Cargando…
Differences in Perceptions of Health Information Between the Public and Health Care Professionals: Nonprobability Sampling Questionnaire Survey
BACKGROUND: In the new media age, the public searches for information both online and offline. Many studies have examined how the public reads and understands this information but very few investigate how people assess the quality of journalistic articles as opposed to information generated by healt...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6639070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31271145 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14105 |
_version_ | 1783436399142240256 |
---|---|
author | Gesser-Edelsburg, Anat Abed Elhadi Shahbari, Nour Cohen, Ricky Mir Halavi, Adva Hijazi, Rana Paz-Yaakobovitch, Galit Birman, Yael |
author_facet | Gesser-Edelsburg, Anat Abed Elhadi Shahbari, Nour Cohen, Ricky Mir Halavi, Adva Hijazi, Rana Paz-Yaakobovitch, Galit Birman, Yael |
author_sort | Gesser-Edelsburg, Anat |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the new media age, the public searches for information both online and offline. Many studies have examined how the public reads and understands this information but very few investigate how people assess the quality of journalistic articles as opposed to information generated by health professionals. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine how public health care workers (HCWs) and the general public seek, read, and understand health information and to investigate the criteria by which they assess the quality of journalistic articles. METHODS: A Web-based nonprobability sampling questionnaire survey was distributed to Israeli HCWs and members of the public via 3 social media outlets: Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram. A total of 979 respondents participated in the online survey via the Qualtrics XM platform. RESULTS: The findings indicate that HCWs find academic articles more reliable than do members of the general public (44.4% and 28.4%, respectively, P<.001). Within each group, we found disparities between the places where people search for information and the sources they consider reliable. HCWs consider academic articles to be the most reliable, yet these are not their main information sources. In addition, HCWs often use social networks to search for information (18.2%, P<.001), despite considering them very unreliable (only 2.2% found them reliable, P<.001). The same paradoxes were found among the general public, where 37.5% (P<.001) seek information via social networks yet only 8.4% (P<.001) find them reliable. Out of 6 quality criteria, 4 were important both to HCWs and to the general public. CONCLUSIONS: In the new media age where information is accessible to all, the quality of articles about health is of critical importance. It is important that the criteria examined in this research become the norm in health writing for all stakeholders who write about health, whether they are professional journalists or citizen journalists writing in the new media. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6639070 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66390702019-07-30 Differences in Perceptions of Health Information Between the Public and Health Care Professionals: Nonprobability Sampling Questionnaire Survey Gesser-Edelsburg, Anat Abed Elhadi Shahbari, Nour Cohen, Ricky Mir Halavi, Adva Hijazi, Rana Paz-Yaakobovitch, Galit Birman, Yael J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: In the new media age, the public searches for information both online and offline. Many studies have examined how the public reads and understands this information but very few investigate how people assess the quality of journalistic articles as opposed to information generated by health professionals. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine how public health care workers (HCWs) and the general public seek, read, and understand health information and to investigate the criteria by which they assess the quality of journalistic articles. METHODS: A Web-based nonprobability sampling questionnaire survey was distributed to Israeli HCWs and members of the public via 3 social media outlets: Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram. A total of 979 respondents participated in the online survey via the Qualtrics XM platform. RESULTS: The findings indicate that HCWs find academic articles more reliable than do members of the general public (44.4% and 28.4%, respectively, P<.001). Within each group, we found disparities between the places where people search for information and the sources they consider reliable. HCWs consider academic articles to be the most reliable, yet these are not their main information sources. In addition, HCWs often use social networks to search for information (18.2%, P<.001), despite considering them very unreliable (only 2.2% found them reliable, P<.001). The same paradoxes were found among the general public, where 37.5% (P<.001) seek information via social networks yet only 8.4% (P<.001) find them reliable. Out of 6 quality criteria, 4 were important both to HCWs and to the general public. CONCLUSIONS: In the new media age where information is accessible to all, the quality of articles about health is of critical importance. It is important that the criteria examined in this research become the norm in health writing for all stakeholders who write about health, whether they are professional journalists or citizen journalists writing in the new media. JMIR Publications 2019-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6639070/ /pubmed/31271145 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14105 Text en ©Anat Gesser-Edelsburg, Nour Abed Elhadi Shahbari, Ricky Cohen, Adva Mir Halavi, Rana Hijazi, Galit Paz-Yaakobovitch, Yael Birman. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 03.07.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Gesser-Edelsburg, Anat Abed Elhadi Shahbari, Nour Cohen, Ricky Mir Halavi, Adva Hijazi, Rana Paz-Yaakobovitch, Galit Birman, Yael Differences in Perceptions of Health Information Between the Public and Health Care Professionals: Nonprobability Sampling Questionnaire Survey |
title | Differences in Perceptions of Health Information Between the Public and Health Care Professionals: Nonprobability Sampling Questionnaire Survey |
title_full | Differences in Perceptions of Health Information Between the Public and Health Care Professionals: Nonprobability Sampling Questionnaire Survey |
title_fullStr | Differences in Perceptions of Health Information Between the Public and Health Care Professionals: Nonprobability Sampling Questionnaire Survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in Perceptions of Health Information Between the Public and Health Care Professionals: Nonprobability Sampling Questionnaire Survey |
title_short | Differences in Perceptions of Health Information Between the Public and Health Care Professionals: Nonprobability Sampling Questionnaire Survey |
title_sort | differences in perceptions of health information between the public and health care professionals: nonprobability sampling questionnaire survey |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6639070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31271145 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gesseredelsburganat differencesinperceptionsofhealthinformationbetweenthepublicandhealthcareprofessionalsnonprobabilitysamplingquestionnairesurvey AT abedelhadishahbarinour differencesinperceptionsofhealthinformationbetweenthepublicandhealthcareprofessionalsnonprobabilitysamplingquestionnairesurvey AT cohenricky differencesinperceptionsofhealthinformationbetweenthepublicandhealthcareprofessionalsnonprobabilitysamplingquestionnairesurvey AT mirhalaviadva differencesinperceptionsofhealthinformationbetweenthepublicandhealthcareprofessionalsnonprobabilitysamplingquestionnairesurvey AT hijazirana differencesinperceptionsofhealthinformationbetweenthepublicandhealthcareprofessionalsnonprobabilitysamplingquestionnairesurvey AT pazyaakobovitchgalit differencesinperceptionsofhealthinformationbetweenthepublicandhealthcareprofessionalsnonprobabilitysamplingquestionnairesurvey AT birmanyael differencesinperceptionsofhealthinformationbetweenthepublicandhealthcareprofessionalsnonprobabilitysamplingquestionnairesurvey |