Cargando…

Differences in Perceptions of Health Information Between the Public and Health Care Professionals: Nonprobability Sampling Questionnaire Survey

BACKGROUND: In the new media age, the public searches for information both online and offline. Many studies have examined how the public reads and understands this information but very few investigate how people assess the quality of journalistic articles as opposed to information generated by healt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gesser-Edelsburg, Anat, Abed Elhadi Shahbari, Nour, Cohen, Ricky, Mir Halavi, Adva, Hijazi, Rana, Paz-Yaakobovitch, Galit, Birman, Yael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6639070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31271145
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14105
_version_ 1783436399142240256
author Gesser-Edelsburg, Anat
Abed Elhadi Shahbari, Nour
Cohen, Ricky
Mir Halavi, Adva
Hijazi, Rana
Paz-Yaakobovitch, Galit
Birman, Yael
author_facet Gesser-Edelsburg, Anat
Abed Elhadi Shahbari, Nour
Cohen, Ricky
Mir Halavi, Adva
Hijazi, Rana
Paz-Yaakobovitch, Galit
Birman, Yael
author_sort Gesser-Edelsburg, Anat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the new media age, the public searches for information both online and offline. Many studies have examined how the public reads and understands this information but very few investigate how people assess the quality of journalistic articles as opposed to information generated by health professionals. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine how public health care workers (HCWs) and the general public seek, read, and understand health information and to investigate the criteria by which they assess the quality of journalistic articles. METHODS: A Web-based nonprobability sampling questionnaire survey was distributed to Israeli HCWs and members of the public via 3 social media outlets: Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram. A total of 979 respondents participated in the online survey via the Qualtrics XM platform. RESULTS: The findings indicate that HCWs find academic articles more reliable than do members of the general public (44.4% and 28.4%, respectively, P<.001). Within each group, we found disparities between the places where people search for information and the sources they consider reliable. HCWs consider academic articles to be the most reliable, yet these are not their main information sources. In addition, HCWs often use social networks to search for information (18.2%, P<.001), despite considering them very unreliable (only 2.2% found them reliable, P<.001). The same paradoxes were found among the general public, where 37.5% (P<.001) seek information via social networks yet only 8.4% (P<.001) find them reliable. Out of 6 quality criteria, 4 were important both to HCWs and to the general public. CONCLUSIONS: In the new media age where information is accessible to all, the quality of articles about health is of critical importance. It is important that the criteria examined in this research become the norm in health writing for all stakeholders who write about health, whether they are professional journalists or citizen journalists writing in the new media.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6639070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66390702019-07-30 Differences in Perceptions of Health Information Between the Public and Health Care Professionals: Nonprobability Sampling Questionnaire Survey Gesser-Edelsburg, Anat Abed Elhadi Shahbari, Nour Cohen, Ricky Mir Halavi, Adva Hijazi, Rana Paz-Yaakobovitch, Galit Birman, Yael J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: In the new media age, the public searches for information both online and offline. Many studies have examined how the public reads and understands this information but very few investigate how people assess the quality of journalistic articles as opposed to information generated by health professionals. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine how public health care workers (HCWs) and the general public seek, read, and understand health information and to investigate the criteria by which they assess the quality of journalistic articles. METHODS: A Web-based nonprobability sampling questionnaire survey was distributed to Israeli HCWs and members of the public via 3 social media outlets: Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram. A total of 979 respondents participated in the online survey via the Qualtrics XM platform. RESULTS: The findings indicate that HCWs find academic articles more reliable than do members of the general public (44.4% and 28.4%, respectively, P<.001). Within each group, we found disparities between the places where people search for information and the sources they consider reliable. HCWs consider academic articles to be the most reliable, yet these are not their main information sources. In addition, HCWs often use social networks to search for information (18.2%, P<.001), despite considering them very unreliable (only 2.2% found them reliable, P<.001). The same paradoxes were found among the general public, where 37.5% (P<.001) seek information via social networks yet only 8.4% (P<.001) find them reliable. Out of 6 quality criteria, 4 were important both to HCWs and to the general public. CONCLUSIONS: In the new media age where information is accessible to all, the quality of articles about health is of critical importance. It is important that the criteria examined in this research become the norm in health writing for all stakeholders who write about health, whether they are professional journalists or citizen journalists writing in the new media. JMIR Publications 2019-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6639070/ /pubmed/31271145 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14105 Text en ©Anat Gesser-Edelsburg, Nour Abed Elhadi Shahbari, Ricky Cohen, Adva Mir Halavi, Rana Hijazi, Galit Paz-Yaakobovitch, Yael Birman. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 03.07.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Gesser-Edelsburg, Anat
Abed Elhadi Shahbari, Nour
Cohen, Ricky
Mir Halavi, Adva
Hijazi, Rana
Paz-Yaakobovitch, Galit
Birman, Yael
Differences in Perceptions of Health Information Between the Public and Health Care Professionals: Nonprobability Sampling Questionnaire Survey
title Differences in Perceptions of Health Information Between the Public and Health Care Professionals: Nonprobability Sampling Questionnaire Survey
title_full Differences in Perceptions of Health Information Between the Public and Health Care Professionals: Nonprobability Sampling Questionnaire Survey
title_fullStr Differences in Perceptions of Health Information Between the Public and Health Care Professionals: Nonprobability Sampling Questionnaire Survey
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Perceptions of Health Information Between the Public and Health Care Professionals: Nonprobability Sampling Questionnaire Survey
title_short Differences in Perceptions of Health Information Between the Public and Health Care Professionals: Nonprobability Sampling Questionnaire Survey
title_sort differences in perceptions of health information between the public and health care professionals: nonprobability sampling questionnaire survey
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6639070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31271145
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14105
work_keys_str_mv AT gesseredelsburganat differencesinperceptionsofhealthinformationbetweenthepublicandhealthcareprofessionalsnonprobabilitysamplingquestionnairesurvey
AT abedelhadishahbarinour differencesinperceptionsofhealthinformationbetweenthepublicandhealthcareprofessionalsnonprobabilitysamplingquestionnairesurvey
AT cohenricky differencesinperceptionsofhealthinformationbetweenthepublicandhealthcareprofessionalsnonprobabilitysamplingquestionnairesurvey
AT mirhalaviadva differencesinperceptionsofhealthinformationbetweenthepublicandhealthcareprofessionalsnonprobabilitysamplingquestionnairesurvey
AT hijazirana differencesinperceptionsofhealthinformationbetweenthepublicandhealthcareprofessionalsnonprobabilitysamplingquestionnairesurvey
AT pazyaakobovitchgalit differencesinperceptionsofhealthinformationbetweenthepublicandhealthcareprofessionalsnonprobabilitysamplingquestionnairesurvey
AT birmanyael differencesinperceptionsofhealthinformationbetweenthepublicandhealthcareprofessionalsnonprobabilitysamplingquestionnairesurvey