Cargando…

Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests for Lassa fever: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Lassa fever virus has been enlisted as a priority pathogen of epidemic potential by the World Health organization Research and Development (WHO R & D) Blueprint. Diagnostics play a crucial role in epidemic preparedness. This systematic review was conducted to determine the sensitivit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takah, Noah Fongwen, Brangel, Polina, Shrestha, Priyanka, Peeling, Rosanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6642489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31324229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4242-6
_version_ 1783436983652057088
author Takah, Noah Fongwen
Brangel, Polina
Shrestha, Priyanka
Peeling, Rosanna
author_facet Takah, Noah Fongwen
Brangel, Polina
Shrestha, Priyanka
Peeling, Rosanna
author_sort Takah, Noah Fongwen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lassa fever virus has been enlisted as a priority pathogen of epidemic potential by the World Health organization Research and Development (WHO R & D) Blueprint. Diagnostics play a crucial role in epidemic preparedness. This systematic review was conducted to determine the sensitivity and specificity of Lassa fever diagnostic tests for humans. METHODS: We searched OVID Medline, OVID Embase, Scopus and Web of Science for laboratory based and field studies that reported the performance of diagnostic tests for Lassa fever in humans from 1 January 1990 to 25 January 2019. Two reviewers independently screened all the studies and included only studies that involved the evaluation of a Lassa fever diagnostic test and provided data on the sensitivity and specificity. The quality of the studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 criteria. Data on the study location, study design, type of sample, index test, reference tests and diagnostic performance were extracted from the studies. RESULTS: Out of a total of 1947 records identified, 1245 non-duplicate citations were obtained. Twenty-six (26) full-text articles examined which identified 08 studies meeting pre-defined criteria. Only one study was a field evaluation study. The sensitivity and specificity of the point of care (RDT) against the Nikisins qPCR were 91.2%(95% CI:75.2–97.7) and 86%(95% CI: 71.4–94.2) at temperatures 18–30 °C, while the sensitivity and specificity of the single IgM ELISA assay against standard RT-PCR were 31.1%(95%CI: 25.6–37) and 95.7%(95%CI:92.8–97.7). The sensitivity of the combined ELISA Antigen/IgM assay(against virus isolation), the recombinant IgM/IgG ELISA(against standard RT-PCR), and the IgM/IgG immunoblot(against IFA) were 88%(95%CI:77–95), 25.9%(95%CI:20.8–31.6), and 90.7%(95%CI:84.13–97.27) respectively. The specificity of the combined ELISA Antigen/IgM assay(against virus isolation), the recombinant IgM/IgG ELISA(against standard RT-PCR), and the IgM/IgG immunoblot(against IFA) were 90%(95%CI:88–91), 100%(95%CI:98.2–100), and 96.3%(95%CI:92.2–100) respectively. CONCLUSION: Lassa fever has assays for antigenaemia, IgM, IgG and PCR detection. The RDT reportedly performed well but more data are needed from other countries and at temperatures above 30 °C. Most combined immunoassays perform better than the single IgM. Multiplex and pan-Lassa assays are needed. More well conducted field studies are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospero registration number: CRD42018091585. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-019-4242-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6642489
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66424892019-07-29 Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests for Lassa fever: a systematic review Takah, Noah Fongwen Brangel, Polina Shrestha, Priyanka Peeling, Rosanna BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Lassa fever virus has been enlisted as a priority pathogen of epidemic potential by the World Health organization Research and Development (WHO R & D) Blueprint. Diagnostics play a crucial role in epidemic preparedness. This systematic review was conducted to determine the sensitivity and specificity of Lassa fever diagnostic tests for humans. METHODS: We searched OVID Medline, OVID Embase, Scopus and Web of Science for laboratory based and field studies that reported the performance of diagnostic tests for Lassa fever in humans from 1 January 1990 to 25 January 2019. Two reviewers independently screened all the studies and included only studies that involved the evaluation of a Lassa fever diagnostic test and provided data on the sensitivity and specificity. The quality of the studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 criteria. Data on the study location, study design, type of sample, index test, reference tests and diagnostic performance were extracted from the studies. RESULTS: Out of a total of 1947 records identified, 1245 non-duplicate citations were obtained. Twenty-six (26) full-text articles examined which identified 08 studies meeting pre-defined criteria. Only one study was a field evaluation study. The sensitivity and specificity of the point of care (RDT) against the Nikisins qPCR were 91.2%(95% CI:75.2–97.7) and 86%(95% CI: 71.4–94.2) at temperatures 18–30 °C, while the sensitivity and specificity of the single IgM ELISA assay against standard RT-PCR were 31.1%(95%CI: 25.6–37) and 95.7%(95%CI:92.8–97.7). The sensitivity of the combined ELISA Antigen/IgM assay(against virus isolation), the recombinant IgM/IgG ELISA(against standard RT-PCR), and the IgM/IgG immunoblot(against IFA) were 88%(95%CI:77–95), 25.9%(95%CI:20.8–31.6), and 90.7%(95%CI:84.13–97.27) respectively. The specificity of the combined ELISA Antigen/IgM assay(against virus isolation), the recombinant IgM/IgG ELISA(against standard RT-PCR), and the IgM/IgG immunoblot(against IFA) were 90%(95%CI:88–91), 100%(95%CI:98.2–100), and 96.3%(95%CI:92.2–100) respectively. CONCLUSION: Lassa fever has assays for antigenaemia, IgM, IgG and PCR detection. The RDT reportedly performed well but more data are needed from other countries and at temperatures above 30 °C. Most combined immunoassays perform better than the single IgM. Multiplex and pan-Lassa assays are needed. More well conducted field studies are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospero registration number: CRD42018091585. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-019-4242-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6642489/ /pubmed/31324229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4242-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Takah, Noah Fongwen
Brangel, Polina
Shrestha, Priyanka
Peeling, Rosanna
Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests for Lassa fever: a systematic review
title Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests for Lassa fever: a systematic review
title_full Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests for Lassa fever: a systematic review
title_fullStr Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests for Lassa fever: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests for Lassa fever: a systematic review
title_short Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests for Lassa fever: a systematic review
title_sort sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests for lassa fever: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6642489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31324229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4242-6
work_keys_str_mv AT takahnoahfongwen sensitivityandspecificityofdiagnostictestsforlassafeverasystematicreview
AT brangelpolina sensitivityandspecificityofdiagnostictestsforlassafeverasystematicreview
AT shresthapriyanka sensitivityandspecificityofdiagnostictestsforlassafeverasystematicreview
AT peelingrosanna sensitivityandspecificityofdiagnostictestsforlassafeverasystematicreview