Cargando…
TiO(2)-Doped CeO(2) Nanorod Catalyst for Direct Conversion of CO(2) and CH(3)OH to Dimethyl Carbonate: Catalytic Performance and Kinetic Study
[Image: see text] A new class of TiO(2)-doped CeO(2) nanorods was synthesized via a modified hydrothermal method, and these nanorods were first used as catalysts for the direct synthesis of dimethyl carbonate (DMC) from CO(2) and CH(3)OH in a fixed-bed reactor. The micromorphologies and physical–che...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2018
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6641393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31457888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b01475 |
Sumario: | [Image: see text] A new class of TiO(2)-doped CeO(2) nanorods was synthesized via a modified hydrothermal method, and these nanorods were first used as catalysts for the direct synthesis of dimethyl carbonate (DMC) from CO(2) and CH(3)OH in a fixed-bed reactor. The micromorphologies and physical–chemical properties of nanorods were characterized by transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, N(2) adsorption, inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and temperature-programmed desorption of ammonia and carbon dioxide (NH(3)-TPD and CO(2)-TPD). The effects of the TiO(2) doping ratio on the catalytic performances were fully investigated. By doping TiO(2), the surface acid–base sites of CeO(2) nanorods can be obviously promoted and the catalytic activity can be raised evidently. Ti(0.04)Ce(0.96)O(2) nanorod catalysts exhibited remarkably high activity with a methanol conversion of 5.38% with DMC selectivity of 83.1%. Furthermore, kinetic and mechanistic investigations based on the initial rate method were conducted. Over the Ti(0.04)Ce(0.96)O(2) nanorod catalyst, the apparent activation energy of the reaction was 46.3 kJ/mol. The reaction rate law was determined to be of positive first-order to the CO(2) concentration and the catalyst loading amount. These results were practically identical with the prediction of the Langmuir–Hinshelwood mechanism in which the steps of CO(2) adsorption and activation are considered as rate-determining steps. |
---|