Cargando…
Bone regeneration in Ds-Red pig calvarial defect using allogenic transplantation of EGFP-pMSCs – A comparison of host cells and seeding cells in the scaffold
BACKGROUND: Cells, scaffolds, and factors are the triad of regenerative engineering; however, it is difficult to distinguish whether cells in the regenerative construct are from the seeded cells or host cells via the host blood supply. We performed a novel in vivo study to transplant enhanced green...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6638893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31318872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215499 |
_version_ | 1783436373896724480 |
---|---|
author | Hsieh, Ming-Kai Wu, Chia-Jung Su, Xuan-Chun Chen, Yi-Chen Tsai, Tsung-Ting Niu, Chi-Chien Lai, Po-Liang Wu, Shinn-Chih |
author_facet | Hsieh, Ming-Kai Wu, Chia-Jung Su, Xuan-Chun Chen, Yi-Chen Tsai, Tsung-Ting Niu, Chi-Chien Lai, Po-Liang Wu, Shinn-Chih |
author_sort | Hsieh, Ming-Kai |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cells, scaffolds, and factors are the triad of regenerative engineering; however, it is difficult to distinguish whether cells in the regenerative construct are from the seeded cells or host cells via the host blood supply. We performed a novel in vivo study to transplant enhanced green fluorescent pig mesenchymal stem cells (EGFP-pMSCs) into calvarial defect of DsRed pigs. The cell distribution and proportion were distinguished by the different fluorescent colors through the whole regenerative period. METHOD/RESULTS: Eight adult domestic Ds-Red pigs were treated with five modalities: empty defects without scaffold (group 1); defects filled only with scaffold (group 2); defects filled with osteoinduction medium-loaded scaffold (group 3); defects filled with 5 x 10(3) cells/scaffold (group 4); and defects filled with 5 x 10(4) cells/scaffold (group 5). The in vitro cell distribution, morphology, osteogenic differentiation, and fluorescence images of groups 4 and 5 were analyzed. Two animals were sacrificed at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks after transplantation. The in vivo fluorescence imaging and quantification data showed that EGFP-pMSCs were represented in the scaffolds in groups 4 and 5 throughout the whole regenerative period. A higher seeded cell density resulted in more sustained seeded cells in bone regeneration compared to a lower seeded cell density. Host cells were recruited by seeded cells if enough space was available in the scaffold. Host cells in groups 1 to 3 did not change from the 1st week to 4th week, which indicates that the scaffold without seeded cells cannot recruit host cells even when enough space is available for cell ingrowth. The histological and immunohistochemical data showed that more cells were involved in osteogenesis in scaffolds with seeded cells. CONCLUSION: Our in vivo results showed that more seeded cells recruit more host cells and that both cell types participate in osteogenesis. These results suggest that scaffolds without seeded cells may not be effective in bone transplantation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6638893 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66388932019-07-25 Bone regeneration in Ds-Red pig calvarial defect using allogenic transplantation of EGFP-pMSCs – A comparison of host cells and seeding cells in the scaffold Hsieh, Ming-Kai Wu, Chia-Jung Su, Xuan-Chun Chen, Yi-Chen Tsai, Tsung-Ting Niu, Chi-Chien Lai, Po-Liang Wu, Shinn-Chih PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Cells, scaffolds, and factors are the triad of regenerative engineering; however, it is difficult to distinguish whether cells in the regenerative construct are from the seeded cells or host cells via the host blood supply. We performed a novel in vivo study to transplant enhanced green fluorescent pig mesenchymal stem cells (EGFP-pMSCs) into calvarial defect of DsRed pigs. The cell distribution and proportion were distinguished by the different fluorescent colors through the whole regenerative period. METHOD/RESULTS: Eight adult domestic Ds-Red pigs were treated with five modalities: empty defects without scaffold (group 1); defects filled only with scaffold (group 2); defects filled with osteoinduction medium-loaded scaffold (group 3); defects filled with 5 x 10(3) cells/scaffold (group 4); and defects filled with 5 x 10(4) cells/scaffold (group 5). The in vitro cell distribution, morphology, osteogenic differentiation, and fluorescence images of groups 4 and 5 were analyzed. Two animals were sacrificed at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks after transplantation. The in vivo fluorescence imaging and quantification data showed that EGFP-pMSCs were represented in the scaffolds in groups 4 and 5 throughout the whole regenerative period. A higher seeded cell density resulted in more sustained seeded cells in bone regeneration compared to a lower seeded cell density. Host cells were recruited by seeded cells if enough space was available in the scaffold. Host cells in groups 1 to 3 did not change from the 1st week to 4th week, which indicates that the scaffold without seeded cells cannot recruit host cells even when enough space is available for cell ingrowth. The histological and immunohistochemical data showed that more cells were involved in osteogenesis in scaffolds with seeded cells. CONCLUSION: Our in vivo results showed that more seeded cells recruit more host cells and that both cell types participate in osteogenesis. These results suggest that scaffolds without seeded cells may not be effective in bone transplantation. Public Library of Science 2019-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6638893/ /pubmed/31318872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215499 Text en © 2019 Hsieh et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hsieh, Ming-Kai Wu, Chia-Jung Su, Xuan-Chun Chen, Yi-Chen Tsai, Tsung-Ting Niu, Chi-Chien Lai, Po-Liang Wu, Shinn-Chih Bone regeneration in Ds-Red pig calvarial defect using allogenic transplantation of EGFP-pMSCs – A comparison of host cells and seeding cells in the scaffold |
title | Bone regeneration in Ds-Red pig calvarial defect using allogenic transplantation of EGFP-pMSCs – A comparison of host cells and seeding cells in the scaffold |
title_full | Bone regeneration in Ds-Red pig calvarial defect using allogenic transplantation of EGFP-pMSCs – A comparison of host cells and seeding cells in the scaffold |
title_fullStr | Bone regeneration in Ds-Red pig calvarial defect using allogenic transplantation of EGFP-pMSCs – A comparison of host cells and seeding cells in the scaffold |
title_full_unstemmed | Bone regeneration in Ds-Red pig calvarial defect using allogenic transplantation of EGFP-pMSCs – A comparison of host cells and seeding cells in the scaffold |
title_short | Bone regeneration in Ds-Red pig calvarial defect using allogenic transplantation of EGFP-pMSCs – A comparison of host cells and seeding cells in the scaffold |
title_sort | bone regeneration in ds-red pig calvarial defect using allogenic transplantation of egfp-pmscs – a comparison of host cells and seeding cells in the scaffold |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6638893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31318872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215499 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hsiehmingkai boneregenerationindsredpigcalvarialdefectusingallogenictransplantationofegfppmscsacomparisonofhostcellsandseedingcellsinthescaffold AT wuchiajung boneregenerationindsredpigcalvarialdefectusingallogenictransplantationofegfppmscsacomparisonofhostcellsandseedingcellsinthescaffold AT suxuanchun boneregenerationindsredpigcalvarialdefectusingallogenictransplantationofegfppmscsacomparisonofhostcellsandseedingcellsinthescaffold AT chenyichen boneregenerationindsredpigcalvarialdefectusingallogenictransplantationofegfppmscsacomparisonofhostcellsandseedingcellsinthescaffold AT tsaitsungting boneregenerationindsredpigcalvarialdefectusingallogenictransplantationofegfppmscsacomparisonofhostcellsandseedingcellsinthescaffold AT niuchichien boneregenerationindsredpigcalvarialdefectusingallogenictransplantationofegfppmscsacomparisonofhostcellsandseedingcellsinthescaffold AT laipoliang boneregenerationindsredpigcalvarialdefectusingallogenictransplantationofegfppmscsacomparisonofhostcellsandseedingcellsinthescaffold AT wushinnchih boneregenerationindsredpigcalvarialdefectusingallogenictransplantationofegfppmscsacomparisonofhostcellsandseedingcellsinthescaffold |