Cargando…
Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans
Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) obtained from transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) allow corticospinal excitability (CSE) to be measured in the human primary motor cortex (M1). CSE responses to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocols are highly variable. Here, we tested the reprod...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6640590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31301123 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14087 |
_version_ | 1783436612183523328 |
---|---|
author | Bashir, Shahid Ahmad, Shafiq Alatefi, Moath Hamza, Ali Sharaf, Mohamed Fecteau, Shirely Yoo, Woo Kyoung |
author_facet | Bashir, Shahid Ahmad, Shafiq Alatefi, Moath Hamza, Ali Sharaf, Mohamed Fecteau, Shirely Yoo, Woo Kyoung |
author_sort | Bashir, Shahid |
collection | PubMed |
description | Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) obtained from transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) allow corticospinal excitability (CSE) to be measured in the human primary motor cortex (M1). CSE responses to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocols are highly variable. Here, we tested the reproducibility and reliability of individual MEPs following a common anodal tDCS protocol. In this study, 32 healthy subjects received anodal tDCS stimulation over the left M1 for three durations (tDCS‐T5, tDCS‐T10, and tDCS‐T20 min) on separate days in a crossover‐randomized order. After the resting motor threshold (RMT) was determined for the contralateral first dorsal interosseous muscle, 15 single pulses 4–8 sec apart at an intensity of 120% RMT were delivered to the left M1 to determine the baseline MEP amplitude at T(0), T(5), T(10), T(20), T(30), T(40), T(50), and T(60) min after stimulation for each durations. During TMS delivery, 3D images of the participant's cortex and hot spot were visualized for obtaining MEPs from same position. Our findings revealed that there was a significant MEPs improvement at T(0) (P = 0.01) after 10 min of anodal stimulation. After the 20‐min stimulation duration, MEPs differed specifically at T(0,) T(5,) T(30) min (P < 0.05). This indicates that tDCS is a promising tool to improve MEPs. Our observed variability in response to the tDCS protocol is consistent with other noninvasive brain stimulation studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6640590 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66405902019-07-29 Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans Bashir, Shahid Ahmad, Shafiq Alatefi, Moath Hamza, Ali Sharaf, Mohamed Fecteau, Shirely Yoo, Woo Kyoung Physiol Rep Original Research Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) obtained from transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) allow corticospinal excitability (CSE) to be measured in the human primary motor cortex (M1). CSE responses to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocols are highly variable. Here, we tested the reproducibility and reliability of individual MEPs following a common anodal tDCS protocol. In this study, 32 healthy subjects received anodal tDCS stimulation over the left M1 for three durations (tDCS‐T5, tDCS‐T10, and tDCS‐T20 min) on separate days in a crossover‐randomized order. After the resting motor threshold (RMT) was determined for the contralateral first dorsal interosseous muscle, 15 single pulses 4–8 sec apart at an intensity of 120% RMT were delivered to the left M1 to determine the baseline MEP amplitude at T(0), T(5), T(10), T(20), T(30), T(40), T(50), and T(60) min after stimulation for each durations. During TMS delivery, 3D images of the participant's cortex and hot spot were visualized for obtaining MEPs from same position. Our findings revealed that there was a significant MEPs improvement at T(0) (P = 0.01) after 10 min of anodal stimulation. After the 20‐min stimulation duration, MEPs differed specifically at T(0,) T(5,) T(30) min (P < 0.05). This indicates that tDCS is a promising tool to improve MEPs. Our observed variability in response to the tDCS protocol is consistent with other noninvasive brain stimulation studies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6640590/ /pubmed/31301123 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14087 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Bashir, Shahid Ahmad, Shafiq Alatefi, Moath Hamza, Ali Sharaf, Mohamed Fecteau, Shirely Yoo, Woo Kyoung Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans |
title | Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans |
title_full | Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans |
title_fullStr | Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans |
title_short | Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans |
title_sort | effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6640590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31301123 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14087 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bashirshahid effectsofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonmotorevokedpotentialsvariabilityinhumans AT ahmadshafiq effectsofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonmotorevokedpotentialsvariabilityinhumans AT alatefimoath effectsofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonmotorevokedpotentialsvariabilityinhumans AT hamzaali effectsofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonmotorevokedpotentialsvariabilityinhumans AT sharafmohamed effectsofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonmotorevokedpotentialsvariabilityinhumans AT fecteaushirely effectsofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonmotorevokedpotentialsvariabilityinhumans AT yoowookyoung effectsofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonmotorevokedpotentialsvariabilityinhumans |