Cargando…

Comparison of the Binding Geometry of Free-Base and Hexacoordinated Cationic Porphyrins to A- and B-Form DNA

[Image: see text] Although the transition from B-DNA to the A-form is essential for many biological concerns, the properties of this transition have not been resolved. The B to A equilibrium can be analyzed conveniently because of the significant changes in circular dichroism (CD) and absorption spe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oh, Ye Sol, Jung, Maeng-Joon, Kim, Seog K., Lee, Young-Ae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6641412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31457967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b01629
_version_ 1783436775616675840
author Oh, Ye Sol
Jung, Maeng-Joon
Kim, Seog K.
Lee, Young-Ae
author_facet Oh, Ye Sol
Jung, Maeng-Joon
Kim, Seog K.
Lee, Young-Ae
author_sort Oh, Ye Sol
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Although the transition from B-DNA to the A-form is essential for many biological concerns, the properties of this transition have not been resolved. The B to A equilibrium can be analyzed conveniently because of the significant changes in circular dichroism (CD) and absorption spectrum. CD and linear dichroism (LD) methods were used to examine the binding of water-soluble meso-tetrakis(N-methylpyridinium-4-yl)porphyrin (TMPyP) and its derivatives, Co-TMPyP, with B- and A-calf thymus DNA. B- to A-transitions occurred when the physiological buffer was replaced with a water-ethanol mixture (∼80 v/v %), and the fluorescence emission spectra of TMPyP bound to DNA showed a different pattern under ethanol–water conditions and water alone. The featureless broad emission bands of TMPyP were split into two peaks near at 658 and 715 nm in the presence of DNA under an aqueous solution. In the case of an ethanol–water system, however, the emission bands are split in two peaks near at 648 and 708 nm and 656 and 715 nm with and without DNA, respectively. This may be due to a change in the solution polarity. On the basis of the CD and LD data, TMPyP interacts with B-DNA via intercalation at a low ratio under a low ionic strength, 1 mM sodium phosphate. On the other hand, the interaction with A-DNA (80 v/v % ethanol–water system) occurs in a nonintercalating manner. This difference might be because the structural conformations, such as the groove of A-DNA, are not as deep as in B-DNA and the bases are much more tilted. In the case of Co-TMPyP, porphyrin binds preferably via an outside self-stacking mode with B- and A-DNA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6641412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66414122019-08-27 Comparison of the Binding Geometry of Free-Base and Hexacoordinated Cationic Porphyrins to A- and B-Form DNA Oh, Ye Sol Jung, Maeng-Joon Kim, Seog K. Lee, Young-Ae ACS Omega [Image: see text] Although the transition from B-DNA to the A-form is essential for many biological concerns, the properties of this transition have not been resolved. The B to A equilibrium can be analyzed conveniently because of the significant changes in circular dichroism (CD) and absorption spectrum. CD and linear dichroism (LD) methods were used to examine the binding of water-soluble meso-tetrakis(N-methylpyridinium-4-yl)porphyrin (TMPyP) and its derivatives, Co-TMPyP, with B- and A-calf thymus DNA. B- to A-transitions occurred when the physiological buffer was replaced with a water-ethanol mixture (∼80 v/v %), and the fluorescence emission spectra of TMPyP bound to DNA showed a different pattern under ethanol–water conditions and water alone. The featureless broad emission bands of TMPyP were split into two peaks near at 658 and 715 nm in the presence of DNA under an aqueous solution. In the case of an ethanol–water system, however, the emission bands are split in two peaks near at 648 and 708 nm and 656 and 715 nm with and without DNA, respectively. This may be due to a change in the solution polarity. On the basis of the CD and LD data, TMPyP interacts with B-DNA via intercalation at a low ratio under a low ionic strength, 1 mM sodium phosphate. On the other hand, the interaction with A-DNA (80 v/v % ethanol–water system) occurs in a nonintercalating manner. This difference might be because the structural conformations, such as the groove of A-DNA, are not as deep as in B-DNA and the bases are much more tilted. In the case of Co-TMPyP, porphyrin binds preferably via an outside self-stacking mode with B- and A-DNA. American Chemical Society 2018-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6641412/ /pubmed/31457967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b01629 Text en Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Oh, Ye Sol
Jung, Maeng-Joon
Kim, Seog K.
Lee, Young-Ae
Comparison of the Binding Geometry of Free-Base and Hexacoordinated Cationic Porphyrins to A- and B-Form DNA
title Comparison of the Binding Geometry of Free-Base and Hexacoordinated Cationic Porphyrins to A- and B-Form DNA
title_full Comparison of the Binding Geometry of Free-Base and Hexacoordinated Cationic Porphyrins to A- and B-Form DNA
title_fullStr Comparison of the Binding Geometry of Free-Base and Hexacoordinated Cationic Porphyrins to A- and B-Form DNA
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Binding Geometry of Free-Base and Hexacoordinated Cationic Porphyrins to A- and B-Form DNA
title_short Comparison of the Binding Geometry of Free-Base and Hexacoordinated Cationic Porphyrins to A- and B-Form DNA
title_sort comparison of the binding geometry of free-base and hexacoordinated cationic porphyrins to a- and b-form dna
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6641412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31457967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b01629
work_keys_str_mv AT ohyesol comparisonofthebindinggeometryoffreebaseandhexacoordinatedcationicporphyrinstoaandbformdna
AT jungmaengjoon comparisonofthebindinggeometryoffreebaseandhexacoordinatedcationicporphyrinstoaandbformdna
AT kimseogk comparisonofthebindinggeometryoffreebaseandhexacoordinatedcationicporphyrinstoaandbformdna
AT leeyoungae comparisonofthebindinggeometryoffreebaseandhexacoordinatedcationicporphyrinstoaandbformdna