Cargando…
Venom allergy treatment practices in Poland in comparison to guidelines: next edition of the national audit
INTRODUCTION: Venom immunotherapy treatment (VIT) is the only causal treatment of hymenoptera venom anaphylaxis, which aims to provide long-lasting immunoprotection against severe reactions to subsequent stings. AIM: To reassess the compliance of VIT procedures in the Polish allergy centres with the...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6640023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31333352 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ada.2019.85642 |
_version_ | 1783436578429861888 |
---|---|
author | Cichocka-Jarosz, Ewa Stobiecki, Marcin Nittner-Marszalska, Marita Jedynak-Wąsowicz, Urszula Brzyski, Piotr |
author_facet | Cichocka-Jarosz, Ewa Stobiecki, Marcin Nittner-Marszalska, Marita Jedynak-Wąsowicz, Urszula Brzyski, Piotr |
author_sort | Cichocka-Jarosz, Ewa |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Venom immunotherapy treatment (VIT) is the only causal treatment of hymenoptera venom anaphylaxis, which aims to provide long-lasting immunoprotection against severe reactions to subsequent stings. AIM: To reassess the compliance of VIT procedures in the Polish allergy centres with the European guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A structured questionnaire survey conducted in all 33 VIT-centres. The response rate was 94%. RESULTS: The ultrarush initial protocol was the most common protocol (71%, n = 22), usually lasting for 3.5 h (50%, n = 7). The most frequent (36%, n = 11) time interval from the initial to the first maintenance dose (MD) was 14 days, ranging from 7 to 35 days. All centres used an MD of 100 μg. The most frequent time interval between subsequent MDs was 4 weeks (58%, n = 18). Five years’ of VIT was declared by 71% (n = 22). Before the termination of treatment, more than half of the centres (58%, n = 18) performed sIgE and almost half (42%, n = 13) performed skin tests. To confirm VIT efficacy, few centres (26%, n = 8) conducted the sting challenge. About half of centres provided the patients with an adrenalin auto-injector both at the time of initial diagnostics and at the end of treatment. More than half (55%, n = 17) used antihistamines in all patients. Almost half (45%, n = 14) declared to stop treatment with β-blockers and almost one fourth (23%, n = 7) discontinued angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: In the most important procedures, there is a very high compliance with the guidelines. In the areas where the guidelines are not precise, we observed a large spread of results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6640023 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66400232019-07-22 Venom allergy treatment practices in Poland in comparison to guidelines: next edition of the national audit Cichocka-Jarosz, Ewa Stobiecki, Marcin Nittner-Marszalska, Marita Jedynak-Wąsowicz, Urszula Brzyski, Piotr Postepy Dermatol Alergol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Venom immunotherapy treatment (VIT) is the only causal treatment of hymenoptera venom anaphylaxis, which aims to provide long-lasting immunoprotection against severe reactions to subsequent stings. AIM: To reassess the compliance of VIT procedures in the Polish allergy centres with the European guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A structured questionnaire survey conducted in all 33 VIT-centres. The response rate was 94%. RESULTS: The ultrarush initial protocol was the most common protocol (71%, n = 22), usually lasting for 3.5 h (50%, n = 7). The most frequent (36%, n = 11) time interval from the initial to the first maintenance dose (MD) was 14 days, ranging from 7 to 35 days. All centres used an MD of 100 μg. The most frequent time interval between subsequent MDs was 4 weeks (58%, n = 18). Five years’ of VIT was declared by 71% (n = 22). Before the termination of treatment, more than half of the centres (58%, n = 18) performed sIgE and almost half (42%, n = 13) performed skin tests. To confirm VIT efficacy, few centres (26%, n = 8) conducted the sting challenge. About half of centres provided the patients with an adrenalin auto-injector both at the time of initial diagnostics and at the end of treatment. More than half (55%, n = 17) used antihistamines in all patients. Almost half (45%, n = 14) declared to stop treatment with β-blockers and almost one fourth (23%, n = 7) discontinued angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: In the most important procedures, there is a very high compliance with the guidelines. In the areas where the guidelines are not precise, we observed a large spread of results. Termedia Publishing House 2019-06-19 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6640023/ /pubmed/31333352 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ada.2019.85642 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Cichocka-Jarosz, Ewa Stobiecki, Marcin Nittner-Marszalska, Marita Jedynak-Wąsowicz, Urszula Brzyski, Piotr Venom allergy treatment practices in Poland in comparison to guidelines: next edition of the national audit |
title | Venom allergy treatment practices in Poland in comparison to guidelines: next edition of the national audit |
title_full | Venom allergy treatment practices in Poland in comparison to guidelines: next edition of the national audit |
title_fullStr | Venom allergy treatment practices in Poland in comparison to guidelines: next edition of the national audit |
title_full_unstemmed | Venom allergy treatment practices in Poland in comparison to guidelines: next edition of the national audit |
title_short | Venom allergy treatment practices in Poland in comparison to guidelines: next edition of the national audit |
title_sort | venom allergy treatment practices in poland in comparison to guidelines: next edition of the national audit |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6640023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31333352 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ada.2019.85642 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cichockajaroszewa venomallergytreatmentpracticesinpolandincomparisontoguidelinesnexteditionofthenationalaudit AT stobieckimarcin venomallergytreatmentpracticesinpolandincomparisontoguidelinesnexteditionofthenationalaudit AT nittnermarszalskamarita venomallergytreatmentpracticesinpolandincomparisontoguidelinesnexteditionofthenationalaudit AT jedynakwasowiczurszula venomallergytreatmentpracticesinpolandincomparisontoguidelinesnexteditionofthenationalaudit AT brzyskipiotr venomallergytreatmentpracticesinpolandincomparisontoguidelinesnexteditionofthenationalaudit AT venomallergytreatmentpracticesinpolandincomparisontoguidelinesnexteditionofthenationalaudit |