Cargando…

Preoperative Dural Contact and Recurrence Risk After Surgical Cavity Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: New Evidence in Support of Consensus Guidelines

PURPOSE: The incidence of brain metastases is increasing as a result of more routine diagnostic imaging and improved extracranial systemic treatment strategies. As noted in recent consensus guidelines, postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to the resection cavity has lower rates of local con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Susko, Matthew, Yu, Yao, Ma, Lijun, Nakamura, Jean, Fogh, Shannon, Raleigh, David R., Golden, Encouse, Theodosopoulos, Philip V., McDermott, Michael W., Sneed, Penny K., Braunstein, Steve E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6639748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31360800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2019.03.002
_version_ 1783436523521179648
author Susko, Matthew
Yu, Yao
Ma, Lijun
Nakamura, Jean
Fogh, Shannon
Raleigh, David R.
Golden, Encouse
Theodosopoulos, Philip V.
McDermott, Michael W.
Sneed, Penny K.
Braunstein, Steve E.
author_facet Susko, Matthew
Yu, Yao
Ma, Lijun
Nakamura, Jean
Fogh, Shannon
Raleigh, David R.
Golden, Encouse
Theodosopoulos, Philip V.
McDermott, Michael W.
Sneed, Penny K.
Braunstein, Steve E.
author_sort Susko, Matthew
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The incidence of brain metastases is increasing as a result of more routine diagnostic imaging and improved extracranial systemic treatment strategies. As noted in recent consensus guidelines, postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to the resection cavity has lower rates of local control than whole brain radiation therapy but improved cognitive outcomes. Further analyses are needed to improve local control and minimize toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients receiving SRS to a resection cavity between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Presurgical variables, including tumor location, diameter, dural/meningeal contact, and histology, were collected, as were SRS treatment parameters. Patients had routine follow-up with magnetic resonance imaging, and those noted to have local failure were further assessed for the recurrence location, distance from the target volume, and dosimetric characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, 82 patients and 85 resection cavities underwent postoperative SRS during the study period. Of these, 58 patients with 60 resection cavities with available follow-up magnetic resonance imaging scans were included in this analysis. With a median follow-up of 19.8 months, local recurrence occurred in 12 of the resection cavities for a 15% 1-year and 18% 2-year local recurrence rate. Pretreatment tumor volume contacted the dura/meninges in 100% of cavities with recurrence versus 67% of controlled cavities (P = .025). A total of 5 infield, 5 marginal, and 4 out-of-field recurrences were found, with a median distance to the centroid from the target volume of 3 mm. The addition of a 10-mm dural margin increased the target volume overlap with the recurrence contours for 10 of the 14 recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: Dural contact was associated with an increased rate of recurrence for patients who received SRS to a surgical cavity, and the median distance of marginal recurrences from the target volume was 3 mm. These results provide evidence in support of recent consensus guidelines suggesting that additional dural margin on SRS volumes may benefit local control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6639748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66397482019-07-29 Preoperative Dural Contact and Recurrence Risk After Surgical Cavity Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: New Evidence in Support of Consensus Guidelines Susko, Matthew Yu, Yao Ma, Lijun Nakamura, Jean Fogh, Shannon Raleigh, David R. Golden, Encouse Theodosopoulos, Philip V. McDermott, Michael W. Sneed, Penny K. Braunstein, Steve E. Adv Radiat Oncol Central Nervous System PURPOSE: The incidence of brain metastases is increasing as a result of more routine diagnostic imaging and improved extracranial systemic treatment strategies. As noted in recent consensus guidelines, postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to the resection cavity has lower rates of local control than whole brain radiation therapy but improved cognitive outcomes. Further analyses are needed to improve local control and minimize toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients receiving SRS to a resection cavity between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Presurgical variables, including tumor location, diameter, dural/meningeal contact, and histology, were collected, as were SRS treatment parameters. Patients had routine follow-up with magnetic resonance imaging, and those noted to have local failure were further assessed for the recurrence location, distance from the target volume, and dosimetric characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, 82 patients and 85 resection cavities underwent postoperative SRS during the study period. Of these, 58 patients with 60 resection cavities with available follow-up magnetic resonance imaging scans were included in this analysis. With a median follow-up of 19.8 months, local recurrence occurred in 12 of the resection cavities for a 15% 1-year and 18% 2-year local recurrence rate. Pretreatment tumor volume contacted the dura/meninges in 100% of cavities with recurrence versus 67% of controlled cavities (P = .025). A total of 5 infield, 5 marginal, and 4 out-of-field recurrences were found, with a median distance to the centroid from the target volume of 3 mm. The addition of a 10-mm dural margin increased the target volume overlap with the recurrence contours for 10 of the 14 recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: Dural contact was associated with an increased rate of recurrence for patients who received SRS to a surgical cavity, and the median distance of marginal recurrences from the target volume was 3 mm. These results provide evidence in support of recent consensus guidelines suggesting that additional dural margin on SRS volumes may benefit local control. Elsevier 2019-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6639748/ /pubmed/31360800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2019.03.002 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Central Nervous System
Susko, Matthew
Yu, Yao
Ma, Lijun
Nakamura, Jean
Fogh, Shannon
Raleigh, David R.
Golden, Encouse
Theodosopoulos, Philip V.
McDermott, Michael W.
Sneed, Penny K.
Braunstein, Steve E.
Preoperative Dural Contact and Recurrence Risk After Surgical Cavity Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: New Evidence in Support of Consensus Guidelines
title Preoperative Dural Contact and Recurrence Risk After Surgical Cavity Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: New Evidence in Support of Consensus Guidelines
title_full Preoperative Dural Contact and Recurrence Risk After Surgical Cavity Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: New Evidence in Support of Consensus Guidelines
title_fullStr Preoperative Dural Contact and Recurrence Risk After Surgical Cavity Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: New Evidence in Support of Consensus Guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Preoperative Dural Contact and Recurrence Risk After Surgical Cavity Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: New Evidence in Support of Consensus Guidelines
title_short Preoperative Dural Contact and Recurrence Risk After Surgical Cavity Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: New Evidence in Support of Consensus Guidelines
title_sort preoperative dural contact and recurrence risk after surgical cavity stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: new evidence in support of consensus guidelines
topic Central Nervous System
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6639748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31360800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2019.03.002
work_keys_str_mv AT suskomatthew preoperativeduralcontactandrecurrenceriskaftersurgicalcavitystereotacticradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasesnewevidenceinsupportofconsensusguidelines
AT yuyao preoperativeduralcontactandrecurrenceriskaftersurgicalcavitystereotacticradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasesnewevidenceinsupportofconsensusguidelines
AT malijun preoperativeduralcontactandrecurrenceriskaftersurgicalcavitystereotacticradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasesnewevidenceinsupportofconsensusguidelines
AT nakamurajean preoperativeduralcontactandrecurrenceriskaftersurgicalcavitystereotacticradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasesnewevidenceinsupportofconsensusguidelines
AT foghshannon preoperativeduralcontactandrecurrenceriskaftersurgicalcavitystereotacticradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasesnewevidenceinsupportofconsensusguidelines
AT raleighdavidr preoperativeduralcontactandrecurrenceriskaftersurgicalcavitystereotacticradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasesnewevidenceinsupportofconsensusguidelines
AT goldenencouse preoperativeduralcontactandrecurrenceriskaftersurgicalcavitystereotacticradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasesnewevidenceinsupportofconsensusguidelines
AT theodosopoulosphilipv preoperativeduralcontactandrecurrenceriskaftersurgicalcavitystereotacticradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasesnewevidenceinsupportofconsensusguidelines
AT mcdermottmichaelw preoperativeduralcontactandrecurrenceriskaftersurgicalcavitystereotacticradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasesnewevidenceinsupportofconsensusguidelines
AT sneedpennyk preoperativeduralcontactandrecurrenceriskaftersurgicalcavitystereotacticradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasesnewevidenceinsupportofconsensusguidelines
AT braunsteinstevee preoperativeduralcontactandrecurrenceriskaftersurgicalcavitystereotacticradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasesnewevidenceinsupportofconsensusguidelines