Cargando…

Are Corticosteroids Beneficial for Sepsis and Septic Shock? Based on Pooling Analysis of 16 Studies

Background: A host of systematic reviews and meta-analyses were carried out to estimate the role of corticosteroids in sepsis and septic shock. Discordant opinions were investigated to determine whether patients who experienced sepsis and septic shock could benefit from corticosteroids treatment. Ou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yao, Yang-Yang, Lin, Lu-Lu, Gu, Hui-Yun, Wu, Jun-Yi, Niu, Yu-Ming, Zhang, Chao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6640176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31354473
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00714
_version_ 1783436595406307328
author Yao, Yang-Yang
Lin, Lu-Lu
Gu, Hui-Yun
Wu, Jun-Yi
Niu, Yu-Ming
Zhang, Chao
author_facet Yao, Yang-Yang
Lin, Lu-Lu
Gu, Hui-Yun
Wu, Jun-Yi
Niu, Yu-Ming
Zhang, Chao
author_sort Yao, Yang-Yang
collection PubMed
description Background: A host of systematic reviews and meta-analyses were carried out to estimate the role of corticosteroids in sepsis and septic shock. Discordant opinions were investigated to determine whether patients who experienced sepsis and septic shock could benefit from corticosteroids treatment. Our purpose is to perform a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses, to explore the role of corticosteroids in the treatment of sepsis and septic shock. Method: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and LILACS were searched for eligible studies. Two authors individually extracted the relevant data and evaluated the quality of the meta-analysis using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) and ROBIS. The Jadad decision algorithm was implemented to identify the meta-analyses that offered the optimal level of evidence. Result: Sixteen meta-analyses met the eligibility criteria. None of the studies that reported mortality illustrated a significant improvement on mortality (14-day and 90-day), but a 28-day mortality on a long course of a low dose corticosteroids was described. Only four studies stated that a long course of low-dose corticosteroids had advantageous effect on 28-day mortality. A meta-analysis by Fang et al. was regarded as the highest level of evidence in the Jadad decision algorithm among the meta-analyses that were investigated in this systematic review. Conclusion: The 28-day mortality was reduced, as well as the mortality in the ICU and hospital and the length of stay in the ICU, using a long course of low-dose corticosteroids. This was demonstrated by a meta-analysis of the current optimal available evidence. Additionally, significant improvements on the adverse events of hyperglycemia and hypernatraemia have been made.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6640176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66401762019-07-26 Are Corticosteroids Beneficial for Sepsis and Septic Shock? Based on Pooling Analysis of 16 Studies Yao, Yang-Yang Lin, Lu-Lu Gu, Hui-Yun Wu, Jun-Yi Niu, Yu-Ming Zhang, Chao Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: A host of systematic reviews and meta-analyses were carried out to estimate the role of corticosteroids in sepsis and septic shock. Discordant opinions were investigated to determine whether patients who experienced sepsis and septic shock could benefit from corticosteroids treatment. Our purpose is to perform a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses, to explore the role of corticosteroids in the treatment of sepsis and septic shock. Method: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and LILACS were searched for eligible studies. Two authors individually extracted the relevant data and evaluated the quality of the meta-analysis using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) and ROBIS. The Jadad decision algorithm was implemented to identify the meta-analyses that offered the optimal level of evidence. Result: Sixteen meta-analyses met the eligibility criteria. None of the studies that reported mortality illustrated a significant improvement on mortality (14-day and 90-day), but a 28-day mortality on a long course of a low dose corticosteroids was described. Only four studies stated that a long course of low-dose corticosteroids had advantageous effect on 28-day mortality. A meta-analysis by Fang et al. was regarded as the highest level of evidence in the Jadad decision algorithm among the meta-analyses that were investigated in this systematic review. Conclusion: The 28-day mortality was reduced, as well as the mortality in the ICU and hospital and the length of stay in the ICU, using a long course of low-dose corticosteroids. This was demonstrated by a meta-analysis of the current optimal available evidence. Additionally, significant improvements on the adverse events of hyperglycemia and hypernatraemia have been made. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6640176/ /pubmed/31354473 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00714 Text en Copyright © 2019 Yao, Lin, Gu, Wu, Niu and Zhang http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Yao, Yang-Yang
Lin, Lu-Lu
Gu, Hui-Yun
Wu, Jun-Yi
Niu, Yu-Ming
Zhang, Chao
Are Corticosteroids Beneficial for Sepsis and Septic Shock? Based on Pooling Analysis of 16 Studies
title Are Corticosteroids Beneficial for Sepsis and Septic Shock? Based on Pooling Analysis of 16 Studies
title_full Are Corticosteroids Beneficial for Sepsis and Septic Shock? Based on Pooling Analysis of 16 Studies
title_fullStr Are Corticosteroids Beneficial for Sepsis and Septic Shock? Based on Pooling Analysis of 16 Studies
title_full_unstemmed Are Corticosteroids Beneficial for Sepsis and Septic Shock? Based on Pooling Analysis of 16 Studies
title_short Are Corticosteroids Beneficial for Sepsis and Septic Shock? Based on Pooling Analysis of 16 Studies
title_sort are corticosteroids beneficial for sepsis and septic shock? based on pooling analysis of 16 studies
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6640176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31354473
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00714
work_keys_str_mv AT yaoyangyang arecorticosteroidsbeneficialforsepsisandsepticshockbasedonpoolinganalysisof16studies
AT linlulu arecorticosteroidsbeneficialforsepsisandsepticshockbasedonpoolinganalysisof16studies
AT guhuiyun arecorticosteroidsbeneficialforsepsisandsepticshockbasedonpoolinganalysisof16studies
AT wujunyi arecorticosteroidsbeneficialforsepsisandsepticshockbasedonpoolinganalysisof16studies
AT niuyuming arecorticosteroidsbeneficialforsepsisandsepticshockbasedonpoolinganalysisof16studies
AT zhangchao arecorticosteroidsbeneficialforsepsisandsepticshockbasedonpoolinganalysisof16studies