Cargando…
Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests for Lassa fever: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Lassa fever virus has been enlisted as a priority pathogen of epidemic potential by the World Health organization Research and Development (WHO R & D) Blueprint. Diagnostics play a crucial role in epidemic preparedness. This systematic review was conducted to determine the sensitivit...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6642489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31324229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4242-6 |
_version_ | 1783436983652057088 |
---|---|
author | Takah, Noah Fongwen Brangel, Polina Shrestha, Priyanka Peeling, Rosanna |
author_facet | Takah, Noah Fongwen Brangel, Polina Shrestha, Priyanka Peeling, Rosanna |
author_sort | Takah, Noah Fongwen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Lassa fever virus has been enlisted as a priority pathogen of epidemic potential by the World Health organization Research and Development (WHO R & D) Blueprint. Diagnostics play a crucial role in epidemic preparedness. This systematic review was conducted to determine the sensitivity and specificity of Lassa fever diagnostic tests for humans. METHODS: We searched OVID Medline, OVID Embase, Scopus and Web of Science for laboratory based and field studies that reported the performance of diagnostic tests for Lassa fever in humans from 1 January 1990 to 25 January 2019. Two reviewers independently screened all the studies and included only studies that involved the evaluation of a Lassa fever diagnostic test and provided data on the sensitivity and specificity. The quality of the studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 criteria. Data on the study location, study design, type of sample, index test, reference tests and diagnostic performance were extracted from the studies. RESULTS: Out of a total of 1947 records identified, 1245 non-duplicate citations were obtained. Twenty-six (26) full-text articles examined which identified 08 studies meeting pre-defined criteria. Only one study was a field evaluation study. The sensitivity and specificity of the point of care (RDT) against the Nikisins qPCR were 91.2%(95% CI:75.2–97.7) and 86%(95% CI: 71.4–94.2) at temperatures 18–30 °C, while the sensitivity and specificity of the single IgM ELISA assay against standard RT-PCR were 31.1%(95%CI: 25.6–37) and 95.7%(95%CI:92.8–97.7). The sensitivity of the combined ELISA Antigen/IgM assay(against virus isolation), the recombinant IgM/IgG ELISA(against standard RT-PCR), and the IgM/IgG immunoblot(against IFA) were 88%(95%CI:77–95), 25.9%(95%CI:20.8–31.6), and 90.7%(95%CI:84.13–97.27) respectively. The specificity of the combined ELISA Antigen/IgM assay(against virus isolation), the recombinant IgM/IgG ELISA(against standard RT-PCR), and the IgM/IgG immunoblot(against IFA) were 90%(95%CI:88–91), 100%(95%CI:98.2–100), and 96.3%(95%CI:92.2–100) respectively. CONCLUSION: Lassa fever has assays for antigenaemia, IgM, IgG and PCR detection. The RDT reportedly performed well but more data are needed from other countries and at temperatures above 30 °C. Most combined immunoassays perform better than the single IgM. Multiplex and pan-Lassa assays are needed. More well conducted field studies are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospero registration number: CRD42018091585. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-019-4242-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6642489 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66424892019-07-29 Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests for Lassa fever: a systematic review Takah, Noah Fongwen Brangel, Polina Shrestha, Priyanka Peeling, Rosanna BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Lassa fever virus has been enlisted as a priority pathogen of epidemic potential by the World Health organization Research and Development (WHO R & D) Blueprint. Diagnostics play a crucial role in epidemic preparedness. This systematic review was conducted to determine the sensitivity and specificity of Lassa fever diagnostic tests for humans. METHODS: We searched OVID Medline, OVID Embase, Scopus and Web of Science for laboratory based and field studies that reported the performance of diagnostic tests for Lassa fever in humans from 1 January 1990 to 25 January 2019. Two reviewers independently screened all the studies and included only studies that involved the evaluation of a Lassa fever diagnostic test and provided data on the sensitivity and specificity. The quality of the studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 criteria. Data on the study location, study design, type of sample, index test, reference tests and diagnostic performance were extracted from the studies. RESULTS: Out of a total of 1947 records identified, 1245 non-duplicate citations were obtained. Twenty-six (26) full-text articles examined which identified 08 studies meeting pre-defined criteria. Only one study was a field evaluation study. The sensitivity and specificity of the point of care (RDT) against the Nikisins qPCR were 91.2%(95% CI:75.2–97.7) and 86%(95% CI: 71.4–94.2) at temperatures 18–30 °C, while the sensitivity and specificity of the single IgM ELISA assay against standard RT-PCR were 31.1%(95%CI: 25.6–37) and 95.7%(95%CI:92.8–97.7). The sensitivity of the combined ELISA Antigen/IgM assay(against virus isolation), the recombinant IgM/IgG ELISA(against standard RT-PCR), and the IgM/IgG immunoblot(against IFA) were 88%(95%CI:77–95), 25.9%(95%CI:20.8–31.6), and 90.7%(95%CI:84.13–97.27) respectively. The specificity of the combined ELISA Antigen/IgM assay(against virus isolation), the recombinant IgM/IgG ELISA(against standard RT-PCR), and the IgM/IgG immunoblot(against IFA) were 90%(95%CI:88–91), 100%(95%CI:98.2–100), and 96.3%(95%CI:92.2–100) respectively. CONCLUSION: Lassa fever has assays for antigenaemia, IgM, IgG and PCR detection. The RDT reportedly performed well but more data are needed from other countries and at temperatures above 30 °C. Most combined immunoassays perform better than the single IgM. Multiplex and pan-Lassa assays are needed. More well conducted field studies are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospero registration number: CRD42018091585. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-019-4242-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6642489/ /pubmed/31324229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4242-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Takah, Noah Fongwen Brangel, Polina Shrestha, Priyanka Peeling, Rosanna Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests for Lassa fever: a systematic review |
title | Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests for Lassa fever: a systematic review |
title_full | Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests for Lassa fever: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests for Lassa fever: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests for Lassa fever: a systematic review |
title_short | Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests for Lassa fever: a systematic review |
title_sort | sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests for lassa fever: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6642489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31324229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4242-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT takahnoahfongwen sensitivityandspecificityofdiagnostictestsforlassafeverasystematicreview AT brangelpolina sensitivityandspecificityofdiagnostictestsforlassafeverasystematicreview AT shresthapriyanka sensitivityandspecificityofdiagnostictestsforlassafeverasystematicreview AT peelingrosanna sensitivityandspecificityofdiagnostictestsforlassafeverasystematicreview |