Cargando…

Lymph Node Ratio Versus TNM System As Prognostic Factor in Colorectal Cancer Staging. a Single Center Experience

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to establish the actual validity of the lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic factor for colorectal cancer patients, and to verify differences of survival and disease-free interval. METHODS: Patients referred with colorectal cancer who underwent potentially curative surge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moccia, Francesco, Tolone, Salvatore, Allaria, Alfredo, Napolitano, Vincenzo, Rosa, D’Amico, Ilaria, Ferrante, Ottavia, Manto, Cesaro, Edoardo, Docimo, Ludovico, Fei, Landino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6642801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31346549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2019-0058
_version_ 1783437042465636352
author Moccia, Francesco
Tolone, Salvatore
Allaria, Alfredo
Napolitano, Vincenzo
Rosa, D’Amico
Ilaria, Ferrante
Ottavia, Manto
Cesaro, Edoardo
Docimo, Ludovico
Fei, Landino
author_facet Moccia, Francesco
Tolone, Salvatore
Allaria, Alfredo
Napolitano, Vincenzo
Rosa, D’Amico
Ilaria, Ferrante
Ottavia, Manto
Cesaro, Edoardo
Docimo, Ludovico
Fei, Landino
author_sort Moccia, Francesco
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aims to establish the actual validity of the lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic factor for colorectal cancer patients, and to verify differences of survival and disease-free interval. METHODS: Patients referred with colorectal cancer who underwent potentially curative surgery between January 1997 and December 2011 were included. Lymph node ratio, TNM staging and survival were extracted from surgical, histological and follow-up records. RESULTS: Two hundred eigthy six patients with different stages of colorectal cancer underwent surgery, with comparison of survival prediction based on lymph node ratio and TNM staging. The overall survival rate was 78.3%, the recurrence rate was 11.9% and the mortality rate was estimated as 21.7%. Univariate analysis in relation to survival was significant for the following variables: serum level of CEA, CA 19.9 value, degree of histological differentiation, and tumor growth. There weren’t any statistically significant differences for the LNR (LNR </ ≥0.16: p = 0.116). The TNM system was effective both in discriminating between survival stages (Stage II vs. Stage III: p = 0.05) and in differentiating sub-groups (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: LNR alone could not be considered a better prognostic factor than the TNM system. However, future studies are needed in a larger number of patients with a standardized surgical, pathological and medical protocol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6642801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher De Gruyter
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66428012019-07-25 Lymph Node Ratio Versus TNM System As Prognostic Factor in Colorectal Cancer Staging. a Single Center Experience Moccia, Francesco Tolone, Salvatore Allaria, Alfredo Napolitano, Vincenzo Rosa, D’Amico Ilaria, Ferrante Ottavia, Manto Cesaro, Edoardo Docimo, Ludovico Fei, Landino Open Med (Wars) Research Article OBJECTIVE: This study aims to establish the actual validity of the lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic factor for colorectal cancer patients, and to verify differences of survival and disease-free interval. METHODS: Patients referred with colorectal cancer who underwent potentially curative surgery between January 1997 and December 2011 were included. Lymph node ratio, TNM staging and survival were extracted from surgical, histological and follow-up records. RESULTS: Two hundred eigthy six patients with different stages of colorectal cancer underwent surgery, with comparison of survival prediction based on lymph node ratio and TNM staging. The overall survival rate was 78.3%, the recurrence rate was 11.9% and the mortality rate was estimated as 21.7%. Univariate analysis in relation to survival was significant for the following variables: serum level of CEA, CA 19.9 value, degree of histological differentiation, and tumor growth. There weren’t any statistically significant differences for the LNR (LNR </ ≥0.16: p = 0.116). The TNM system was effective both in discriminating between survival stages (Stage II vs. Stage III: p = 0.05) and in differentiating sub-groups (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: LNR alone could not be considered a better prognostic factor than the TNM system. However, future studies are needed in a larger number of patients with a standardized surgical, pathological and medical protocol. De Gruyter 2019-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6642801/ /pubmed/31346549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2019-0058 Text en © 2019 Francesco Moccia et al., published by De Gruyter http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Moccia, Francesco
Tolone, Salvatore
Allaria, Alfredo
Napolitano, Vincenzo
Rosa, D’Amico
Ilaria, Ferrante
Ottavia, Manto
Cesaro, Edoardo
Docimo, Ludovico
Fei, Landino
Lymph Node Ratio Versus TNM System As Prognostic Factor in Colorectal Cancer Staging. a Single Center Experience
title Lymph Node Ratio Versus TNM System As Prognostic Factor in Colorectal Cancer Staging. a Single Center Experience
title_full Lymph Node Ratio Versus TNM System As Prognostic Factor in Colorectal Cancer Staging. a Single Center Experience
title_fullStr Lymph Node Ratio Versus TNM System As Prognostic Factor in Colorectal Cancer Staging. a Single Center Experience
title_full_unstemmed Lymph Node Ratio Versus TNM System As Prognostic Factor in Colorectal Cancer Staging. a Single Center Experience
title_short Lymph Node Ratio Versus TNM System As Prognostic Factor in Colorectal Cancer Staging. a Single Center Experience
title_sort lymph node ratio versus tnm system as prognostic factor in colorectal cancer staging. a single center experience
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6642801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31346549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2019-0058
work_keys_str_mv AT mocciafrancesco lymphnoderatioversustnmsystemasprognosticfactorincolorectalcancerstagingasinglecenterexperience
AT tolonesalvatore lymphnoderatioversustnmsystemasprognosticfactorincolorectalcancerstagingasinglecenterexperience
AT allariaalfredo lymphnoderatioversustnmsystemasprognosticfactorincolorectalcancerstagingasinglecenterexperience
AT napolitanovincenzo lymphnoderatioversustnmsystemasprognosticfactorincolorectalcancerstagingasinglecenterexperience
AT rosadamico lymphnoderatioversustnmsystemasprognosticfactorincolorectalcancerstagingasinglecenterexperience
AT ilariaferrante lymphnoderatioversustnmsystemasprognosticfactorincolorectalcancerstagingasinglecenterexperience
AT ottaviamanto lymphnoderatioversustnmsystemasprognosticfactorincolorectalcancerstagingasinglecenterexperience
AT cesaroedoardo lymphnoderatioversustnmsystemasprognosticfactorincolorectalcancerstagingasinglecenterexperience
AT docimoludovico lymphnoderatioversustnmsystemasprognosticfactorincolorectalcancerstagingasinglecenterexperience
AT feilandino lymphnoderatioversustnmsystemasprognosticfactorincolorectalcancerstagingasinglecenterexperience