Cargando…
Surface Modification of Polyacrylonitrile Membrane by Chemical Reaction and Physical Coating: Comparison between Static and Pore-Flowing Procedures
[Image: see text] The influences of static and pore-flowing procedures on the surface modification of a polyacrylonitrile (PAN) ultrafiltration membrane through chemical reaction and physical coating were investigated in detail. For chemical modification by ethanolamine, a membrane modified by the p...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2018
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6641343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31458656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b02094 |
_version_ | 1783436759533617152 |
---|---|
author | Qin, Yang Yang, Hu Xu, Zhenliang Li, Feng |
author_facet | Qin, Yang Yang, Hu Xu, Zhenliang Li, Feng |
author_sort | Qin, Yang |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] The influences of static and pore-flowing procedures on the surface modification of a polyacrylonitrile (PAN) ultrafiltration membrane through chemical reaction and physical coating were investigated in detail. For chemical modification by ethanolamine, a membrane modified by the pore-flowing procedure showed a higher flux and different morphology. The reasons were explained by two effects: the pore-flowing resistance to the random thermal motion of PAN at high temperatures and different reaction kinetics related to the reactant concentration profile on the interface between the membrane and reaction solution and the kinetic property of the fluid (driving force and miscibility) and reaction (time and rate). For physical coating modification, a dense and flat layer via a loose and random layer was formed during the pore-flowing process and static process, which changed the flux and antifouling property of the membrane. The membrane prepared by dead-end filtration showed the best trade-off between the flux and antifouling property. Overall, the procedure kinetics plays an important role in the optimization of membrane modification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6641343 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66413432019-08-27 Surface Modification of Polyacrylonitrile Membrane by Chemical Reaction and Physical Coating: Comparison between Static and Pore-Flowing Procedures Qin, Yang Yang, Hu Xu, Zhenliang Li, Feng ACS Omega [Image: see text] The influences of static and pore-flowing procedures on the surface modification of a polyacrylonitrile (PAN) ultrafiltration membrane through chemical reaction and physical coating were investigated in detail. For chemical modification by ethanolamine, a membrane modified by the pore-flowing procedure showed a higher flux and different morphology. The reasons were explained by two effects: the pore-flowing resistance to the random thermal motion of PAN at high temperatures and different reaction kinetics related to the reactant concentration profile on the interface between the membrane and reaction solution and the kinetic property of the fluid (driving force and miscibility) and reaction (time and rate). For physical coating modification, a dense and flat layer via a loose and random layer was formed during the pore-flowing process and static process, which changed the flux and antifouling property of the membrane. The membrane prepared by dead-end filtration showed the best trade-off between the flux and antifouling property. Overall, the procedure kinetics plays an important role in the optimization of membrane modification. American Chemical Society 2018-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6641343/ /pubmed/31458656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b02094 Text en Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Qin, Yang Yang, Hu Xu, Zhenliang Li, Feng Surface Modification of Polyacrylonitrile Membrane by Chemical Reaction and Physical Coating: Comparison between Static and Pore-Flowing Procedures |
title | Surface Modification of Polyacrylonitrile Membrane
by Chemical Reaction and Physical Coating: Comparison between Static
and Pore-Flowing Procedures |
title_full | Surface Modification of Polyacrylonitrile Membrane
by Chemical Reaction and Physical Coating: Comparison between Static
and Pore-Flowing Procedures |
title_fullStr | Surface Modification of Polyacrylonitrile Membrane
by Chemical Reaction and Physical Coating: Comparison between Static
and Pore-Flowing Procedures |
title_full_unstemmed | Surface Modification of Polyacrylonitrile Membrane
by Chemical Reaction and Physical Coating: Comparison between Static
and Pore-Flowing Procedures |
title_short | Surface Modification of Polyacrylonitrile Membrane
by Chemical Reaction and Physical Coating: Comparison between Static
and Pore-Flowing Procedures |
title_sort | surface modification of polyacrylonitrile membrane
by chemical reaction and physical coating: comparison between static
and pore-flowing procedures |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6641343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31458656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b02094 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qinyang surfacemodificationofpolyacrylonitrilemembranebychemicalreactionandphysicalcoatingcomparisonbetweenstaticandporeflowingprocedures AT yanghu surfacemodificationofpolyacrylonitrilemembranebychemicalreactionandphysicalcoatingcomparisonbetweenstaticandporeflowingprocedures AT xuzhenliang surfacemodificationofpolyacrylonitrilemembranebychemicalreactionandphysicalcoatingcomparisonbetweenstaticandporeflowingprocedures AT lifeng surfacemodificationofpolyacrylonitrilemembranebychemicalreactionandphysicalcoatingcomparisonbetweenstaticandporeflowingprocedures |