Cargando…

Bone regeneration in Ds-Red pig calvarial defect using allogenic transplantation of EGFP-pMSCs – A comparison of host cells and seeding cells in the scaffold

BACKGROUND: Cells, scaffolds, and factors are the triad of regenerative engineering; however, it is difficult to distinguish whether cells in the regenerative construct are from the seeded cells or host cells via the host blood supply. We performed a novel in vivo study to transplant enhanced green...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsieh, Ming-Kai, Wu, Chia-Jung, Su, Xuan-Chun, Chen, Yi-Chen, Tsai, Tsung-Ting, Niu, Chi-Chien, Lai, Po-Liang, Wu, Shinn-Chih
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6638893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31318872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215499
_version_ 1783436373896724480
author Hsieh, Ming-Kai
Wu, Chia-Jung
Su, Xuan-Chun
Chen, Yi-Chen
Tsai, Tsung-Ting
Niu, Chi-Chien
Lai, Po-Liang
Wu, Shinn-Chih
author_facet Hsieh, Ming-Kai
Wu, Chia-Jung
Su, Xuan-Chun
Chen, Yi-Chen
Tsai, Tsung-Ting
Niu, Chi-Chien
Lai, Po-Liang
Wu, Shinn-Chih
author_sort Hsieh, Ming-Kai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cells, scaffolds, and factors are the triad of regenerative engineering; however, it is difficult to distinguish whether cells in the regenerative construct are from the seeded cells or host cells via the host blood supply. We performed a novel in vivo study to transplant enhanced green fluorescent pig mesenchymal stem cells (EGFP-pMSCs) into calvarial defect of DsRed pigs. The cell distribution and proportion were distinguished by the different fluorescent colors through the whole regenerative period. METHOD/RESULTS: Eight adult domestic Ds-Red pigs were treated with five modalities: empty defects without scaffold (group 1); defects filled only with scaffold (group 2); defects filled with osteoinduction medium-loaded scaffold (group 3); defects filled with 5 x 10(3) cells/scaffold (group 4); and defects filled with 5 x 10(4) cells/scaffold (group 5). The in vitro cell distribution, morphology, osteogenic differentiation, and fluorescence images of groups 4 and 5 were analyzed. Two animals were sacrificed at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks after transplantation. The in vivo fluorescence imaging and quantification data showed that EGFP-pMSCs were represented in the scaffolds in groups 4 and 5 throughout the whole regenerative period. A higher seeded cell density resulted in more sustained seeded cells in bone regeneration compared to a lower seeded cell density. Host cells were recruited by seeded cells if enough space was available in the scaffold. Host cells in groups 1 to 3 did not change from the 1st week to 4th week, which indicates that the scaffold without seeded cells cannot recruit host cells even when enough space is available for cell ingrowth. The histological and immunohistochemical data showed that more cells were involved in osteogenesis in scaffolds with seeded cells. CONCLUSION: Our in vivo results showed that more seeded cells recruit more host cells and that both cell types participate in osteogenesis. These results suggest that scaffolds without seeded cells may not be effective in bone transplantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6638893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66388932019-07-25 Bone regeneration in Ds-Red pig calvarial defect using allogenic transplantation of EGFP-pMSCs – A comparison of host cells and seeding cells in the scaffold Hsieh, Ming-Kai Wu, Chia-Jung Su, Xuan-Chun Chen, Yi-Chen Tsai, Tsung-Ting Niu, Chi-Chien Lai, Po-Liang Wu, Shinn-Chih PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Cells, scaffolds, and factors are the triad of regenerative engineering; however, it is difficult to distinguish whether cells in the regenerative construct are from the seeded cells or host cells via the host blood supply. We performed a novel in vivo study to transplant enhanced green fluorescent pig mesenchymal stem cells (EGFP-pMSCs) into calvarial defect of DsRed pigs. The cell distribution and proportion were distinguished by the different fluorescent colors through the whole regenerative period. METHOD/RESULTS: Eight adult domestic Ds-Red pigs were treated with five modalities: empty defects without scaffold (group 1); defects filled only with scaffold (group 2); defects filled with osteoinduction medium-loaded scaffold (group 3); defects filled with 5 x 10(3) cells/scaffold (group 4); and defects filled with 5 x 10(4) cells/scaffold (group 5). The in vitro cell distribution, morphology, osteogenic differentiation, and fluorescence images of groups 4 and 5 were analyzed. Two animals were sacrificed at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks after transplantation. The in vivo fluorescence imaging and quantification data showed that EGFP-pMSCs were represented in the scaffolds in groups 4 and 5 throughout the whole regenerative period. A higher seeded cell density resulted in more sustained seeded cells in bone regeneration compared to a lower seeded cell density. Host cells were recruited by seeded cells if enough space was available in the scaffold. Host cells in groups 1 to 3 did not change from the 1st week to 4th week, which indicates that the scaffold without seeded cells cannot recruit host cells even when enough space is available for cell ingrowth. The histological and immunohistochemical data showed that more cells were involved in osteogenesis in scaffolds with seeded cells. CONCLUSION: Our in vivo results showed that more seeded cells recruit more host cells and that both cell types participate in osteogenesis. These results suggest that scaffolds without seeded cells may not be effective in bone transplantation. Public Library of Science 2019-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6638893/ /pubmed/31318872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215499 Text en © 2019 Hsieh et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hsieh, Ming-Kai
Wu, Chia-Jung
Su, Xuan-Chun
Chen, Yi-Chen
Tsai, Tsung-Ting
Niu, Chi-Chien
Lai, Po-Liang
Wu, Shinn-Chih
Bone regeneration in Ds-Red pig calvarial defect using allogenic transplantation of EGFP-pMSCs – A comparison of host cells and seeding cells in the scaffold
title Bone regeneration in Ds-Red pig calvarial defect using allogenic transplantation of EGFP-pMSCs – A comparison of host cells and seeding cells in the scaffold
title_full Bone regeneration in Ds-Red pig calvarial defect using allogenic transplantation of EGFP-pMSCs – A comparison of host cells and seeding cells in the scaffold
title_fullStr Bone regeneration in Ds-Red pig calvarial defect using allogenic transplantation of EGFP-pMSCs – A comparison of host cells and seeding cells in the scaffold
title_full_unstemmed Bone regeneration in Ds-Red pig calvarial defect using allogenic transplantation of EGFP-pMSCs – A comparison of host cells and seeding cells in the scaffold
title_short Bone regeneration in Ds-Red pig calvarial defect using allogenic transplantation of EGFP-pMSCs – A comparison of host cells and seeding cells in the scaffold
title_sort bone regeneration in ds-red pig calvarial defect using allogenic transplantation of egfp-pmscs – a comparison of host cells and seeding cells in the scaffold
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6638893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31318872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215499
work_keys_str_mv AT hsiehmingkai boneregenerationindsredpigcalvarialdefectusingallogenictransplantationofegfppmscsacomparisonofhostcellsandseedingcellsinthescaffold
AT wuchiajung boneregenerationindsredpigcalvarialdefectusingallogenictransplantationofegfppmscsacomparisonofhostcellsandseedingcellsinthescaffold
AT suxuanchun boneregenerationindsredpigcalvarialdefectusingallogenictransplantationofegfppmscsacomparisonofhostcellsandseedingcellsinthescaffold
AT chenyichen boneregenerationindsredpigcalvarialdefectusingallogenictransplantationofegfppmscsacomparisonofhostcellsandseedingcellsinthescaffold
AT tsaitsungting boneregenerationindsredpigcalvarialdefectusingallogenictransplantationofegfppmscsacomparisonofhostcellsandseedingcellsinthescaffold
AT niuchichien boneregenerationindsredpigcalvarialdefectusingallogenictransplantationofegfppmscsacomparisonofhostcellsandseedingcellsinthescaffold
AT laipoliang boneregenerationindsredpigcalvarialdefectusingallogenictransplantationofegfppmscsacomparisonofhostcellsandseedingcellsinthescaffold
AT wushinnchih boneregenerationindsredpigcalvarialdefectusingallogenictransplantationofegfppmscsacomparisonofhostcellsandseedingcellsinthescaffold