Cargando…
Are Corticosteroids Beneficial for Sepsis and Septic Shock? Based on Pooling Analysis of 16 Studies
Background: A host of systematic reviews and meta-analyses were carried out to estimate the role of corticosteroids in sepsis and septic shock. Discordant opinions were investigated to determine whether patients who experienced sepsis and septic shock could benefit from corticosteroids treatment. Ou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6640176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31354473 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00714 |
_version_ | 1783436595406307328 |
---|---|
author | Yao, Yang-Yang Lin, Lu-Lu Gu, Hui-Yun Wu, Jun-Yi Niu, Yu-Ming Zhang, Chao |
author_facet | Yao, Yang-Yang Lin, Lu-Lu Gu, Hui-Yun Wu, Jun-Yi Niu, Yu-Ming Zhang, Chao |
author_sort | Yao, Yang-Yang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: A host of systematic reviews and meta-analyses were carried out to estimate the role of corticosteroids in sepsis and septic shock. Discordant opinions were investigated to determine whether patients who experienced sepsis and septic shock could benefit from corticosteroids treatment. Our purpose is to perform a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses, to explore the role of corticosteroids in the treatment of sepsis and septic shock. Method: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and LILACS were searched for eligible studies. Two authors individually extracted the relevant data and evaluated the quality of the meta-analysis using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) and ROBIS. The Jadad decision algorithm was implemented to identify the meta-analyses that offered the optimal level of evidence. Result: Sixteen meta-analyses met the eligibility criteria. None of the studies that reported mortality illustrated a significant improvement on mortality (14-day and 90-day), but a 28-day mortality on a long course of a low dose corticosteroids was described. Only four studies stated that a long course of low-dose corticosteroids had advantageous effect on 28-day mortality. A meta-analysis by Fang et al. was regarded as the highest level of evidence in the Jadad decision algorithm among the meta-analyses that were investigated in this systematic review. Conclusion: The 28-day mortality was reduced, as well as the mortality in the ICU and hospital and the length of stay in the ICU, using a long course of low-dose corticosteroids. This was demonstrated by a meta-analysis of the current optimal available evidence. Additionally, significant improvements on the adverse events of hyperglycemia and hypernatraemia have been made. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6640176 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66401762019-07-26 Are Corticosteroids Beneficial for Sepsis and Septic Shock? Based on Pooling Analysis of 16 Studies Yao, Yang-Yang Lin, Lu-Lu Gu, Hui-Yun Wu, Jun-Yi Niu, Yu-Ming Zhang, Chao Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: A host of systematic reviews and meta-analyses were carried out to estimate the role of corticosteroids in sepsis and septic shock. Discordant opinions were investigated to determine whether patients who experienced sepsis and septic shock could benefit from corticosteroids treatment. Our purpose is to perform a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses, to explore the role of corticosteroids in the treatment of sepsis and septic shock. Method: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and LILACS were searched for eligible studies. Two authors individually extracted the relevant data and evaluated the quality of the meta-analysis using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) and ROBIS. The Jadad decision algorithm was implemented to identify the meta-analyses that offered the optimal level of evidence. Result: Sixteen meta-analyses met the eligibility criteria. None of the studies that reported mortality illustrated a significant improvement on mortality (14-day and 90-day), but a 28-day mortality on a long course of a low dose corticosteroids was described. Only four studies stated that a long course of low-dose corticosteroids had advantageous effect on 28-day mortality. A meta-analysis by Fang et al. was regarded as the highest level of evidence in the Jadad decision algorithm among the meta-analyses that were investigated in this systematic review. Conclusion: The 28-day mortality was reduced, as well as the mortality in the ICU and hospital and the length of stay in the ICU, using a long course of low-dose corticosteroids. This was demonstrated by a meta-analysis of the current optimal available evidence. Additionally, significant improvements on the adverse events of hyperglycemia and hypernatraemia have been made. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6640176/ /pubmed/31354473 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00714 Text en Copyright © 2019 Yao, Lin, Gu, Wu, Niu and Zhang http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Yao, Yang-Yang Lin, Lu-Lu Gu, Hui-Yun Wu, Jun-Yi Niu, Yu-Ming Zhang, Chao Are Corticosteroids Beneficial for Sepsis and Septic Shock? Based on Pooling Analysis of 16 Studies |
title | Are Corticosteroids Beneficial for Sepsis and Septic Shock? Based on Pooling Analysis of 16 Studies |
title_full | Are Corticosteroids Beneficial for Sepsis and Septic Shock? Based on Pooling Analysis of 16 Studies |
title_fullStr | Are Corticosteroids Beneficial for Sepsis and Septic Shock? Based on Pooling Analysis of 16 Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Are Corticosteroids Beneficial for Sepsis and Septic Shock? Based on Pooling Analysis of 16 Studies |
title_short | Are Corticosteroids Beneficial for Sepsis and Septic Shock? Based on Pooling Analysis of 16 Studies |
title_sort | are corticosteroids beneficial for sepsis and septic shock? based on pooling analysis of 16 studies |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6640176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31354473 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00714 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yaoyangyang arecorticosteroidsbeneficialforsepsisandsepticshockbasedonpoolinganalysisof16studies AT linlulu arecorticosteroidsbeneficialforsepsisandsepticshockbasedonpoolinganalysisof16studies AT guhuiyun arecorticosteroidsbeneficialforsepsisandsepticshockbasedonpoolinganalysisof16studies AT wujunyi arecorticosteroidsbeneficialforsepsisandsepticshockbasedonpoolinganalysisof16studies AT niuyuming arecorticosteroidsbeneficialforsepsisandsepticshockbasedonpoolinganalysisof16studies AT zhangchao arecorticosteroidsbeneficialforsepsisandsepticshockbasedonpoolinganalysisof16studies |