Cargando…

Identifying signal-dependent information about the preictal state: A comparison across ECoG, EEG and EKG using deep learning

BACKGROUND: The inability to reliably assess seizure risk is a major burden for epilepsy patients and prevents developing better treatments. Recent advances have paved the way for increasingly accurate seizure preictal state detection algorithms, primarily using electrocorticography (ECoG). To devel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meisel, Christian, Bailey, Kimberlyn A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6642360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31300348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.07.001
_version_ 1783436964735746048
author Meisel, Christian
Bailey, Kimberlyn A.
author_facet Meisel, Christian
Bailey, Kimberlyn A.
author_sort Meisel, Christian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The inability to reliably assess seizure risk is a major burden for epilepsy patients and prevents developing better treatments. Recent advances have paved the way for increasingly accurate seizure preictal state detection algorithms, primarily using electrocorticography (ECoG). To develop seizure forecasting for broad clinical and ambulatory use, however, less complex and invasive modalities are needed. Algorithms using scalp electroencephalography (EEG) and electrocardiography (EKG) have also achieved better than chance performance. But it remains unknown how much preictal information is in ECoG versus modalities amenable to everyday use – such as EKG and single channel EEG - and how to optimally extract that preictal information for seizure prediction. METHODS: We apply deep learning - a powerful method to extract information from complex data - on a large epilepsy data set containing multi-day, simultaneous recordings of EKG, ECoG, and EEG, using a variety of feature sets. We use the relative performance of our algorithms to compare the preictal information contained in each modality. RESULTS: We find that single-channel EKG contains a comparable amount of preictal information as scalp EEG with up to 21 channels and that preictal information is best extracted not with standard heart rate measures, but from the power spectral density. We report that preictal information is not preferentially contained in EEG or ECoG channels within the seizure onset zone. CONCLUSION: Collectively, these insights may help to devise future prospective, minimally invasive long-term epilepsy monitoring trials with single-channel EKG as a particularly promising modality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6642360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66423602019-07-23 Identifying signal-dependent information about the preictal state: A comparison across ECoG, EEG and EKG using deep learning Meisel, Christian Bailey, Kimberlyn A. EBioMedicine Research paper BACKGROUND: The inability to reliably assess seizure risk is a major burden for epilepsy patients and prevents developing better treatments. Recent advances have paved the way for increasingly accurate seizure preictal state detection algorithms, primarily using electrocorticography (ECoG). To develop seizure forecasting for broad clinical and ambulatory use, however, less complex and invasive modalities are needed. Algorithms using scalp electroencephalography (EEG) and electrocardiography (EKG) have also achieved better than chance performance. But it remains unknown how much preictal information is in ECoG versus modalities amenable to everyday use – such as EKG and single channel EEG - and how to optimally extract that preictal information for seizure prediction. METHODS: We apply deep learning - a powerful method to extract information from complex data - on a large epilepsy data set containing multi-day, simultaneous recordings of EKG, ECoG, and EEG, using a variety of feature sets. We use the relative performance of our algorithms to compare the preictal information contained in each modality. RESULTS: We find that single-channel EKG contains a comparable amount of preictal information as scalp EEG with up to 21 channels and that preictal information is best extracted not with standard heart rate measures, but from the power spectral density. We report that preictal information is not preferentially contained in EEG or ECoG channels within the seizure onset zone. CONCLUSION: Collectively, these insights may help to devise future prospective, minimally invasive long-term epilepsy monitoring trials with single-channel EKG as a particularly promising modality. Elsevier 2019-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6642360/ /pubmed/31300348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.07.001 Text en © 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research paper
Meisel, Christian
Bailey, Kimberlyn A.
Identifying signal-dependent information about the preictal state: A comparison across ECoG, EEG and EKG using deep learning
title Identifying signal-dependent information about the preictal state: A comparison across ECoG, EEG and EKG using deep learning
title_full Identifying signal-dependent information about the preictal state: A comparison across ECoG, EEG and EKG using deep learning
title_fullStr Identifying signal-dependent information about the preictal state: A comparison across ECoG, EEG and EKG using deep learning
title_full_unstemmed Identifying signal-dependent information about the preictal state: A comparison across ECoG, EEG and EKG using deep learning
title_short Identifying signal-dependent information about the preictal state: A comparison across ECoG, EEG and EKG using deep learning
title_sort identifying signal-dependent information about the preictal state: a comparison across ecog, eeg and ekg using deep learning
topic Research paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6642360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31300348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.07.001
work_keys_str_mv AT meiselchristian identifyingsignaldependentinformationaboutthepreictalstateacomparisonacrossecogeegandekgusingdeeplearning
AT baileykimberlyna identifyingsignaldependentinformationaboutthepreictalstateacomparisonacrossecogeegandekgusingdeeplearning