Cargando…

Clinical significance of serum IGFBP‐3 in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: IGF‐binding protein 3(IGFBP‐3)has previously been identified as tumor marker. The present study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of serum IGFBP‐3 in colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Serum was collected from 70 CRC patients and 50 healthy volunteer controls. Serum IGFBP‐3 a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hou, Yu‐Lei, Luo, Peng, Ji, Guang‐yan, Chen, Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6642311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31218761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.22912
_version_ 1783436956005302272
author Hou, Yu‐Lei
Luo, Peng
Ji, Guang‐yan
Chen, Hui
author_facet Hou, Yu‐Lei
Luo, Peng
Ji, Guang‐yan
Chen, Hui
author_sort Hou, Yu‐Lei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: IGF‐binding protein 3(IGFBP‐3)has previously been identified as tumor marker. The present study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of serum IGFBP‐3 in colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Serum was collected from 70 CRC patients and 50 healthy volunteer controls. Serum IGFBP‐3 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were measured using electrogenerated chemiluminescence immunoassay and compared between groups. Relationships between serum IGFBP‐3 level and the clinical characteristics of CRC were also analyzed. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to investigate diagnostic efficacy of serum IGFBP‐3 and CEA, respectively, for CRC. Data were analyzed using SPSS 13.0. RESULTS: Serum IGFBP‐3 levels in CRC were lower than those of controls (4.68 [3.56, 5.77] vs 5.44 [4.77, 6.10] µg/mL, P < 0.05). Furthermore, serum IGFBP‐3 levels were higher in early cancer stages (I and II) than those of advanced stages (III and IV) (4.78 [3.92, 5.49] vs 3.77 [2.65, 4.59] µg/mL, P < 0.05). In addition, patients with lymph node metastasis absent had elevated serum IGFBP‐3 levels than those of patients with lymph node metastasis present (4.73 [3.92, 5.72] vs 4.11 [2.45, 4.83] µg/mL, P = 0.02). Finally, ROC curve indicated that serum IGFBP‐3 had a better diagnostic power for CRC than CEA. When serum IGFBP‐3 and carcinoembryonic antigen were used together to detect CRC, the AUC was 0.949, with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 90%. CONCLUSIONS: Serum IGFBP‐3 might be a potential biomarker for CRC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6642311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66423112019-11-12 Clinical significance of serum IGFBP‐3 in colorectal cancer Hou, Yu‐Lei Luo, Peng Ji, Guang‐yan Chen, Hui J Clin Lab Anal Research Articles BACKGROUND: IGF‐binding protein 3(IGFBP‐3)has previously been identified as tumor marker. The present study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of serum IGFBP‐3 in colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Serum was collected from 70 CRC patients and 50 healthy volunteer controls. Serum IGFBP‐3 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were measured using electrogenerated chemiluminescence immunoassay and compared between groups. Relationships between serum IGFBP‐3 level and the clinical characteristics of CRC were also analyzed. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to investigate diagnostic efficacy of serum IGFBP‐3 and CEA, respectively, for CRC. Data were analyzed using SPSS 13.0. RESULTS: Serum IGFBP‐3 levels in CRC were lower than those of controls (4.68 [3.56, 5.77] vs 5.44 [4.77, 6.10] µg/mL, P < 0.05). Furthermore, serum IGFBP‐3 levels were higher in early cancer stages (I and II) than those of advanced stages (III and IV) (4.78 [3.92, 5.49] vs 3.77 [2.65, 4.59] µg/mL, P < 0.05). In addition, patients with lymph node metastasis absent had elevated serum IGFBP‐3 levels than those of patients with lymph node metastasis present (4.73 [3.92, 5.72] vs 4.11 [2.45, 4.83] µg/mL, P = 0.02). Finally, ROC curve indicated that serum IGFBP‐3 had a better diagnostic power for CRC than CEA. When serum IGFBP‐3 and carcinoembryonic antigen were used together to detect CRC, the AUC was 0.949, with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 90%. CONCLUSIONS: Serum IGFBP‐3 might be a potential biomarker for CRC. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6642311/ /pubmed/31218761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.22912 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Hou, Yu‐Lei
Luo, Peng
Ji, Guang‐yan
Chen, Hui
Clinical significance of serum IGFBP‐3 in colorectal cancer
title Clinical significance of serum IGFBP‐3 in colorectal cancer
title_full Clinical significance of serum IGFBP‐3 in colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Clinical significance of serum IGFBP‐3 in colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Clinical significance of serum IGFBP‐3 in colorectal cancer
title_short Clinical significance of serum IGFBP‐3 in colorectal cancer
title_sort clinical significance of serum igfbp‐3 in colorectal cancer
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6642311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31218761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.22912
work_keys_str_mv AT houyulei clinicalsignificanceofserumigfbp3incolorectalcancer
AT luopeng clinicalsignificanceofserumigfbp3incolorectalcancer
AT jiguangyan clinicalsignificanceofserumigfbp3incolorectalcancer
AT chenhui clinicalsignificanceofserumigfbp3incolorectalcancer