choice for managing chronic cancer pain. However, many nonopioid therapies are currently prescribed for chronic cancer pain with little published evidence comparing their efficacy. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society of Clinical Oncology
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6638598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30939089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.01567 |
_version_ | 1783436363043962880 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Rongzhong Jiang, Lihong Cao, Yu Liu, Hongli Ping, Minsheng Li, Wei Xu, Yu Ning, Jie Chen, Yuqing Wang, Xiaojing |
author_facet | Huang, Rongzhong Jiang, Lihong Cao, Yu Liu, Hongli Ping, Minsheng Li, Wei Xu, Yu Ning, Jie Chen, Yuqing Wang, Xiaojing |
author_sort | Huang, Rongzhong |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Opioids are the primary choice for managing chronic cancer pain. However, many nonopioid therapies are currently prescribed for chronic cancer pain with little published evidence comparing their efficacy. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any systemic pharmaceutical intervention and/or combination thereof in treating chronic cancer pain. The primary outcome was global efficacy reported as an odds ratio (OR). The secondary outcome was change in pain intensity reported as a standardized mean difference (SMD). RESULTS: We included 81 RCTs consisting of 10,003 patients investigating 11 medication classes. Most RCTs (80%) displayed low risk of bias. The top-ranking classes for global efficacy were nonopioid analgesics (network OR, 0.30; 95% credibility interval [CrI], 0.13 to 0.67), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (network OR, 0.44; 95% CrI, 0.22 to 0.90), and opioids (network OR, 0.49; 95% CrI, 0.27 to 0.86), whereas the top-ranked interventions were lidocaine (network OR, 0.04; 95% CrI, 0.01 to 0.18; surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis [SUCRA] score, 98.1), codeine plus aspirin (network OR, 0.22; 95% CrI, 0.08 to 0.63; SUCRA score, 81.1), and pregabalin (network OR, 0.29; 95% CrI, 0.08 to 0.92; SUCRA score, 73.8). In terms of reducing pain intensity, we found that no class was superior to placebo, whereas the following top-ranked interventions were superior to placebo: ziconotide (network SMD, −24.98; 95% CrI, −32.62 to −17.35; SUCRA score, 99.8), dezocine (network SMD, −13.56; 95% CrI, −23.37 to −3.69; SUCRA score, 93.5), and diclofenac (network SMD, −11.22; 95% CrI, −15.91 to −5.80; SUCRA score, 92.9). CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in efficacy among current regimens for chronic cancer pain. Our evidence suggests that certain nonopioid analgesics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can serve as effectively as opioids in managing chronic cancer pain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6638598 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | American Society of Clinical Oncology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66385982020-07-10 Comparative Efficacy of Therapeutics for Chronic Cancer Pain: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis Huang, Rongzhong Jiang, Lihong Cao, Yu Liu, Hongli Ping, Minsheng Li, Wei Xu, Yu Ning, Jie Chen, Yuqing Wang, Xiaojing J Clin Oncol Review Article PURPOSE: Opioids are the primary choice for managing chronic cancer pain. However, many nonopioid therapies are currently prescribed for chronic cancer pain with little published evidence comparing their efficacy. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any systemic pharmaceutical intervention and/or combination thereof in treating chronic cancer pain. The primary outcome was global efficacy reported as an odds ratio (OR). The secondary outcome was change in pain intensity reported as a standardized mean difference (SMD). RESULTS: We included 81 RCTs consisting of 10,003 patients investigating 11 medication classes. Most RCTs (80%) displayed low risk of bias. The top-ranking classes for global efficacy were nonopioid analgesics (network OR, 0.30; 95% credibility interval [CrI], 0.13 to 0.67), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (network OR, 0.44; 95% CrI, 0.22 to 0.90), and opioids (network OR, 0.49; 95% CrI, 0.27 to 0.86), whereas the top-ranked interventions were lidocaine (network OR, 0.04; 95% CrI, 0.01 to 0.18; surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis [SUCRA] score, 98.1), codeine plus aspirin (network OR, 0.22; 95% CrI, 0.08 to 0.63; SUCRA score, 81.1), and pregabalin (network OR, 0.29; 95% CrI, 0.08 to 0.92; SUCRA score, 73.8). In terms of reducing pain intensity, we found that no class was superior to placebo, whereas the following top-ranked interventions were superior to placebo: ziconotide (network SMD, −24.98; 95% CrI, −32.62 to −17.35; SUCRA score, 99.8), dezocine (network SMD, −13.56; 95% CrI, −23.37 to −3.69; SUCRA score, 93.5), and diclofenac (network SMD, −11.22; 95% CrI, −15.91 to −5.80; SUCRA score, 92.9). CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in efficacy among current regimens for chronic cancer pain. Our evidence suggests that certain nonopioid analgesics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can serve as effectively as opioids in managing chronic cancer pain. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2019-07-10 2019-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6638598/ /pubmed/30939089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.01567 Text en © 2019 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Review Article Huang, Rongzhong Jiang, Lihong Cao, Yu Liu, Hongli Ping, Minsheng Li, Wei Xu, Yu Ning, Jie Chen, Yuqing Wang, Xiaojing Comparative Efficacy of Therapeutics for Chronic Cancer Pain: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis |
title | Comparative Efficacy of Therapeutics for Chronic Cancer Pain: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Comparative Efficacy of Therapeutics for Chronic Cancer Pain: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparative Efficacy of Therapeutics for Chronic Cancer Pain: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Efficacy of Therapeutics for Chronic Cancer Pain: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Comparative Efficacy of Therapeutics for Chronic Cancer Pain: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | comparative efficacy of therapeutics for chronic cancer pain: a bayesian network meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6638598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30939089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.01567 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangrongzhong comparativeefficacyoftherapeuticsforchroniccancerpainabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT jianglihong comparativeefficacyoftherapeuticsforchroniccancerpainabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT caoyu comparativeefficacyoftherapeuticsforchroniccancerpainabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT liuhongli comparativeefficacyoftherapeuticsforchroniccancerpainabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT pingminsheng comparativeefficacyoftherapeuticsforchroniccancerpainabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT liwei comparativeefficacyoftherapeuticsforchroniccancerpainabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT xuyu comparativeefficacyoftherapeuticsforchroniccancerpainabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT ningjie comparativeefficacyoftherapeuticsforchroniccancerpainabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT chenyuqing comparativeefficacyoftherapeuticsforchroniccancerpainabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT wangxiaojing comparativeefficacyoftherapeuticsforchroniccancerpainabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis |