Cargando…
Maternal immunization in Malawi: A mixed methods study of community perceptions, programmatic considerations, and recommendations for future planning
BACKGROUND: Safe, effective vaccines are given to pregnant women to protect their infants and/or themselves against certain infectious agents; however, apart from tetanus vaccination, maternal immunization in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains low. Tetanus toxoid vaccine is integrated...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6642336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31319932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.020 |
_version_ | 1783436961424343040 |
---|---|
author | Fleming, Jessica A. Munthali, Alister Ngwira, Bagrey Kadzandira, John Jamili-Phiri, Monica Ortiz, Justin R. Lambach, Philipp Hombach, Joachim Neuzil, Kathleen M. Stepanchak, Maria Bhat, Niranjan |
author_facet | Fleming, Jessica A. Munthali, Alister Ngwira, Bagrey Kadzandira, John Jamili-Phiri, Monica Ortiz, Justin R. Lambach, Philipp Hombach, Joachim Neuzil, Kathleen M. Stepanchak, Maria Bhat, Niranjan |
author_sort | Fleming, Jessica A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Safe, effective vaccines are given to pregnant women to protect their infants and/or themselves against certain infectious agents; however, apart from tetanus vaccination, maternal immunization in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains low. Tetanus toxoid vaccine is integrated into antenatal care services in Malawi with high coverage and provides an opportunity to identify factors that facilitate successful immunization delivery to pregnant women in LMICs. METHODS: PATH and the University of Malawi’s Centre for Social Research conducted a mixed-methods study in 2015 to document community perceptions of maternal immunization, using tetanus vaccine as an example, and to identify factors perceived to be important to successfully introducing other maternal vaccines, such as influenza vaccine, in Malawi. We conducted 18 focus group discussions with pregnant and recently pregnant women and their family members and 76 semi-structured interviews with pregnant and recently pregnant women, community leaders, health workers, public health program managers, non-governmental partners, and policy makers. RESULTS: We identified factors perceived to support the introduction of new maternal vaccines, including strong maternal vaccine acceptance in the community, an existing strategy for maternal tetanus vaccine delivery, and positive health workers’ views about the introduction of additional maternal vaccines. Potential challenges to adoption and acceptance included identifying and tracking the target population and monitoring adverse events, and the need to ensure operational capacity of the health system to support the introduction and wide-scale use of an additional vaccine. For influenza vaccine specifically, additional challenges included limited awareness of influenza disease and its low prioritization among health needs. CONCLUSIONS: Lessons from the successful delivery of maternal tetanus immunization in Malawi may be informative for similar countries considering new vaccines for pregnant women or striving to optimize the delivery of those currently provided. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6642336 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66423362019-07-29 Maternal immunization in Malawi: A mixed methods study of community perceptions, programmatic considerations, and recommendations for future planning Fleming, Jessica A. Munthali, Alister Ngwira, Bagrey Kadzandira, John Jamili-Phiri, Monica Ortiz, Justin R. Lambach, Philipp Hombach, Joachim Neuzil, Kathleen M. Stepanchak, Maria Bhat, Niranjan Vaccine Article BACKGROUND: Safe, effective vaccines are given to pregnant women to protect their infants and/or themselves against certain infectious agents; however, apart from tetanus vaccination, maternal immunization in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains low. Tetanus toxoid vaccine is integrated into antenatal care services in Malawi with high coverage and provides an opportunity to identify factors that facilitate successful immunization delivery to pregnant women in LMICs. METHODS: PATH and the University of Malawi’s Centre for Social Research conducted a mixed-methods study in 2015 to document community perceptions of maternal immunization, using tetanus vaccine as an example, and to identify factors perceived to be important to successfully introducing other maternal vaccines, such as influenza vaccine, in Malawi. We conducted 18 focus group discussions with pregnant and recently pregnant women and their family members and 76 semi-structured interviews with pregnant and recently pregnant women, community leaders, health workers, public health program managers, non-governmental partners, and policy makers. RESULTS: We identified factors perceived to support the introduction of new maternal vaccines, including strong maternal vaccine acceptance in the community, an existing strategy for maternal tetanus vaccine delivery, and positive health workers’ views about the introduction of additional maternal vaccines. Potential challenges to adoption and acceptance included identifying and tracking the target population and monitoring adverse events, and the need to ensure operational capacity of the health system to support the introduction and wide-scale use of an additional vaccine. For influenza vaccine specifically, additional challenges included limited awareness of influenza disease and its low prioritization among health needs. CONCLUSIONS: Lessons from the successful delivery of maternal tetanus immunization in Malawi may be informative for similar countries considering new vaccines for pregnant women or striving to optimize the delivery of those currently provided. Elsevier Science 2019-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6642336/ /pubmed/31319932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.020 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Fleming, Jessica A. Munthali, Alister Ngwira, Bagrey Kadzandira, John Jamili-Phiri, Monica Ortiz, Justin R. Lambach, Philipp Hombach, Joachim Neuzil, Kathleen M. Stepanchak, Maria Bhat, Niranjan Maternal immunization in Malawi: A mixed methods study of community perceptions, programmatic considerations, and recommendations for future planning |
title | Maternal immunization in Malawi: A mixed methods study of community perceptions, programmatic considerations, and recommendations for future planning |
title_full | Maternal immunization in Malawi: A mixed methods study of community perceptions, programmatic considerations, and recommendations for future planning |
title_fullStr | Maternal immunization in Malawi: A mixed methods study of community perceptions, programmatic considerations, and recommendations for future planning |
title_full_unstemmed | Maternal immunization in Malawi: A mixed methods study of community perceptions, programmatic considerations, and recommendations for future planning |
title_short | Maternal immunization in Malawi: A mixed methods study of community perceptions, programmatic considerations, and recommendations for future planning |
title_sort | maternal immunization in malawi: a mixed methods study of community perceptions, programmatic considerations, and recommendations for future planning |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6642336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31319932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT flemingjessicaa maternalimmunizationinmalawiamixedmethodsstudyofcommunityperceptionsprogrammaticconsiderationsandrecommendationsforfutureplanning AT munthalialister maternalimmunizationinmalawiamixedmethodsstudyofcommunityperceptionsprogrammaticconsiderationsandrecommendationsforfutureplanning AT ngwirabagrey maternalimmunizationinmalawiamixedmethodsstudyofcommunityperceptionsprogrammaticconsiderationsandrecommendationsforfutureplanning AT kadzandirajohn maternalimmunizationinmalawiamixedmethodsstudyofcommunityperceptionsprogrammaticconsiderationsandrecommendationsforfutureplanning AT jamiliphirimonica maternalimmunizationinmalawiamixedmethodsstudyofcommunityperceptionsprogrammaticconsiderationsandrecommendationsforfutureplanning AT ortizjustinr maternalimmunizationinmalawiamixedmethodsstudyofcommunityperceptionsprogrammaticconsiderationsandrecommendationsforfutureplanning AT lambachphilipp maternalimmunizationinmalawiamixedmethodsstudyofcommunityperceptionsprogrammaticconsiderationsandrecommendationsforfutureplanning AT hombachjoachim maternalimmunizationinmalawiamixedmethodsstudyofcommunityperceptionsprogrammaticconsiderationsandrecommendationsforfutureplanning AT neuzilkathleenm maternalimmunizationinmalawiamixedmethodsstudyofcommunityperceptionsprogrammaticconsiderationsandrecommendationsforfutureplanning AT stepanchakmaria maternalimmunizationinmalawiamixedmethodsstudyofcommunityperceptionsprogrammaticconsiderationsandrecommendationsforfutureplanning AT bhatniranjan maternalimmunizationinmalawiamixedmethodsstudyofcommunityperceptionsprogrammaticconsiderationsandrecommendationsforfutureplanning |