Cargando…
UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series
BACKGROUND: The Concordat to Support Research Integrity published in 2012 recommends that UK research institutions should provide a named point of contact to receive concerns about research integrity (RI). The Concordat also requires institutions to publish annual RI statements. OBJECTIVE: To see wh...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6640619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31341741 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7292 |
_version_ | 1783436614757777408 |
---|---|
author | Wager, Elizabeth |
author_facet | Wager, Elizabeth |
author_sort | Wager, Elizabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Concordat to Support Research Integrity published in 2012 recommends that UK research institutions should provide a named point of contact to receive concerns about research integrity (RI). The Concordat also requires institutions to publish annual RI statements. OBJECTIVE: To see whether contact information for a staff member responsible for RI was readily available from UK university websites and to see how many universities published annual RI statements. METHODS: UK university websites were searched in mid-2012, mid-2014 and mid-2018. The availability of contact details for RI inquiries, other information about RI and, specifically, an annual RI statement, was recorded. RESULTS: The proportion of UK universities publishing an email address for RI inquiries rose from 23% in 2012 (31/134) to 55% in 2018. The same proportion (55%) published at least one annual RI statement in 2018, but only three provided statements for all years from 2012/13. There was great variation in the titles used for the staff member with responsibility for RI which made searching difficult. CONCLUSION: Over 6 years after the publication of the Concordat to Support Research Integrity, nearly half of UK universities are not complying with all its recommendations and do not provide contact details for a staff member with responsibility for RI or an annual statement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6640619 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66406192019-07-24 UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series Wager, Elizabeth PeerJ Ethical Issues BACKGROUND: The Concordat to Support Research Integrity published in 2012 recommends that UK research institutions should provide a named point of contact to receive concerns about research integrity (RI). The Concordat also requires institutions to publish annual RI statements. OBJECTIVE: To see whether contact information for a staff member responsible for RI was readily available from UK university websites and to see how many universities published annual RI statements. METHODS: UK university websites were searched in mid-2012, mid-2014 and mid-2018. The availability of contact details for RI inquiries, other information about RI and, specifically, an annual RI statement, was recorded. RESULTS: The proportion of UK universities publishing an email address for RI inquiries rose from 23% in 2012 (31/134) to 55% in 2018. The same proportion (55%) published at least one annual RI statement in 2018, but only three provided statements for all years from 2012/13. There was great variation in the titles used for the staff member with responsibility for RI which made searching difficult. CONCLUSION: Over 6 years after the publication of the Concordat to Support Research Integrity, nearly half of UK universities are not complying with all its recommendations and do not provide contact details for a staff member with responsibility for RI or an annual statement. PeerJ Inc. 2019-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6640619/ /pubmed/31341741 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7292 Text en ©2019 Wager http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Ethical Issues Wager, Elizabeth UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series |
title | UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series |
title_full | UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series |
title_fullStr | UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series |
title_full_unstemmed | UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series |
title_short | UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series |
title_sort | uk universities compliance with the concordat to support research integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series |
topic | Ethical Issues |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6640619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31341741 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7292 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wagerelizabeth ukuniversitiescompliancewiththeconcordattosupportresearchintegrityfindingsfromcrosssectionaltimeseries |