Cargando…

Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans

Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) obtained from transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) allow corticospinal excitability (CSE) to be measured in the human primary motor cortex (M1). CSE responses to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocols are highly variable. Here, we tested the reprod...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bashir, Shahid, Ahmad, Shafiq, Alatefi, Moath, Hamza, Ali, Sharaf, Mohamed, Fecteau, Shirely, Yoo, Woo Kyoung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6640590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31301123
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14087
_version_ 1783436612183523328
author Bashir, Shahid
Ahmad, Shafiq
Alatefi, Moath
Hamza, Ali
Sharaf, Mohamed
Fecteau, Shirely
Yoo, Woo Kyoung
author_facet Bashir, Shahid
Ahmad, Shafiq
Alatefi, Moath
Hamza, Ali
Sharaf, Mohamed
Fecteau, Shirely
Yoo, Woo Kyoung
author_sort Bashir, Shahid
collection PubMed
description Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) obtained from transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) allow corticospinal excitability (CSE) to be measured in the human primary motor cortex (M1). CSE responses to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocols are highly variable. Here, we tested the reproducibility and reliability of individual MEPs following a common anodal tDCS protocol. In this study, 32 healthy subjects received anodal tDCS stimulation over the left M1 for three durations (tDCS‐T5, tDCS‐T10, and tDCS‐T20 min) on separate days in a crossover‐randomized order. After the resting motor threshold (RMT) was determined for the contralateral first dorsal interosseous muscle, 15 single pulses 4–8 sec apart at an intensity of 120% RMT were delivered to the left M1 to determine the baseline MEP amplitude at T(0), T(5), T(10), T(20), T(30), T(40), T(50), and T(60) min after stimulation for each durations. During TMS delivery, 3D images of the participant's cortex and hot spot were visualized for obtaining MEPs from same position. Our findings revealed that there was a significant MEPs improvement at T(0) (P = 0.01) after 10 min of anodal stimulation. After the 20‐min stimulation duration, MEPs differed specifically at T(0,) T(5,) T(30) min (P < 0.05). This indicates that tDCS is a promising tool to improve MEPs. Our observed variability in response to the tDCS protocol is consistent with other noninvasive brain stimulation studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6640590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66405902019-07-29 Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans Bashir, Shahid Ahmad, Shafiq Alatefi, Moath Hamza, Ali Sharaf, Mohamed Fecteau, Shirely Yoo, Woo Kyoung Physiol Rep Original Research Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) obtained from transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) allow corticospinal excitability (CSE) to be measured in the human primary motor cortex (M1). CSE responses to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocols are highly variable. Here, we tested the reproducibility and reliability of individual MEPs following a common anodal tDCS protocol. In this study, 32 healthy subjects received anodal tDCS stimulation over the left M1 for three durations (tDCS‐T5, tDCS‐T10, and tDCS‐T20 min) on separate days in a crossover‐randomized order. After the resting motor threshold (RMT) was determined for the contralateral first dorsal interosseous muscle, 15 single pulses 4–8 sec apart at an intensity of 120% RMT were delivered to the left M1 to determine the baseline MEP amplitude at T(0), T(5), T(10), T(20), T(30), T(40), T(50), and T(60) min after stimulation for each durations. During TMS delivery, 3D images of the participant's cortex and hot spot were visualized for obtaining MEPs from same position. Our findings revealed that there was a significant MEPs improvement at T(0) (P = 0.01) after 10 min of anodal stimulation. After the 20‐min stimulation duration, MEPs differed specifically at T(0,) T(5,) T(30) min (P < 0.05). This indicates that tDCS is a promising tool to improve MEPs. Our observed variability in response to the tDCS protocol is consistent with other noninvasive brain stimulation studies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6640590/ /pubmed/31301123 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14087 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Bashir, Shahid
Ahmad, Shafiq
Alatefi, Moath
Hamza, Ali
Sharaf, Mohamed
Fecteau, Shirely
Yoo, Woo Kyoung
Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans
title Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans
title_full Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans
title_fullStr Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans
title_full_unstemmed Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans
title_short Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans
title_sort effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6640590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31301123
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14087
work_keys_str_mv AT bashirshahid effectsofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonmotorevokedpotentialsvariabilityinhumans
AT ahmadshafiq effectsofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonmotorevokedpotentialsvariabilityinhumans
AT alatefimoath effectsofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonmotorevokedpotentialsvariabilityinhumans
AT hamzaali effectsofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonmotorevokedpotentialsvariabilityinhumans
AT sharafmohamed effectsofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonmotorevokedpotentialsvariabilityinhumans
AT fecteaushirely effectsofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonmotorevokedpotentialsvariabilityinhumans
AT yoowookyoung effectsofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonmotorevokedpotentialsvariabilityinhumans