Cargando…
Review: An integrated graphical tool for analysing impacts and services provided by livestock farming
Livestock farming is criticized for negatively impacting the environment, concerns about animal welfare and the impact of excessive meat consumption on human health. However, livestock farming provides other underappreciated and poorly communicated benefits to society in terms of employment, product...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6639722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30827290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119000351 |
_version_ | 1783436518119964672 |
---|---|
author | Ryschawy, J. Dumont, B. Therond, O. Donnars, C. Hendrickson, J. Benoit, M. Duru, M. |
author_facet | Ryschawy, J. Dumont, B. Therond, O. Donnars, C. Hendrickson, J. Benoit, M. Duru, M. |
author_sort | Ryschawy, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Livestock farming is criticized for negatively impacting the environment, concerns about animal welfare and the impact of excessive meat consumption on human health. However, livestock farming provides other underappreciated and poorly communicated benefits to society in terms of employment, product quality, cultural landscapes and carbon storage by grasslands. Few attempts have been made so far to simultaneously consider the services and impacts provided by livestock production. Here, we propose an integrated graphical tool, called the ‘barn’ to explicitly summarize the synergies and trade-offs between services and impacts provided by livestock farming. It illustrates livestock farming interacting with its physical, economic and social environment along five interfaces: (i) Markets, (ii) Work and employment, (iii) Inputs, (iv) Environment and climate, (v) Social and cultural factors. This graphical tool was then applied by comparing two contrasting livestock production areas (high livestock density v. grassland-based), and the dominant v. a niche system within a crop-livestock area. We showed the barn could be used for cross-comparisons of services and impacts across livestock production areas, and for multi-level analysis of services and impacts of livestock farming within a given area. The barn graphically summarizes the ecological and socio-economic aspects of livestock farming by explicitly representing multiple services and impacts of different systems in a simple yet informative way. Information for the five interfaces relies on available quantitative assessments from the literature or data sets, and on expert-knowledge for more qualitative factors, such as social and cultural ones. The ‘barn’ can also inform local stakeholders or policy-makers about potential opportunities and threats to the future of livestock farming in specific production areas. It has already been used as a pedagogical tool for teaching the diversity of services and impacts of livestock systems across Europe and is currently developed as a serious game for encouraging knowledge exchange and sharing different viewpoints between stakeholders. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6639722 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66397222019-07-29 Review: An integrated graphical tool for analysing impacts and services provided by livestock farming Ryschawy, J. Dumont, B. Therond, O. Donnars, C. Hendrickson, J. Benoit, M. Duru, M. Animal Review Article Livestock farming is criticized for negatively impacting the environment, concerns about animal welfare and the impact of excessive meat consumption on human health. However, livestock farming provides other underappreciated and poorly communicated benefits to society in terms of employment, product quality, cultural landscapes and carbon storage by grasslands. Few attempts have been made so far to simultaneously consider the services and impacts provided by livestock production. Here, we propose an integrated graphical tool, called the ‘barn’ to explicitly summarize the synergies and trade-offs between services and impacts provided by livestock farming. It illustrates livestock farming interacting with its physical, economic and social environment along five interfaces: (i) Markets, (ii) Work and employment, (iii) Inputs, (iv) Environment and climate, (v) Social and cultural factors. This graphical tool was then applied by comparing two contrasting livestock production areas (high livestock density v. grassland-based), and the dominant v. a niche system within a crop-livestock area. We showed the barn could be used for cross-comparisons of services and impacts across livestock production areas, and for multi-level analysis of services and impacts of livestock farming within a given area. The barn graphically summarizes the ecological and socio-economic aspects of livestock farming by explicitly representing multiple services and impacts of different systems in a simple yet informative way. Information for the five interfaces relies on available quantitative assessments from the literature or data sets, and on expert-knowledge for more qualitative factors, such as social and cultural ones. The ‘barn’ can also inform local stakeholders or policy-makers about potential opportunities and threats to the future of livestock farming in specific production areas. It has already been used as a pedagogical tool for teaching the diversity of services and impacts of livestock systems across Europe and is currently developed as a serious game for encouraging knowledge exchange and sharing different viewpoints between stakeholders. Cambridge University Press 2019-03-04 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6639722/ /pubmed/30827290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119000351 Text en © The Animal Consortium 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Ryschawy, J. Dumont, B. Therond, O. Donnars, C. Hendrickson, J. Benoit, M. Duru, M. Review: An integrated graphical tool for analysing impacts and services provided by livestock farming |
title | Review: An integrated graphical tool for analysing impacts and services provided by livestock farming |
title_full | Review: An integrated graphical tool for analysing impacts and services provided by livestock farming |
title_fullStr | Review: An integrated graphical tool for analysing impacts and services provided by livestock farming |
title_full_unstemmed | Review: An integrated graphical tool for analysing impacts and services provided by livestock farming |
title_short | Review: An integrated graphical tool for analysing impacts and services provided by livestock farming |
title_sort | review: an integrated graphical tool for analysing impacts and services provided by livestock farming |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6639722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30827290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119000351 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ryschawyj reviewanintegratedgraphicaltoolforanalysingimpactsandservicesprovidedbylivestockfarming AT dumontb reviewanintegratedgraphicaltoolforanalysingimpactsandservicesprovidedbylivestockfarming AT therondo reviewanintegratedgraphicaltoolforanalysingimpactsandservicesprovidedbylivestockfarming AT donnarsc reviewanintegratedgraphicaltoolforanalysingimpactsandservicesprovidedbylivestockfarming AT hendricksonj reviewanintegratedgraphicaltoolforanalysingimpactsandservicesprovidedbylivestockfarming AT benoitm reviewanintegratedgraphicaltoolforanalysingimpactsandservicesprovidedbylivestockfarming AT durum reviewanintegratedgraphicaltoolforanalysingimpactsandservicesprovidedbylivestockfarming |