Cargando…
Genetic testing vs microforceps biopsy in pancreatic cysts: Systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytology in pancreatic cystic fluid are suboptimal for evaluation of pancreatic cystic neoplasms. Genetic testing and microforceps biopsy are promising tools for pre-operative diagnostic improvement but comparative performance of both methods is unknown...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6639554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31341368 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i26.3450 |
_version_ | 1783436487180681216 |
---|---|
author | Faias, Sandra Pereira, Luisa Luís, Ângelo Chaves, Paula Cravo, Marília |
author_facet | Faias, Sandra Pereira, Luisa Luís, Ângelo Chaves, Paula Cravo, Marília |
author_sort | Faias, Sandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytology in pancreatic cystic fluid are suboptimal for evaluation of pancreatic cystic neoplasms. Genetic testing and microforceps biopsy are promising tools for pre-operative diagnostic improvement but comparative performance of both methods is unknown. AIM: To compare the accuracy of genetic testing and microforceps biopsy in pancreatic cysts referred for surgery. METHODS: We performed a literature search in Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies evaluating genetic testing of cystic fluid and microforceps biopsy of pancreatic cysts, with endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) prior to surgery and surgical pathology as reference standard for diagnosis. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy for: 1- benign cysts; 2- mucinous low-risk cysts; 3- high-risk cysts, and the diagnostic yield and rate of correctly identified cysts with microforceps biopsy and molecular analysis. We also assessed publication bias, heterogeneity, and study quality. RESULTS: Eight studies, including 1206 patients, of which 203 (17%) referred for surgery who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed in the systematic review, and seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. Genetic testing and microforceps biopsies were identical for diagnosis of benign cysts. Molecular analysis was superior for diagnosis of both low and high-risk mucinous cysts, with sensitivities of 0.89 (95%CI: 0.79-0.95) and 0.57 (95%CI: 0.42-0.71), specificities of 0.88 (95%CI: 0.75-0.95) and 0.88 (95%CI: 0.80-0.93) and AUC of 0.9555 and 0.92, respectively. The diagnostic yield was higher in microforceps biopsies than in genetic analysis (0.73 vs 0.54, respectively) but the rates of correctly identified cysts were identical (0.73 with 95%CI: 0.62-0.82 vs 0.71 with 95%CI: 0.49-0.86, respectively). CONCLUSION: Genetic testing and microforceps biopsies are useful second tests, with identical results in benign pancreatic cysts. Genetic analysis performs better for low- and high-risk cysts but has lower diagnostic yield. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6639554 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66395542019-07-24 Genetic testing vs microforceps biopsy in pancreatic cysts: Systematic review and meta-analysis Faias, Sandra Pereira, Luisa Luís, Ângelo Chaves, Paula Cravo, Marília World J Gastroenterol Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytology in pancreatic cystic fluid are suboptimal for evaluation of pancreatic cystic neoplasms. Genetic testing and microforceps biopsy are promising tools for pre-operative diagnostic improvement but comparative performance of both methods is unknown. AIM: To compare the accuracy of genetic testing and microforceps biopsy in pancreatic cysts referred for surgery. METHODS: We performed a literature search in Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies evaluating genetic testing of cystic fluid and microforceps biopsy of pancreatic cysts, with endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) prior to surgery and surgical pathology as reference standard for diagnosis. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy for: 1- benign cysts; 2- mucinous low-risk cysts; 3- high-risk cysts, and the diagnostic yield and rate of correctly identified cysts with microforceps biopsy and molecular analysis. We also assessed publication bias, heterogeneity, and study quality. RESULTS: Eight studies, including 1206 patients, of which 203 (17%) referred for surgery who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed in the systematic review, and seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. Genetic testing and microforceps biopsies were identical for diagnosis of benign cysts. Molecular analysis was superior for diagnosis of both low and high-risk mucinous cysts, with sensitivities of 0.89 (95%CI: 0.79-0.95) and 0.57 (95%CI: 0.42-0.71), specificities of 0.88 (95%CI: 0.75-0.95) and 0.88 (95%CI: 0.80-0.93) and AUC of 0.9555 and 0.92, respectively. The diagnostic yield was higher in microforceps biopsies than in genetic analysis (0.73 vs 0.54, respectively) but the rates of correctly identified cysts were identical (0.73 with 95%CI: 0.62-0.82 vs 0.71 with 95%CI: 0.49-0.86, respectively). CONCLUSION: Genetic testing and microforceps biopsies are useful second tests, with identical results in benign pancreatic cysts. Genetic analysis performs better for low- and high-risk cysts but has lower diagnostic yield. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019-07-14 2019-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6639554/ /pubmed/31341368 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i26.3450 Text en ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Meta-Analysis Faias, Sandra Pereira, Luisa Luís, Ângelo Chaves, Paula Cravo, Marília Genetic testing vs microforceps biopsy in pancreatic cysts: Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Genetic testing vs microforceps biopsy in pancreatic cysts: Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Genetic testing vs microforceps biopsy in pancreatic cysts: Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Genetic testing vs microforceps biopsy in pancreatic cysts: Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Genetic testing vs microforceps biopsy in pancreatic cysts: Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Genetic testing vs microforceps biopsy in pancreatic cysts: Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | genetic testing vs microforceps biopsy in pancreatic cysts: systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Meta-Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6639554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31341368 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i26.3450 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT faiassandra genetictestingvsmicroforcepsbiopsyinpancreaticcystssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pereiraluisa genetictestingvsmicroforcepsbiopsyinpancreaticcystssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT luisangelo genetictestingvsmicroforcepsbiopsyinpancreaticcystssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chavespaula genetictestingvsmicroforcepsbiopsyinpancreaticcystssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT cravomarilia genetictestingvsmicroforcepsbiopsyinpancreaticcystssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |