Cargando…

Review: An integrated graphical tool for analysing impacts and services provided by livestock farming

Livestock farming is criticized for negatively impacting the environment, concerns about animal welfare and the impact of excessive meat consumption on human health. However, livestock farming provides other underappreciated and poorly communicated benefits to society in terms of employment, product...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ryschawy, J., Dumont, B., Therond, O., Donnars, C., Hendrickson, J., Benoit, M., Duru, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6639722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30827290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119000351
_version_ 1783436518119964672
author Ryschawy, J.
Dumont, B.
Therond, O.
Donnars, C.
Hendrickson, J.
Benoit, M.
Duru, M.
author_facet Ryschawy, J.
Dumont, B.
Therond, O.
Donnars, C.
Hendrickson, J.
Benoit, M.
Duru, M.
author_sort Ryschawy, J.
collection PubMed
description Livestock farming is criticized for negatively impacting the environment, concerns about animal welfare and the impact of excessive meat consumption on human health. However, livestock farming provides other underappreciated and poorly communicated benefits to society in terms of employment, product quality, cultural landscapes and carbon storage by grasslands. Few attempts have been made so far to simultaneously consider the services and impacts provided by livestock production. Here, we propose an integrated graphical tool, called the ‘barn’ to explicitly summarize the synergies and trade-offs between services and impacts provided by livestock farming. It illustrates livestock farming interacting with its physical, economic and social environment along five interfaces: (i) Markets, (ii) Work and employment, (iii) Inputs, (iv) Environment and climate, (v) Social and cultural factors. This graphical tool was then applied by comparing two contrasting livestock production areas (high livestock density v. grassland-based), and the dominant v. a niche system within a crop-livestock area. We showed the barn could be used for cross-comparisons of services and impacts across livestock production areas, and for multi-level analysis of services and impacts of livestock farming within a given area. The barn graphically summarizes the ecological and socio-economic aspects of livestock farming by explicitly representing multiple services and impacts of different systems in a simple yet informative way. Information for the five interfaces relies on available quantitative assessments from the literature or data sets, and on expert-knowledge for more qualitative factors, such as social and cultural ones. The ‘barn’ can also inform local stakeholders or policy-makers about potential opportunities and threats to the future of livestock farming in specific production areas. It has already been used as a pedagogical tool for teaching the diversity of services and impacts of livestock systems across Europe and is currently developed as a serious game for encouraging knowledge exchange and sharing different viewpoints between stakeholders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6639722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66397222019-07-29 Review: An integrated graphical tool for analysing impacts and services provided by livestock farming Ryschawy, J. Dumont, B. Therond, O. Donnars, C. Hendrickson, J. Benoit, M. Duru, M. Animal Review Article Livestock farming is criticized for negatively impacting the environment, concerns about animal welfare and the impact of excessive meat consumption on human health. However, livestock farming provides other underappreciated and poorly communicated benefits to society in terms of employment, product quality, cultural landscapes and carbon storage by grasslands. Few attempts have been made so far to simultaneously consider the services and impacts provided by livestock production. Here, we propose an integrated graphical tool, called the ‘barn’ to explicitly summarize the synergies and trade-offs between services and impacts provided by livestock farming. It illustrates livestock farming interacting with its physical, economic and social environment along five interfaces: (i) Markets, (ii) Work and employment, (iii) Inputs, (iv) Environment and climate, (v) Social and cultural factors. This graphical tool was then applied by comparing two contrasting livestock production areas (high livestock density v. grassland-based), and the dominant v. a niche system within a crop-livestock area. We showed the barn could be used for cross-comparisons of services and impacts across livestock production areas, and for multi-level analysis of services and impacts of livestock farming within a given area. The barn graphically summarizes the ecological and socio-economic aspects of livestock farming by explicitly representing multiple services and impacts of different systems in a simple yet informative way. Information for the five interfaces relies on available quantitative assessments from the literature or data sets, and on expert-knowledge for more qualitative factors, such as social and cultural ones. The ‘barn’ can also inform local stakeholders or policy-makers about potential opportunities and threats to the future of livestock farming in specific production areas. It has already been used as a pedagogical tool for teaching the diversity of services and impacts of livestock systems across Europe and is currently developed as a serious game for encouraging knowledge exchange and sharing different viewpoints between stakeholders. Cambridge University Press 2019-03-04 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6639722/ /pubmed/30827290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119000351 Text en © The Animal Consortium 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Ryschawy, J.
Dumont, B.
Therond, O.
Donnars, C.
Hendrickson, J.
Benoit, M.
Duru, M.
Review: An integrated graphical tool for analysing impacts and services provided by livestock farming
title Review: An integrated graphical tool for analysing impacts and services provided by livestock farming
title_full Review: An integrated graphical tool for analysing impacts and services provided by livestock farming
title_fullStr Review: An integrated graphical tool for analysing impacts and services provided by livestock farming
title_full_unstemmed Review: An integrated graphical tool for analysing impacts and services provided by livestock farming
title_short Review: An integrated graphical tool for analysing impacts and services provided by livestock farming
title_sort review: an integrated graphical tool for analysing impacts and services provided by livestock farming
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6639722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30827290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119000351
work_keys_str_mv AT ryschawyj reviewanintegratedgraphicaltoolforanalysingimpactsandservicesprovidedbylivestockfarming
AT dumontb reviewanintegratedgraphicaltoolforanalysingimpactsandservicesprovidedbylivestockfarming
AT therondo reviewanintegratedgraphicaltoolforanalysingimpactsandservicesprovidedbylivestockfarming
AT donnarsc reviewanintegratedgraphicaltoolforanalysingimpactsandservicesprovidedbylivestockfarming
AT hendricksonj reviewanintegratedgraphicaltoolforanalysingimpactsandservicesprovidedbylivestockfarming
AT benoitm reviewanintegratedgraphicaltoolforanalysingimpactsandservicesprovidedbylivestockfarming
AT durum reviewanintegratedgraphicaltoolforanalysingimpactsandservicesprovidedbylivestockfarming