Cargando…

UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series

BACKGROUND: The Concordat to Support Research Integrity published in 2012 recommends that UK research institutions should provide a named point of contact to receive concerns about research integrity (RI). The Concordat also requires institutions to publish annual RI statements. OBJECTIVE: To see wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Wager, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6640619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31341741
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7292
_version_ 1783436614757777408
author Wager, Elizabeth
author_facet Wager, Elizabeth
author_sort Wager, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Concordat to Support Research Integrity published in 2012 recommends that UK research institutions should provide a named point of contact to receive concerns about research integrity (RI). The Concordat also requires institutions to publish annual RI statements. OBJECTIVE: To see whether contact information for a staff member responsible for RI was readily available from UK university websites and to see how many universities published annual RI statements. METHODS: UK university websites were searched in mid-2012, mid-2014 and mid-2018. The availability of contact details for RI inquiries, other information about RI and, specifically, an annual RI statement, was recorded. RESULTS: The proportion of UK universities publishing an email address for RI inquiries rose from 23% in 2012 (31/134) to 55% in 2018. The same proportion (55%) published at least one annual RI statement in 2018, but only three provided statements for all years from 2012/13. There was great variation in the titles used for the staff member with responsibility for RI which made searching difficult. CONCLUSION: Over 6 years after the publication of the Concordat to Support Research Integrity, nearly half of UK universities are not complying with all its recommendations and do not provide contact details for a staff member with responsibility for RI or an annual statement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6640619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66406192019-07-24 UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series Wager, Elizabeth PeerJ Ethical Issues BACKGROUND: The Concordat to Support Research Integrity published in 2012 recommends that UK research institutions should provide a named point of contact to receive concerns about research integrity (RI). The Concordat also requires institutions to publish annual RI statements. OBJECTIVE: To see whether contact information for a staff member responsible for RI was readily available from UK university websites and to see how many universities published annual RI statements. METHODS: UK university websites were searched in mid-2012, mid-2014 and mid-2018. The availability of contact details for RI inquiries, other information about RI and, specifically, an annual RI statement, was recorded. RESULTS: The proportion of UK universities publishing an email address for RI inquiries rose from 23% in 2012 (31/134) to 55% in 2018. The same proportion (55%) published at least one annual RI statement in 2018, but only three provided statements for all years from 2012/13. There was great variation in the titles used for the staff member with responsibility for RI which made searching difficult. CONCLUSION: Over 6 years after the publication of the Concordat to Support Research Integrity, nearly half of UK universities are not complying with all its recommendations and do not provide contact details for a staff member with responsibility for RI or an annual statement. PeerJ Inc. 2019-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6640619/ /pubmed/31341741 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7292 Text en ©2019 Wager http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Ethical Issues
Wager, Elizabeth
UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series
title UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series
title_full UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series
title_fullStr UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series
title_full_unstemmed UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series
title_short UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series
title_sort uk universities compliance with the concordat to support research integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series
topic Ethical Issues
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6640619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31341741
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7292
work_keys_str_mv AT wagerelizabeth ukuniversitiescompliancewiththeconcordattosupportresearchintegrityfindingsfromcrosssectionaltimeseries