Cargando…

Evaluation of the Pint of Science festival in Thailand

BACKGROUND: The Pint of Science festival is the biggest annual international science festival. In May 2017, we coordinated the first Pint of Science festival in Thailand and reported our initial reflections. Building on this work, we set out to evaluate more systematically events conducted in 2018....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adhikari, Bipin, Hlaing, Phyu Hnin, Robinson, Matthew T., Ruecker, Andrea, Tan, Noel Hidalgo, Jatupornpimol, Nattapat, Chanviriyavuth, Rita, Cheah, Phaik Yeong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6638989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31318964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219983
_version_ 1783436391188791296
author Adhikari, Bipin
Hlaing, Phyu Hnin
Robinson, Matthew T.
Ruecker, Andrea
Tan, Noel Hidalgo
Jatupornpimol, Nattapat
Chanviriyavuth, Rita
Cheah, Phaik Yeong
author_facet Adhikari, Bipin
Hlaing, Phyu Hnin
Robinson, Matthew T.
Ruecker, Andrea
Tan, Noel Hidalgo
Jatupornpimol, Nattapat
Chanviriyavuth, Rita
Cheah, Phaik Yeong
author_sort Adhikari, Bipin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Pint of Science festival is the biggest annual international science festival. In May 2017, we coordinated the first Pint of Science festival in Thailand and reported our initial reflections. Building on this work, we set out to evaluate more systematically events conducted in 2018. METHODS: In 2018, we conducted Pint of Science events at four different locations in Bangkok. Overall, there were 18 talks held over six event-days in 2018. We administered 180 self-reported questionnaires as well as conducted 11 semi-structured interviews and a focus group discussion with audience members and speakers. RESULTS: Of the 180 questionnaires handed out, 125 attendees completed the questionnaire. The majority of attendees came because they were interested in science (68.0%), to learn something new (46.4%) and to enjoy themselves (44.8%). Our qualitative results confirm the quantitative findings. In addition, speakers viewed that they benefited by improving their communication skills and having the opportunity to network with scientists and non-scientists. Speakers also mentioned that such events were a good means to engage with the public, can improve the visibility of their work and potentially attract more funding. To improve the Pint of Science activities, audience members suggested to include a more diverse range of topics, more collaborations with other local research institutions and to hold the event at larger venues. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that Pint of Science was well received in Bangkok with recommendations to improve minor issues related to practicalities and logistics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6638989
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66389892019-07-25 Evaluation of the Pint of Science festival in Thailand Adhikari, Bipin Hlaing, Phyu Hnin Robinson, Matthew T. Ruecker, Andrea Tan, Noel Hidalgo Jatupornpimol, Nattapat Chanviriyavuth, Rita Cheah, Phaik Yeong PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The Pint of Science festival is the biggest annual international science festival. In May 2017, we coordinated the first Pint of Science festival in Thailand and reported our initial reflections. Building on this work, we set out to evaluate more systematically events conducted in 2018. METHODS: In 2018, we conducted Pint of Science events at four different locations in Bangkok. Overall, there were 18 talks held over six event-days in 2018. We administered 180 self-reported questionnaires as well as conducted 11 semi-structured interviews and a focus group discussion with audience members and speakers. RESULTS: Of the 180 questionnaires handed out, 125 attendees completed the questionnaire. The majority of attendees came because they were interested in science (68.0%), to learn something new (46.4%) and to enjoy themselves (44.8%). Our qualitative results confirm the quantitative findings. In addition, speakers viewed that they benefited by improving their communication skills and having the opportunity to network with scientists and non-scientists. Speakers also mentioned that such events were a good means to engage with the public, can improve the visibility of their work and potentially attract more funding. To improve the Pint of Science activities, audience members suggested to include a more diverse range of topics, more collaborations with other local research institutions and to hold the event at larger venues. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that Pint of Science was well received in Bangkok with recommendations to improve minor issues related to practicalities and logistics. Public Library of Science 2019-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6638989/ /pubmed/31318964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219983 Text en © 2019 Adhikari et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Adhikari, Bipin
Hlaing, Phyu Hnin
Robinson, Matthew T.
Ruecker, Andrea
Tan, Noel Hidalgo
Jatupornpimol, Nattapat
Chanviriyavuth, Rita
Cheah, Phaik Yeong
Evaluation of the Pint of Science festival in Thailand
title Evaluation of the Pint of Science festival in Thailand
title_full Evaluation of the Pint of Science festival in Thailand
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Pint of Science festival in Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Pint of Science festival in Thailand
title_short Evaluation of the Pint of Science festival in Thailand
title_sort evaluation of the pint of science festival in thailand
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6638989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31318964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219983
work_keys_str_mv AT adhikaribipin evaluationofthepintofsciencefestivalinthailand
AT hlaingphyuhnin evaluationofthepintofsciencefestivalinthailand
AT robinsonmatthewt evaluationofthepintofsciencefestivalinthailand
AT rueckerandrea evaluationofthepintofsciencefestivalinthailand
AT tannoelhidalgo evaluationofthepintofsciencefestivalinthailand
AT jatupornpimolnattapat evaluationofthepintofsciencefestivalinthailand
AT chanviriyavuthrita evaluationofthepintofsciencefestivalinthailand
AT cheahphaikyeong evaluationofthepintofsciencefestivalinthailand