Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of Circulating Noncoding RNAs Versus Protein Biomarkers in the Detection of Myocardial Injury

RATIONALE: Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), including microRNAs (miRNAs), circular RNAs (circRNAs), and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), are proposed novel biomarkers of myocardial injury. Their release kinetics have not been explored without confounding by heparin nor has their relationship to myocardial pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schulte, Christian, Barwari, Temo, Joshi, Abhishek, Theofilatos, Konstantinos, Zampetaki, Anna, Barallobre-Barreiro, Javier, Singh, Bhawana, Sörensen, Nils A., Neumann, Johannes T., Zeller, Tanja, Westermann, Dirk, Blankenberg, Stefan, Marber, Michael, Liebetrau, Christoph, Mayr, Manuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6641471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31159652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.314937
_version_ 1783436789522890752
author Schulte, Christian
Barwari, Temo
Joshi, Abhishek
Theofilatos, Konstantinos
Zampetaki, Anna
Barallobre-Barreiro, Javier
Singh, Bhawana
Sörensen, Nils A.
Neumann, Johannes T.
Zeller, Tanja
Westermann, Dirk
Blankenberg, Stefan
Marber, Michael
Liebetrau, Christoph
Mayr, Manuel
author_facet Schulte, Christian
Barwari, Temo
Joshi, Abhishek
Theofilatos, Konstantinos
Zampetaki, Anna
Barallobre-Barreiro, Javier
Singh, Bhawana
Sörensen, Nils A.
Neumann, Johannes T.
Zeller, Tanja
Westermann, Dirk
Blankenberg, Stefan
Marber, Michael
Liebetrau, Christoph
Mayr, Manuel
author_sort Schulte, Christian
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), including microRNAs (miRNAs), circular RNAs (circRNAs), and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), are proposed novel biomarkers of myocardial injury. Their release kinetics have not been explored without confounding by heparin nor has their relationship to myocardial protein biomarkers. OBJECTIVE: To compare ncRNA types in heparinase-treated samples with established and emerging protein biomarkers for myocardial injury. METHODS AND RESULTS: Screening of 158 circRNAs and 21 lncRNAs in human cardiac tissue identified 12 circRNAs and 11 lncRNAs as potential biomarkers with cardiac origin. Eleven miRNAs were included. At low spike-in concentrations of myocardial tissue, significantly higher regression coefficients were observed across ncRNA types compared with cardiac troponins and cMyBP-C (cardiac myosin-binding protein C). Heparinase treatment of serial plasma and serum samples of patients undergoing transcoronary ablation of septal hypertrophy removed spurious correlations between miRNAs in non-heparinase-treated samples. After transcoronary ablation of septal hypertrophy, muscle-enriched miRNAs (miR-1 and miR-133a) showed a steeper and earlier increase than cardiac-enriched miRNAs (miR-499 and miR-208b). Putative cardiac lncRNAs, including LIPCAR (long intergenic noncoding RNA predicting cardiac remodeling and survival), did not rise, refuting a predominant cardiac origin. Cardiac circRNAs remained largely undetectable. In a validation cohort of acute myocardial infarction, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed noninferiority of cardiac-enriched miRNAs, but miRNAs failed to identify cases presenting with low troponin values. cMyBP-C was validated as a biomarker with highly sensitive properties, and the combination of muscle-enriched miRNAs with high-sensitive cardiac troponin T and cMyBP-C returned the highest area under the curve values. CONCLUSIONS: In a comparative assessment of ncRNAs and protein biomarkers for myocardial injury, cMyBP-C showed properties as the most sensitive cardiac biomarker while miRNAs emerged as promising candidates to integrate ncRNAs with protein biomarkers. Sensitivity of current miRNA detection is inferior to cardiac proteins but a multibiomarker combination of muscle-enriched miRNAs with cMyBP-C and cardiac troponins could open a new path of integrating complementary characteristics of different biomarker types.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6641471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66414712019-09-16 Comparative Analysis of Circulating Noncoding RNAs Versus Protein Biomarkers in the Detection of Myocardial Injury Schulte, Christian Barwari, Temo Joshi, Abhishek Theofilatos, Konstantinos Zampetaki, Anna Barallobre-Barreiro, Javier Singh, Bhawana Sörensen, Nils A. Neumann, Johannes T. Zeller, Tanja Westermann, Dirk Blankenberg, Stefan Marber, Michael Liebetrau, Christoph Mayr, Manuel Circ Res Original Research RATIONALE: Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), including microRNAs (miRNAs), circular RNAs (circRNAs), and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), are proposed novel biomarkers of myocardial injury. Their release kinetics have not been explored without confounding by heparin nor has their relationship to myocardial protein biomarkers. OBJECTIVE: To compare ncRNA types in heparinase-treated samples with established and emerging protein biomarkers for myocardial injury. METHODS AND RESULTS: Screening of 158 circRNAs and 21 lncRNAs in human cardiac tissue identified 12 circRNAs and 11 lncRNAs as potential biomarkers with cardiac origin. Eleven miRNAs were included. At low spike-in concentrations of myocardial tissue, significantly higher regression coefficients were observed across ncRNA types compared with cardiac troponins and cMyBP-C (cardiac myosin-binding protein C). Heparinase treatment of serial plasma and serum samples of patients undergoing transcoronary ablation of septal hypertrophy removed spurious correlations between miRNAs in non-heparinase-treated samples. After transcoronary ablation of septal hypertrophy, muscle-enriched miRNAs (miR-1 and miR-133a) showed a steeper and earlier increase than cardiac-enriched miRNAs (miR-499 and miR-208b). Putative cardiac lncRNAs, including LIPCAR (long intergenic noncoding RNA predicting cardiac remodeling and survival), did not rise, refuting a predominant cardiac origin. Cardiac circRNAs remained largely undetectable. In a validation cohort of acute myocardial infarction, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed noninferiority of cardiac-enriched miRNAs, but miRNAs failed to identify cases presenting with low troponin values. cMyBP-C was validated as a biomarker with highly sensitive properties, and the combination of muscle-enriched miRNAs with high-sensitive cardiac troponin T and cMyBP-C returned the highest area under the curve values. CONCLUSIONS: In a comparative assessment of ncRNAs and protein biomarkers for myocardial injury, cMyBP-C showed properties as the most sensitive cardiac biomarker while miRNAs emerged as promising candidates to integrate ncRNAs with protein biomarkers. Sensitivity of current miRNA detection is inferior to cardiac proteins but a multibiomarker combination of muscle-enriched miRNAs with cMyBP-C and cardiac troponins could open a new path of integrating complementary characteristics of different biomarker types. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019-07-19 2019-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6641471/ /pubmed/31159652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.314937 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Circulation Research is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Schulte, Christian
Barwari, Temo
Joshi, Abhishek
Theofilatos, Konstantinos
Zampetaki, Anna
Barallobre-Barreiro, Javier
Singh, Bhawana
Sörensen, Nils A.
Neumann, Johannes T.
Zeller, Tanja
Westermann, Dirk
Blankenberg, Stefan
Marber, Michael
Liebetrau, Christoph
Mayr, Manuel
Comparative Analysis of Circulating Noncoding RNAs Versus Protein Biomarkers in the Detection of Myocardial Injury
title Comparative Analysis of Circulating Noncoding RNAs Versus Protein Biomarkers in the Detection of Myocardial Injury
title_full Comparative Analysis of Circulating Noncoding RNAs Versus Protein Biomarkers in the Detection of Myocardial Injury
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Circulating Noncoding RNAs Versus Protein Biomarkers in the Detection of Myocardial Injury
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Circulating Noncoding RNAs Versus Protein Biomarkers in the Detection of Myocardial Injury
title_short Comparative Analysis of Circulating Noncoding RNAs Versus Protein Biomarkers in the Detection of Myocardial Injury
title_sort comparative analysis of circulating noncoding rnas versus protein biomarkers in the detection of myocardial injury
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6641471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31159652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.314937
work_keys_str_mv AT schultechristian comparativeanalysisofcirculatingnoncodingrnasversusproteinbiomarkersinthedetectionofmyocardialinjury
AT barwaritemo comparativeanalysisofcirculatingnoncodingrnasversusproteinbiomarkersinthedetectionofmyocardialinjury
AT joshiabhishek comparativeanalysisofcirculatingnoncodingrnasversusproteinbiomarkersinthedetectionofmyocardialinjury
AT theofilatoskonstantinos comparativeanalysisofcirculatingnoncodingrnasversusproteinbiomarkersinthedetectionofmyocardialinjury
AT zampetakianna comparativeanalysisofcirculatingnoncodingrnasversusproteinbiomarkersinthedetectionofmyocardialinjury
AT barallobrebarreirojavier comparativeanalysisofcirculatingnoncodingrnasversusproteinbiomarkersinthedetectionofmyocardialinjury
AT singhbhawana comparativeanalysisofcirculatingnoncodingrnasversusproteinbiomarkersinthedetectionofmyocardialinjury
AT sorensennilsa comparativeanalysisofcirculatingnoncodingrnasversusproteinbiomarkersinthedetectionofmyocardialinjury
AT neumannjohannest comparativeanalysisofcirculatingnoncodingrnasversusproteinbiomarkersinthedetectionofmyocardialinjury
AT zellertanja comparativeanalysisofcirculatingnoncodingrnasversusproteinbiomarkersinthedetectionofmyocardialinjury
AT westermanndirk comparativeanalysisofcirculatingnoncodingrnasversusproteinbiomarkersinthedetectionofmyocardialinjury
AT blankenbergstefan comparativeanalysisofcirculatingnoncodingrnasversusproteinbiomarkersinthedetectionofmyocardialinjury
AT marbermichael comparativeanalysisofcirculatingnoncodingrnasversusproteinbiomarkersinthedetectionofmyocardialinjury
AT liebetrauchristoph comparativeanalysisofcirculatingnoncodingrnasversusproteinbiomarkersinthedetectionofmyocardialinjury
AT mayrmanuel comparativeanalysisofcirculatingnoncodingrnasversusproteinbiomarkersinthedetectionofmyocardialinjury