Cargando…

Breast Cancer Treatment Response Monitoring Using Quantitative Ultrasound and Texture Analysis: Comparative Analysis of Analytical Models

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop computational algorithms to best determine tumor responses early after the start of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, based on quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and textural analysis in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). METHODS: A total of 100...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sannachi, Lakshmanan, Gangeh, Mehrdad, Tadayyon, Hadi, Gandhi, Sonal, Wright, Frances C., Slodkowska, Elzbieta, Curpen, Belinda, Sadeghi-Naini, Ali, Tran, William, Czarnota, Gregory J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Neoplasia Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6639683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31325763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2019.06.004
_version_ 1783436509676830720
author Sannachi, Lakshmanan
Gangeh, Mehrdad
Tadayyon, Hadi
Gandhi, Sonal
Wright, Frances C.
Slodkowska, Elzbieta
Curpen, Belinda
Sadeghi-Naini, Ali
Tran, William
Czarnota, Gregory J.
author_facet Sannachi, Lakshmanan
Gangeh, Mehrdad
Tadayyon, Hadi
Gandhi, Sonal
Wright, Frances C.
Slodkowska, Elzbieta
Curpen, Belinda
Sadeghi-Naini, Ali
Tran, William
Czarnota, Gregory J.
author_sort Sannachi, Lakshmanan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop computational algorithms to best determine tumor responses early after the start of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, based on quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and textural analysis in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). METHODS: A total of 100 LABC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included in this study. Breast tumors were scanned with a clinical ultrasound system prior to treatment, during the first, fourth and eighth weeks of treatment, and prior to surgery. QUS parameters were calculated from ultrasound radio frequency data within tumor regions. Texture features were extracted from each QUS parametric map. Patients were classified into two groups based on identified clinical/pathological response: responders and non-responders. In order to differentiate treatment responders, three multi-feature response classification algorithms, namely a linear discriminant, a k-nearest-neighbor and a nonlinear support vector machine classifier were compared. RESULTS: All algorithms distinguished responders and non-responders with accuracies ranging between 68% and 92%. In particular, support vector machine performed the best in differentiating responders from non-responders with accuracies of 78%, 90% and 92% at weeks 1, 4 and 8 after the start of treatment, respectively. The most relevant features in separating the two response groups at early stages (weeks 1and 4) were texture features and at a later stage (week 8) were mean QUS parameters, particularly ultrasound backscatter intensity-based parameters. CONCLUSION: An early stage treatment response prediction model developed by quantitative ultrasound and texture analysis combined with modern computational methods permits offering effective alternatives to standard treatment for refractory patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6639683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Neoplasia Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66396832019-07-29 Breast Cancer Treatment Response Monitoring Using Quantitative Ultrasound and Texture Analysis: Comparative Analysis of Analytical Models Sannachi, Lakshmanan Gangeh, Mehrdad Tadayyon, Hadi Gandhi, Sonal Wright, Frances C. Slodkowska, Elzbieta Curpen, Belinda Sadeghi-Naini, Ali Tran, William Czarnota, Gregory J. Transl Oncol Original article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop computational algorithms to best determine tumor responses early after the start of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, based on quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and textural analysis in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). METHODS: A total of 100 LABC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included in this study. Breast tumors were scanned with a clinical ultrasound system prior to treatment, during the first, fourth and eighth weeks of treatment, and prior to surgery. QUS parameters were calculated from ultrasound radio frequency data within tumor regions. Texture features were extracted from each QUS parametric map. Patients were classified into two groups based on identified clinical/pathological response: responders and non-responders. In order to differentiate treatment responders, three multi-feature response classification algorithms, namely a linear discriminant, a k-nearest-neighbor and a nonlinear support vector machine classifier were compared. RESULTS: All algorithms distinguished responders and non-responders with accuracies ranging between 68% and 92%. In particular, support vector machine performed the best in differentiating responders from non-responders with accuracies of 78%, 90% and 92% at weeks 1, 4 and 8 after the start of treatment, respectively. The most relevant features in separating the two response groups at early stages (weeks 1and 4) were texture features and at a later stage (week 8) were mean QUS parameters, particularly ultrasound backscatter intensity-based parameters. CONCLUSION: An early stage treatment response prediction model developed by quantitative ultrasound and texture analysis combined with modern computational methods permits offering effective alternatives to standard treatment for refractory patients. Neoplasia Press 2019-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6639683/ /pubmed/31325763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2019.06.004 Text en © 2019 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Neoplasia Press, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original article
Sannachi, Lakshmanan
Gangeh, Mehrdad
Tadayyon, Hadi
Gandhi, Sonal
Wright, Frances C.
Slodkowska, Elzbieta
Curpen, Belinda
Sadeghi-Naini, Ali
Tran, William
Czarnota, Gregory J.
Breast Cancer Treatment Response Monitoring Using Quantitative Ultrasound and Texture Analysis: Comparative Analysis of Analytical Models
title Breast Cancer Treatment Response Monitoring Using Quantitative Ultrasound and Texture Analysis: Comparative Analysis of Analytical Models
title_full Breast Cancer Treatment Response Monitoring Using Quantitative Ultrasound and Texture Analysis: Comparative Analysis of Analytical Models
title_fullStr Breast Cancer Treatment Response Monitoring Using Quantitative Ultrasound and Texture Analysis: Comparative Analysis of Analytical Models
title_full_unstemmed Breast Cancer Treatment Response Monitoring Using Quantitative Ultrasound and Texture Analysis: Comparative Analysis of Analytical Models
title_short Breast Cancer Treatment Response Monitoring Using Quantitative Ultrasound and Texture Analysis: Comparative Analysis of Analytical Models
title_sort breast cancer treatment response monitoring using quantitative ultrasound and texture analysis: comparative analysis of analytical models
topic Original article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6639683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31325763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2019.06.004
work_keys_str_mv AT sannachilakshmanan breastcancertreatmentresponsemonitoringusingquantitativeultrasoundandtextureanalysiscomparativeanalysisofanalyticalmodels
AT gangehmehrdad breastcancertreatmentresponsemonitoringusingquantitativeultrasoundandtextureanalysiscomparativeanalysisofanalyticalmodels
AT tadayyonhadi breastcancertreatmentresponsemonitoringusingquantitativeultrasoundandtextureanalysiscomparativeanalysisofanalyticalmodels
AT gandhisonal breastcancertreatmentresponsemonitoringusingquantitativeultrasoundandtextureanalysiscomparativeanalysisofanalyticalmodels
AT wrightfrancesc breastcancertreatmentresponsemonitoringusingquantitativeultrasoundandtextureanalysiscomparativeanalysisofanalyticalmodels
AT slodkowskaelzbieta breastcancertreatmentresponsemonitoringusingquantitativeultrasoundandtextureanalysiscomparativeanalysisofanalyticalmodels
AT curpenbelinda breastcancertreatmentresponsemonitoringusingquantitativeultrasoundandtextureanalysiscomparativeanalysisofanalyticalmodels
AT sadeghinainiali breastcancertreatmentresponsemonitoringusingquantitativeultrasoundandtextureanalysiscomparativeanalysisofanalyticalmodels
AT tranwilliam breastcancertreatmentresponsemonitoringusingquantitativeultrasoundandtextureanalysiscomparativeanalysisofanalyticalmodels
AT czarnotagregoryj breastcancertreatmentresponsemonitoringusingquantitativeultrasoundandtextureanalysiscomparativeanalysisofanalyticalmodels