Cargando…

Surface Modification of Polyacrylonitrile Membrane by Chemical Reaction and Physical Coating: Comparison between Static and Pore-Flowing Procedures

[Image: see text] The influences of static and pore-flowing procedures on the surface modification of a polyacrylonitrile (PAN) ultrafiltration membrane through chemical reaction and physical coating were investigated in detail. For chemical modification by ethanolamine, a membrane modified by the p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qin, Yang, Yang, Hu, Xu, Zhenliang, Li, Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6641343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31458656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b02094
_version_ 1783436759533617152
author Qin, Yang
Yang, Hu
Xu, Zhenliang
Li, Feng
author_facet Qin, Yang
Yang, Hu
Xu, Zhenliang
Li, Feng
author_sort Qin, Yang
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The influences of static and pore-flowing procedures on the surface modification of a polyacrylonitrile (PAN) ultrafiltration membrane through chemical reaction and physical coating were investigated in detail. For chemical modification by ethanolamine, a membrane modified by the pore-flowing procedure showed a higher flux and different morphology. The reasons were explained by two effects: the pore-flowing resistance to the random thermal motion of PAN at high temperatures and different reaction kinetics related to the reactant concentration profile on the interface between the membrane and reaction solution and the kinetic property of the fluid (driving force and miscibility) and reaction (time and rate). For physical coating modification, a dense and flat layer via a loose and random layer was formed during the pore-flowing process and static process, which changed the flux and antifouling property of the membrane. The membrane prepared by dead-end filtration showed the best trade-off between the flux and antifouling property. Overall, the procedure kinetics plays an important role in the optimization of membrane modification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6641343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66413432019-08-27 Surface Modification of Polyacrylonitrile Membrane by Chemical Reaction and Physical Coating: Comparison between Static and Pore-Flowing Procedures Qin, Yang Yang, Hu Xu, Zhenliang Li, Feng ACS Omega [Image: see text] The influences of static and pore-flowing procedures on the surface modification of a polyacrylonitrile (PAN) ultrafiltration membrane through chemical reaction and physical coating were investigated in detail. For chemical modification by ethanolamine, a membrane modified by the pore-flowing procedure showed a higher flux and different morphology. The reasons were explained by two effects: the pore-flowing resistance to the random thermal motion of PAN at high temperatures and different reaction kinetics related to the reactant concentration profile on the interface between the membrane and reaction solution and the kinetic property of the fluid (driving force and miscibility) and reaction (time and rate). For physical coating modification, a dense and flat layer via a loose and random layer was formed during the pore-flowing process and static process, which changed the flux and antifouling property of the membrane. The membrane prepared by dead-end filtration showed the best trade-off between the flux and antifouling property. Overall, the procedure kinetics plays an important role in the optimization of membrane modification. American Chemical Society 2018-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6641343/ /pubmed/31458656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b02094 Text en Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Qin, Yang
Yang, Hu
Xu, Zhenliang
Li, Feng
Surface Modification of Polyacrylonitrile Membrane by Chemical Reaction and Physical Coating: Comparison between Static and Pore-Flowing Procedures
title Surface Modification of Polyacrylonitrile Membrane by Chemical Reaction and Physical Coating: Comparison between Static and Pore-Flowing Procedures
title_full Surface Modification of Polyacrylonitrile Membrane by Chemical Reaction and Physical Coating: Comparison between Static and Pore-Flowing Procedures
title_fullStr Surface Modification of Polyacrylonitrile Membrane by Chemical Reaction and Physical Coating: Comparison between Static and Pore-Flowing Procedures
title_full_unstemmed Surface Modification of Polyacrylonitrile Membrane by Chemical Reaction and Physical Coating: Comparison between Static and Pore-Flowing Procedures
title_short Surface Modification of Polyacrylonitrile Membrane by Chemical Reaction and Physical Coating: Comparison between Static and Pore-Flowing Procedures
title_sort surface modification of polyacrylonitrile membrane by chemical reaction and physical coating: comparison between static and pore-flowing procedures
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6641343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31458656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b02094
work_keys_str_mv AT qinyang surfacemodificationofpolyacrylonitrilemembranebychemicalreactionandphysicalcoatingcomparisonbetweenstaticandporeflowingprocedures
AT yanghu surfacemodificationofpolyacrylonitrilemembranebychemicalreactionandphysicalcoatingcomparisonbetweenstaticandporeflowingprocedures
AT xuzhenliang surfacemodificationofpolyacrylonitrilemembranebychemicalreactionandphysicalcoatingcomparisonbetweenstaticandporeflowingprocedures
AT lifeng surfacemodificationofpolyacrylonitrilemembranebychemicalreactionandphysicalcoatingcomparisonbetweenstaticandporeflowingprocedures