Cargando…
The effects of an integrated supportive care intervention on quality of life outcomes in outpatients with breast and gynecologic cancer undergoing chemotherapy: Results from a randomized controlled trial
The aim of the Complementary Nursing in Gynecologic Oncology study was to investigate the effects of a complex, nurse‐led, supportive care intervention using Complementary and Integrative Medicine (CIM) on patients’ quality of life (QoL) and associated patient‐reported outcomes. In this prospective,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6639168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31115192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2196 |
_version_ | 1783436409234784256 |
---|---|
author | Klafke, Nadja Mahler, Cornelia von Hagens, Cornelia Uhlmann, Lorenz Bentner, Martina Schneeweiss, Andreas Mueller, Andreas Szecsenyi, Joachim Joos, Stefanie |
author_facet | Klafke, Nadja Mahler, Cornelia von Hagens, Cornelia Uhlmann, Lorenz Bentner, Martina Schneeweiss, Andreas Mueller, Andreas Szecsenyi, Joachim Joos, Stefanie |
author_sort | Klafke, Nadja |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of the Complementary Nursing in Gynecologic Oncology study was to investigate the effects of a complex, nurse‐led, supportive care intervention using Complementary and Integrative Medicine (CIM) on patients’ quality of life (QoL) and associated patient‐reported outcomes. In this prospective, pragmatic, bicentric, randomized controlled trial, women with breast or gynecologic cancer undergoing a new regimen of chemotherapy (CHT) were randomly assigned to routine supportive care plus intervention (intervention group, IG) or routine care alone (control group, CG). The intervention consisted of CIM applications and counseling for symptom management, as well as CIM information material. The primary endpoint was global QoL measured with the EORTC‐QLQ‐C30 before and after CHT. Mixed linear models considering fixed and random factors were used to analyze the data. In total, 126 patients were randomly assigned into the IG and 125 patients into the CG (median age 51 years). The patients’ medical and socio‐demographic characteristics were homogenous at baseline and at follow‐up. No group effects on QoL were found upon completion of CHT (estimate −1.04 [−4.89; 2.81]; P = 0.596), but there was a significant group difference in favor of the IG 6 months later (estimate 6.643 [1.65; 11.64]; P = 0.010). IG patients did also experience significant better emotional functioning (P = 0.007) and less fatigue (P = 0.027). The tested supportive intervention did not improve patients’ QoL outcomes directly after CHT (T3), but was associated with significant QoL improvements when considering the change from baseline to the time point T4, which could be assessed 6 months after patients’ completion of CHT. This delayed effect may have resulted due to a strengthening of patients’ self‐management competencies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6639168 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66391682019-07-29 The effects of an integrated supportive care intervention on quality of life outcomes in outpatients with breast and gynecologic cancer undergoing chemotherapy: Results from a randomized controlled trial Klafke, Nadja Mahler, Cornelia von Hagens, Cornelia Uhlmann, Lorenz Bentner, Martina Schneeweiss, Andreas Mueller, Andreas Szecsenyi, Joachim Joos, Stefanie Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research The aim of the Complementary Nursing in Gynecologic Oncology study was to investigate the effects of a complex, nurse‐led, supportive care intervention using Complementary and Integrative Medicine (CIM) on patients’ quality of life (QoL) and associated patient‐reported outcomes. In this prospective, pragmatic, bicentric, randomized controlled trial, women with breast or gynecologic cancer undergoing a new regimen of chemotherapy (CHT) were randomly assigned to routine supportive care plus intervention (intervention group, IG) or routine care alone (control group, CG). The intervention consisted of CIM applications and counseling for symptom management, as well as CIM information material. The primary endpoint was global QoL measured with the EORTC‐QLQ‐C30 before and after CHT. Mixed linear models considering fixed and random factors were used to analyze the data. In total, 126 patients were randomly assigned into the IG and 125 patients into the CG (median age 51 years). The patients’ medical and socio‐demographic characteristics were homogenous at baseline and at follow‐up. No group effects on QoL were found upon completion of CHT (estimate −1.04 [−4.89; 2.81]; P = 0.596), but there was a significant group difference in favor of the IG 6 months later (estimate 6.643 [1.65; 11.64]; P = 0.010). IG patients did also experience significant better emotional functioning (P = 0.007) and less fatigue (P = 0.027). The tested supportive intervention did not improve patients’ QoL outcomes directly after CHT (T3), but was associated with significant QoL improvements when considering the change from baseline to the time point T4, which could be assessed 6 months after patients’ completion of CHT. This delayed effect may have resulted due to a strengthening of patients’ self‐management competencies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6639168/ /pubmed/31115192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2196 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Cancer Research Klafke, Nadja Mahler, Cornelia von Hagens, Cornelia Uhlmann, Lorenz Bentner, Martina Schneeweiss, Andreas Mueller, Andreas Szecsenyi, Joachim Joos, Stefanie The effects of an integrated supportive care intervention on quality of life outcomes in outpatients with breast and gynecologic cancer undergoing chemotherapy: Results from a randomized controlled trial |
title | The effects of an integrated supportive care intervention on quality of life outcomes in outpatients with breast and gynecologic cancer undergoing chemotherapy: Results from a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | The effects of an integrated supportive care intervention on quality of life outcomes in outpatients with breast and gynecologic cancer undergoing chemotherapy: Results from a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The effects of an integrated supportive care intervention on quality of life outcomes in outpatients with breast and gynecologic cancer undergoing chemotherapy: Results from a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The effects of an integrated supportive care intervention on quality of life outcomes in outpatients with breast and gynecologic cancer undergoing chemotherapy: Results from a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | The effects of an integrated supportive care intervention on quality of life outcomes in outpatients with breast and gynecologic cancer undergoing chemotherapy: Results from a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | effects of an integrated supportive care intervention on quality of life outcomes in outpatients with breast and gynecologic cancer undergoing chemotherapy: results from a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Clinical Cancer Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6639168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31115192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2196 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klafkenadja theeffectsofanintegratedsupportivecareinterventiononqualityoflifeoutcomesinoutpatientswithbreastandgynecologiccancerundergoingchemotherapyresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mahlercornelia theeffectsofanintegratedsupportivecareinterventiononqualityoflifeoutcomesinoutpatientswithbreastandgynecologiccancerundergoingchemotherapyresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vonhagenscornelia theeffectsofanintegratedsupportivecareinterventiononqualityoflifeoutcomesinoutpatientswithbreastandgynecologiccancerundergoingchemotherapyresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT uhlmannlorenz theeffectsofanintegratedsupportivecareinterventiononqualityoflifeoutcomesinoutpatientswithbreastandgynecologiccancerundergoingchemotherapyresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bentnermartina theeffectsofanintegratedsupportivecareinterventiononqualityoflifeoutcomesinoutpatientswithbreastandgynecologiccancerundergoingchemotherapyresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schneeweissandreas theeffectsofanintegratedsupportivecareinterventiononqualityoflifeoutcomesinoutpatientswithbreastandgynecologiccancerundergoingchemotherapyresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT muellerandreas theeffectsofanintegratedsupportivecareinterventiononqualityoflifeoutcomesinoutpatientswithbreastandgynecologiccancerundergoingchemotherapyresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT szecsenyijoachim theeffectsofanintegratedsupportivecareinterventiononqualityoflifeoutcomesinoutpatientswithbreastandgynecologiccancerundergoingchemotherapyresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT joosstefanie theeffectsofanintegratedsupportivecareinterventiononqualityoflifeoutcomesinoutpatientswithbreastandgynecologiccancerundergoingchemotherapyresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT klafkenadja effectsofanintegratedsupportivecareinterventiononqualityoflifeoutcomesinoutpatientswithbreastandgynecologiccancerundergoingchemotherapyresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mahlercornelia effectsofanintegratedsupportivecareinterventiononqualityoflifeoutcomesinoutpatientswithbreastandgynecologiccancerundergoingchemotherapyresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vonhagenscornelia effectsofanintegratedsupportivecareinterventiononqualityoflifeoutcomesinoutpatientswithbreastandgynecologiccancerundergoingchemotherapyresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT uhlmannlorenz effectsofanintegratedsupportivecareinterventiononqualityoflifeoutcomesinoutpatientswithbreastandgynecologiccancerundergoingchemotherapyresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bentnermartina effectsofanintegratedsupportivecareinterventiononqualityoflifeoutcomesinoutpatientswithbreastandgynecologiccancerundergoingchemotherapyresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schneeweissandreas effectsofanintegratedsupportivecareinterventiononqualityoflifeoutcomesinoutpatientswithbreastandgynecologiccancerundergoingchemotherapyresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT muellerandreas effectsofanintegratedsupportivecareinterventiononqualityoflifeoutcomesinoutpatientswithbreastandgynecologiccancerundergoingchemotherapyresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT szecsenyijoachim effectsofanintegratedsupportivecareinterventiononqualityoflifeoutcomesinoutpatientswithbreastandgynecologiccancerundergoingchemotherapyresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT joosstefanie effectsofanintegratedsupportivecareinterventiononqualityoflifeoutcomesinoutpatientswithbreastandgynecologiccancerundergoingchemotherapyresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial |