Cargando…
Breast Cancer Treatment Response Monitoring Using Quantitative Ultrasound and Texture Analysis: Comparative Analysis of Analytical Models
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop computational algorithms to best determine tumor responses early after the start of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, based on quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and textural analysis in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). METHODS: A total of 100...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Neoplasia Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6639683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31325763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2019.06.004 |
_version_ | 1783436509676830720 |
---|---|
author | Sannachi, Lakshmanan Gangeh, Mehrdad Tadayyon, Hadi Gandhi, Sonal Wright, Frances C. Slodkowska, Elzbieta Curpen, Belinda Sadeghi-Naini, Ali Tran, William Czarnota, Gregory J. |
author_facet | Sannachi, Lakshmanan Gangeh, Mehrdad Tadayyon, Hadi Gandhi, Sonal Wright, Frances C. Slodkowska, Elzbieta Curpen, Belinda Sadeghi-Naini, Ali Tran, William Czarnota, Gregory J. |
author_sort | Sannachi, Lakshmanan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop computational algorithms to best determine tumor responses early after the start of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, based on quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and textural analysis in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). METHODS: A total of 100 LABC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included in this study. Breast tumors were scanned with a clinical ultrasound system prior to treatment, during the first, fourth and eighth weeks of treatment, and prior to surgery. QUS parameters were calculated from ultrasound radio frequency data within tumor regions. Texture features were extracted from each QUS parametric map. Patients were classified into two groups based on identified clinical/pathological response: responders and non-responders. In order to differentiate treatment responders, three multi-feature response classification algorithms, namely a linear discriminant, a k-nearest-neighbor and a nonlinear support vector machine classifier were compared. RESULTS: All algorithms distinguished responders and non-responders with accuracies ranging between 68% and 92%. In particular, support vector machine performed the best in differentiating responders from non-responders with accuracies of 78%, 90% and 92% at weeks 1, 4 and 8 after the start of treatment, respectively. The most relevant features in separating the two response groups at early stages (weeks 1and 4) were texture features and at a later stage (week 8) were mean QUS parameters, particularly ultrasound backscatter intensity-based parameters. CONCLUSION: An early stage treatment response prediction model developed by quantitative ultrasound and texture analysis combined with modern computational methods permits offering effective alternatives to standard treatment for refractory patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6639683 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Neoplasia Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66396832019-07-29 Breast Cancer Treatment Response Monitoring Using Quantitative Ultrasound and Texture Analysis: Comparative Analysis of Analytical Models Sannachi, Lakshmanan Gangeh, Mehrdad Tadayyon, Hadi Gandhi, Sonal Wright, Frances C. Slodkowska, Elzbieta Curpen, Belinda Sadeghi-Naini, Ali Tran, William Czarnota, Gregory J. Transl Oncol Original article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop computational algorithms to best determine tumor responses early after the start of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, based on quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and textural analysis in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). METHODS: A total of 100 LABC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included in this study. Breast tumors were scanned with a clinical ultrasound system prior to treatment, during the first, fourth and eighth weeks of treatment, and prior to surgery. QUS parameters were calculated from ultrasound radio frequency data within tumor regions. Texture features were extracted from each QUS parametric map. Patients were classified into two groups based on identified clinical/pathological response: responders and non-responders. In order to differentiate treatment responders, three multi-feature response classification algorithms, namely a linear discriminant, a k-nearest-neighbor and a nonlinear support vector machine classifier were compared. RESULTS: All algorithms distinguished responders and non-responders with accuracies ranging between 68% and 92%. In particular, support vector machine performed the best in differentiating responders from non-responders with accuracies of 78%, 90% and 92% at weeks 1, 4 and 8 after the start of treatment, respectively. The most relevant features in separating the two response groups at early stages (weeks 1and 4) were texture features and at a later stage (week 8) were mean QUS parameters, particularly ultrasound backscatter intensity-based parameters. CONCLUSION: An early stage treatment response prediction model developed by quantitative ultrasound and texture analysis combined with modern computational methods permits offering effective alternatives to standard treatment for refractory patients. Neoplasia Press 2019-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6639683/ /pubmed/31325763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2019.06.004 Text en © 2019 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Neoplasia Press, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original article Sannachi, Lakshmanan Gangeh, Mehrdad Tadayyon, Hadi Gandhi, Sonal Wright, Frances C. Slodkowska, Elzbieta Curpen, Belinda Sadeghi-Naini, Ali Tran, William Czarnota, Gregory J. Breast Cancer Treatment Response Monitoring Using Quantitative Ultrasound and Texture Analysis: Comparative Analysis of Analytical Models |
title | Breast Cancer Treatment Response Monitoring Using Quantitative Ultrasound and Texture Analysis: Comparative Analysis of Analytical Models |
title_full | Breast Cancer Treatment Response Monitoring Using Quantitative Ultrasound and Texture Analysis: Comparative Analysis of Analytical Models |
title_fullStr | Breast Cancer Treatment Response Monitoring Using Quantitative Ultrasound and Texture Analysis: Comparative Analysis of Analytical Models |
title_full_unstemmed | Breast Cancer Treatment Response Monitoring Using Quantitative Ultrasound and Texture Analysis: Comparative Analysis of Analytical Models |
title_short | Breast Cancer Treatment Response Monitoring Using Quantitative Ultrasound and Texture Analysis: Comparative Analysis of Analytical Models |
title_sort | breast cancer treatment response monitoring using quantitative ultrasound and texture analysis: comparative analysis of analytical models |
topic | Original article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6639683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31325763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2019.06.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sannachilakshmanan breastcancertreatmentresponsemonitoringusingquantitativeultrasoundandtextureanalysiscomparativeanalysisofanalyticalmodels AT gangehmehrdad breastcancertreatmentresponsemonitoringusingquantitativeultrasoundandtextureanalysiscomparativeanalysisofanalyticalmodels AT tadayyonhadi breastcancertreatmentresponsemonitoringusingquantitativeultrasoundandtextureanalysiscomparativeanalysisofanalyticalmodels AT gandhisonal breastcancertreatmentresponsemonitoringusingquantitativeultrasoundandtextureanalysiscomparativeanalysisofanalyticalmodels AT wrightfrancesc breastcancertreatmentresponsemonitoringusingquantitativeultrasoundandtextureanalysiscomparativeanalysisofanalyticalmodels AT slodkowskaelzbieta breastcancertreatmentresponsemonitoringusingquantitativeultrasoundandtextureanalysiscomparativeanalysisofanalyticalmodels AT curpenbelinda breastcancertreatmentresponsemonitoringusingquantitativeultrasoundandtextureanalysiscomparativeanalysisofanalyticalmodels AT sadeghinainiali breastcancertreatmentresponsemonitoringusingquantitativeultrasoundandtextureanalysiscomparativeanalysisofanalyticalmodels AT tranwilliam breastcancertreatmentresponsemonitoringusingquantitativeultrasoundandtextureanalysiscomparativeanalysisofanalyticalmodels AT czarnotagregoryj breastcancertreatmentresponsemonitoringusingquantitativeultrasoundandtextureanalysiscomparativeanalysisofanalyticalmodels |