Cargando…

Patient decision aids: a content analysis based on a decision tree structure

INTRODUCTION: This paper presents the preliminary results of a decision-tree analysis of Patient Decision Aids (PDA). PDAs are online or offline tools used to structure health information, elicit relevant values and emphasize the decision as a process, in ways that help patients make more informed h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Gheondea-Eladi, Alexandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6642566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31324237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0840-x
_version_ 1783437002103848960
author Gheondea-Eladi, Alexandra
author_facet Gheondea-Eladi, Alexandra
author_sort Gheondea-Eladi, Alexandra
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This paper presents the preliminary results of a decision-tree analysis of Patient Decision Aids (PDA). PDAs are online or offline tools used to structure health information, elicit relevant values and emphasize the decision as a process, in ways that help patients make more informed health decisions individually or with relevant others. METHOD: Twenty PDAs are randomly selected from the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) (https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/AZlist.html) approved list. An evaluation tool is built bottom-up and top-down and results are described in terms of communicating uncertainty, completeness of the decision tree, ambiguous or misleading phrasing, overall strategies suggested within personal stories. RESULTS: Twelve of the analyzed PDAs had branches of the decision tree which were not discussed in the tool and 6 had logically ambiguous phrasing. Many tools included dichotomous options, when the option range was wider. Several options were clustered within the “Do not take/Do not do” option and thus the PDA failed to provide all comparisons necessary to make a decision. Some tools employ expressions that do not differentiate between lack of information and known negative effects. Other tools provide unequal amounts or non-comparable bits of information about the options. CONCLUSION: These results indicate a very loose range of interpretations of what constitutes an option, a treatment, and a treatment option. It thus emphasizes a gap between theory and practice in the evaluation of PDAs. Future developments of PDA evaluation tools should keep track of missing decision tree branches, accurate communication of uncertainty, ambiguity, and lack of knowledge and consider using measures for evaluating the completeness of the option spectrum at an agreed period in time. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12911-019-0840-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6642566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66425662019-07-29 Patient decision aids: a content analysis based on a decision tree structure Gheondea-Eladi, Alexandra BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article INTRODUCTION: This paper presents the preliminary results of a decision-tree analysis of Patient Decision Aids (PDA). PDAs are online or offline tools used to structure health information, elicit relevant values and emphasize the decision as a process, in ways that help patients make more informed health decisions individually or with relevant others. METHOD: Twenty PDAs are randomly selected from the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) (https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/AZlist.html) approved list. An evaluation tool is built bottom-up and top-down and results are described in terms of communicating uncertainty, completeness of the decision tree, ambiguous or misleading phrasing, overall strategies suggested within personal stories. RESULTS: Twelve of the analyzed PDAs had branches of the decision tree which were not discussed in the tool and 6 had logically ambiguous phrasing. Many tools included dichotomous options, when the option range was wider. Several options were clustered within the “Do not take/Do not do” option and thus the PDA failed to provide all comparisons necessary to make a decision. Some tools employ expressions that do not differentiate between lack of information and known negative effects. Other tools provide unequal amounts or non-comparable bits of information about the options. CONCLUSION: These results indicate a very loose range of interpretations of what constitutes an option, a treatment, and a treatment option. It thus emphasizes a gap between theory and practice in the evaluation of PDAs. Future developments of PDA evaluation tools should keep track of missing decision tree branches, accurate communication of uncertainty, ambiguity, and lack of knowledge and consider using measures for evaluating the completeness of the option spectrum at an agreed period in time. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12911-019-0840-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6642566/ /pubmed/31324237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0840-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gheondea-Eladi, Alexandra
Patient decision aids: a content analysis based on a decision tree structure
title Patient decision aids: a content analysis based on a decision tree structure
title_full Patient decision aids: a content analysis based on a decision tree structure
title_fullStr Patient decision aids: a content analysis based on a decision tree structure
title_full_unstemmed Patient decision aids: a content analysis based on a decision tree structure
title_short Patient decision aids: a content analysis based on a decision tree structure
title_sort patient decision aids: a content analysis based on a decision tree structure
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6642566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31324237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0840-x
work_keys_str_mv AT gheondeaeladialexandra patientdecisionaidsacontentanalysisbasedonadecisiontreestructure