Cargando…

Objective optical quality in eyes with customized selection of aspheric intraocular lens implantation

BACKGROUND: To compare the postoperative optical quality in eyes with customized selection and random selection of aspheric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. METHODS: A prospective, nonrandomized study was implemented in adult cataract patients who underwent unilateral phacoemulsification with as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan, Qing-Qing, Lin, Jia, Tian, Jing, Liao, Xuan, Lan, Chang-Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6639902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31319806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1162-6
_version_ 1783436553147645952
author Tan, Qing-Qing
Lin, Jia
Tian, Jing
Liao, Xuan
Lan, Chang-Jun
author_facet Tan, Qing-Qing
Lin, Jia
Tian, Jing
Liao, Xuan
Lan, Chang-Jun
author_sort Tan, Qing-Qing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the postoperative optical quality in eyes with customized selection and random selection of aspheric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. METHODS: A prospective, nonrandomized study was implemented in adult cataract patients who underwent unilateral phacoemulsification with aspheric IOL implantation. Patients were allocated into two treatment groups: a customized group and a control group. In the customized group, the aspheric IOL selection was based on the corneal spherical aberration to enable the postoperative target ocular spherical aberration closest to zero; in the control group, the aspheric IOLs were chosen using a random strategy. Primary outcome measurements included the following objective optical quality assessments: higher-order aberrations obtained by a Hartmann-shack aberrometer at 4 mm and 6 mm pupil diameters; objective scatter index (OSI), modulation transfer function (MTF) cut-off, Strehl ratio (SR) and a simulated contrast visual acuity—optical quality analysis system value (OV) obtained by a double-pass system with a 4-mm aperture. Subjective visual acuity was measured as secondary outcome. All the patients were followed up for 3 months. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients in the customized group and 78 patients in the control group were evaluated. There was no significant difference in postoperative visual acuity between the two groups (P > 0.05). Significantly less ocular higher-order aberrations were shown in the customized group (P < 0.05). No significant difference was shown in OSI, MTF cut-off, SR and OV between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although customized selection of aspheric IOL implantation showed less postoperative ocular aberrations, it performed similarly to random selection of aspheric IOL implantation in terms of postoperative visual acuity, simulated contrast visual acuity, intraocular scatter, modulation transfer function and Strehl ratio. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered on 07/06/2019. Registration number: ChiCTR1900024356.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6639902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66399022019-07-29 Objective optical quality in eyes with customized selection of aspheric intraocular lens implantation Tan, Qing-Qing Lin, Jia Tian, Jing Liao, Xuan Lan, Chang-Jun BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: To compare the postoperative optical quality in eyes with customized selection and random selection of aspheric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. METHODS: A prospective, nonrandomized study was implemented in adult cataract patients who underwent unilateral phacoemulsification with aspheric IOL implantation. Patients were allocated into two treatment groups: a customized group and a control group. In the customized group, the aspheric IOL selection was based on the corneal spherical aberration to enable the postoperative target ocular spherical aberration closest to zero; in the control group, the aspheric IOLs were chosen using a random strategy. Primary outcome measurements included the following objective optical quality assessments: higher-order aberrations obtained by a Hartmann-shack aberrometer at 4 mm and 6 mm pupil diameters; objective scatter index (OSI), modulation transfer function (MTF) cut-off, Strehl ratio (SR) and a simulated contrast visual acuity—optical quality analysis system value (OV) obtained by a double-pass system with a 4-mm aperture. Subjective visual acuity was measured as secondary outcome. All the patients were followed up for 3 months. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients in the customized group and 78 patients in the control group were evaluated. There was no significant difference in postoperative visual acuity between the two groups (P > 0.05). Significantly less ocular higher-order aberrations were shown in the customized group (P < 0.05). No significant difference was shown in OSI, MTF cut-off, SR and OV between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although customized selection of aspheric IOL implantation showed less postoperative ocular aberrations, it performed similarly to random selection of aspheric IOL implantation in terms of postoperative visual acuity, simulated contrast visual acuity, intraocular scatter, modulation transfer function and Strehl ratio. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered on 07/06/2019. Registration number: ChiCTR1900024356. BioMed Central 2019-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6639902/ /pubmed/31319806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1162-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tan, Qing-Qing
Lin, Jia
Tian, Jing
Liao, Xuan
Lan, Chang-Jun
Objective optical quality in eyes with customized selection of aspheric intraocular lens implantation
title Objective optical quality in eyes with customized selection of aspheric intraocular lens implantation
title_full Objective optical quality in eyes with customized selection of aspheric intraocular lens implantation
title_fullStr Objective optical quality in eyes with customized selection of aspheric intraocular lens implantation
title_full_unstemmed Objective optical quality in eyes with customized selection of aspheric intraocular lens implantation
title_short Objective optical quality in eyes with customized selection of aspheric intraocular lens implantation
title_sort objective optical quality in eyes with customized selection of aspheric intraocular lens implantation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6639902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31319806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1162-6
work_keys_str_mv AT tanqingqing objectiveopticalqualityineyeswithcustomizedselectionofasphericintraocularlensimplantation
AT linjia objectiveopticalqualityineyeswithcustomizedselectionofasphericintraocularlensimplantation
AT tianjing objectiveopticalqualityineyeswithcustomizedselectionofasphericintraocularlensimplantation
AT liaoxuan objectiveopticalqualityineyeswithcustomizedselectionofasphericintraocularlensimplantation
AT lanchangjun objectiveopticalqualityineyeswithcustomizedselectionofasphericintraocularlensimplantation