Cargando…
Clinical significance of serum IGFBP‐3 in colorectal cancer
BACKGROUND: IGF‐binding protein 3(IGFBP‐3)has previously been identified as tumor marker. The present study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of serum IGFBP‐3 in colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Serum was collected from 70 CRC patients and 50 healthy volunteer controls. Serum IGFBP‐3 a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6642311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31218761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.22912 |
_version_ | 1783436956005302272 |
---|---|
author | Hou, Yu‐Lei Luo, Peng Ji, Guang‐yan Chen, Hui |
author_facet | Hou, Yu‐Lei Luo, Peng Ji, Guang‐yan Chen, Hui |
author_sort | Hou, Yu‐Lei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: IGF‐binding protein 3(IGFBP‐3)has previously been identified as tumor marker. The present study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of serum IGFBP‐3 in colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Serum was collected from 70 CRC patients and 50 healthy volunteer controls. Serum IGFBP‐3 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were measured using electrogenerated chemiluminescence immunoassay and compared between groups. Relationships between serum IGFBP‐3 level and the clinical characteristics of CRC were also analyzed. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to investigate diagnostic efficacy of serum IGFBP‐3 and CEA, respectively, for CRC. Data were analyzed using SPSS 13.0. RESULTS: Serum IGFBP‐3 levels in CRC were lower than those of controls (4.68 [3.56, 5.77] vs 5.44 [4.77, 6.10] µg/mL, P < 0.05). Furthermore, serum IGFBP‐3 levels were higher in early cancer stages (I and II) than those of advanced stages (III and IV) (4.78 [3.92, 5.49] vs 3.77 [2.65, 4.59] µg/mL, P < 0.05). In addition, patients with lymph node metastasis absent had elevated serum IGFBP‐3 levels than those of patients with lymph node metastasis present (4.73 [3.92, 5.72] vs 4.11 [2.45, 4.83] µg/mL, P = 0.02). Finally, ROC curve indicated that serum IGFBP‐3 had a better diagnostic power for CRC than CEA. When serum IGFBP‐3 and carcinoembryonic antigen were used together to detect CRC, the AUC was 0.949, with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 90%. CONCLUSIONS: Serum IGFBP‐3 might be a potential biomarker for CRC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6642311 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66423112019-11-12 Clinical significance of serum IGFBP‐3 in colorectal cancer Hou, Yu‐Lei Luo, Peng Ji, Guang‐yan Chen, Hui J Clin Lab Anal Research Articles BACKGROUND: IGF‐binding protein 3(IGFBP‐3)has previously been identified as tumor marker. The present study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of serum IGFBP‐3 in colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Serum was collected from 70 CRC patients and 50 healthy volunteer controls. Serum IGFBP‐3 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were measured using electrogenerated chemiluminescence immunoassay and compared between groups. Relationships between serum IGFBP‐3 level and the clinical characteristics of CRC were also analyzed. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to investigate diagnostic efficacy of serum IGFBP‐3 and CEA, respectively, for CRC. Data were analyzed using SPSS 13.0. RESULTS: Serum IGFBP‐3 levels in CRC were lower than those of controls (4.68 [3.56, 5.77] vs 5.44 [4.77, 6.10] µg/mL, P < 0.05). Furthermore, serum IGFBP‐3 levels were higher in early cancer stages (I and II) than those of advanced stages (III and IV) (4.78 [3.92, 5.49] vs 3.77 [2.65, 4.59] µg/mL, P < 0.05). In addition, patients with lymph node metastasis absent had elevated serum IGFBP‐3 levels than those of patients with lymph node metastasis present (4.73 [3.92, 5.72] vs 4.11 [2.45, 4.83] µg/mL, P = 0.02). Finally, ROC curve indicated that serum IGFBP‐3 had a better diagnostic power for CRC than CEA. When serum IGFBP‐3 and carcinoembryonic antigen were used together to detect CRC, the AUC was 0.949, with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 90%. CONCLUSIONS: Serum IGFBP‐3 might be a potential biomarker for CRC. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6642311/ /pubmed/31218761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.22912 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Hou, Yu‐Lei Luo, Peng Ji, Guang‐yan Chen, Hui Clinical significance of serum IGFBP‐3 in colorectal cancer |
title | Clinical significance of serum IGFBP‐3 in colorectal cancer |
title_full | Clinical significance of serum IGFBP‐3 in colorectal cancer |
title_fullStr | Clinical significance of serum IGFBP‐3 in colorectal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical significance of serum IGFBP‐3 in colorectal cancer |
title_short | Clinical significance of serum IGFBP‐3 in colorectal cancer |
title_sort | clinical significance of serum igfbp‐3 in colorectal cancer |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6642311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31218761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.22912 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT houyulei clinicalsignificanceofserumigfbp3incolorectalcancer AT luopeng clinicalsignificanceofserumigfbp3incolorectalcancer AT jiguangyan clinicalsignificanceofserumigfbp3incolorectalcancer AT chenhui clinicalsignificanceofserumigfbp3incolorectalcancer |