Cargando…

A bibliometric analysis of classic publications in web of science category of orthopedics

BACKGROUND: The past century has witnessed the rapid development of operation technique, surgical instruments, and knowledge of the diseases in orthopedics. In the academic history, a number of classic papers boosted the advancement for surgery. In this paper, we performed a bibliometric analysis, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yunzhu, Xu, Gang, Long, Xiao, Ho, Yuh-Shan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6642495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31324248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1247-1
_version_ 1783436985111674880
author Li, Yunzhu
Xu, Gang
Long, Xiao
Ho, Yuh-Shan
author_facet Li, Yunzhu
Xu, Gang
Long, Xiao
Ho, Yuh-Shan
author_sort Li, Yunzhu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The past century has witnessed the rapid development of operation technique, surgical instruments, and knowledge of the diseases in orthopedics. In the academic history, a number of classic papers boosted the advancement for surgery. In this paper, we performed a bibliometric analysis, aiming to determine the most influential studies within the field. METHODS: Articles were searched from the publication year of 1900 to 2016 according to the Science Citation Index Expanded database of the Clarivate Analytics Web of Science Core Collection database. Two citation indicators TC(year) and C(year) were employed to characterize the classic articles and the articles were identified and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 30 classic articles with TC(2016) ≥ 1000 in Web of Science category of orthopedics were identified, all written in English between 1961 and 2007 by nine countries. The minimal value of TC(2016) was 1010; the maximum 3570; and the average 1591. Thirty classic articles were published in eight journals that were listed in the Web of Science category of orthopedics in 2016, and in two other orthopedics journals that were no longer tracked by Web of Science category of orthopedics as of 2016. Among the top 10 cited articles in both TC(2016) and C(2016), five articles barely received attention in the first few years after their publication, while they became cited more and more frequently in the last decade. CONCLUSION: This study evaluated the development and trend of orthopedics research by adopting bibliometric analysis. It serves as a guide for investigators in the future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6642495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66424952019-07-29 A bibliometric analysis of classic publications in web of science category of orthopedics Li, Yunzhu Xu, Gang Long, Xiao Ho, Yuh-Shan J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The past century has witnessed the rapid development of operation technique, surgical instruments, and knowledge of the diseases in orthopedics. In the academic history, a number of classic papers boosted the advancement for surgery. In this paper, we performed a bibliometric analysis, aiming to determine the most influential studies within the field. METHODS: Articles were searched from the publication year of 1900 to 2016 according to the Science Citation Index Expanded database of the Clarivate Analytics Web of Science Core Collection database. Two citation indicators TC(year) and C(year) were employed to characterize the classic articles and the articles were identified and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 30 classic articles with TC(2016) ≥ 1000 in Web of Science category of orthopedics were identified, all written in English between 1961 and 2007 by nine countries. The minimal value of TC(2016) was 1010; the maximum 3570; and the average 1591. Thirty classic articles were published in eight journals that were listed in the Web of Science category of orthopedics in 2016, and in two other orthopedics journals that were no longer tracked by Web of Science category of orthopedics as of 2016. Among the top 10 cited articles in both TC(2016) and C(2016), five articles barely received attention in the first few years after their publication, while they became cited more and more frequently in the last decade. CONCLUSION: This study evaluated the development and trend of orthopedics research by adopting bibliometric analysis. It serves as a guide for investigators in the future research. BioMed Central 2019-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6642495/ /pubmed/31324248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1247-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Yunzhu
Xu, Gang
Long, Xiao
Ho, Yuh-Shan
A bibliometric analysis of classic publications in web of science category of orthopedics
title A bibliometric analysis of classic publications in web of science category of orthopedics
title_full A bibliometric analysis of classic publications in web of science category of orthopedics
title_fullStr A bibliometric analysis of classic publications in web of science category of orthopedics
title_full_unstemmed A bibliometric analysis of classic publications in web of science category of orthopedics
title_short A bibliometric analysis of classic publications in web of science category of orthopedics
title_sort bibliometric analysis of classic publications in web of science category of orthopedics
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6642495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31324248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1247-1
work_keys_str_mv AT liyunzhu abibliometricanalysisofclassicpublicationsinwebofsciencecategoryoforthopedics
AT xugang abibliometricanalysisofclassicpublicationsinwebofsciencecategoryoforthopedics
AT longxiao abibliometricanalysisofclassicpublicationsinwebofsciencecategoryoforthopedics
AT hoyuhshan abibliometricanalysisofclassicpublicationsinwebofsciencecategoryoforthopedics
AT liyunzhu bibliometricanalysisofclassicpublicationsinwebofsciencecategoryoforthopedics
AT xugang bibliometricanalysisofclassicpublicationsinwebofsciencecategoryoforthopedics
AT longxiao bibliometricanalysisofclassicpublicationsinwebofsciencecategoryoforthopedics
AT hoyuhshan bibliometricanalysisofclassicpublicationsinwebofsciencecategoryoforthopedics